680 likes | 967 Views
Should EHDI Programs Be Concerned about Cytomegalovirus (CMV)?. Karen B. Fowler, DrPH Department of Pediatrics University of Alabama at Birmingham. Faculty Disclosure Information.
E N D
Should EHDI Programs Be Concerned about Cytomegalovirus (CMV)? Karen B. Fowler, DrPH Department of Pediatrics University of Alabama at Birmingham
Faculty Disclosure Information In the last 12 months, I have not had a significant financial interest or other relationship with the manufacturer(s) of the product(s) or provider(s) of the service(s) that will be discussed in my presentation This presentation will not include discussion of pharmaceuticals or devices that have not been approved by the FDA.
Brief Review of Congenital CMV Infection • Characteristics of Populations at Increased Risk for Congenital CMV Infections • Congenital CMV Infection & Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SNHL) • NIDCD Study • What should EHDI programs know about CMV?
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a herpesvirus that may be transmitted from mother to fetus anytime during gestation and may or may not cause any apparent damage to the fetus (Congenital CMV Infection)
Human CMV may be transmitted through either direct or indirect person-to-person contact Sources of Virus: urine semen tears blood oropharyngeal secretions cervical & vaginal secretions
Human CMV may be transmitted through either direct or indirect person-to-person contact CMV is not very contagious and the spread of virus requires close or intimate contact with infected secretions
Clinical evidence alone will not identify most congenital CMV infections Diagnosis of Congenital CMV Infection • Saliva or urine • Within the first 2 weeks of life • Virus isolation (culture) or identification (immunofluorescence test-DEAFF) of virus
Symptoms of congenital CMV infection petechiae hyperbilirubinemia (jaundice) hepatosplenomegaly (enlarged spleen or liver) thrombocytopenia seizures intracranial calcifications microcephaly (< 5%tile)
90% of the infants with congenital CMV infection will have no clinical evidence (symptoms) of infection during the newborn period Only 10% of the infants with congenital CMV infection will have clinical evidence or symptoms of infection during the newborn period
The expected 10% symptomatic estimate is based on studies of infants screened for congenital CMV infection where the investigators have reviewed their medical records for specific symptoms and categorized them accordingly. However, in our data about 2/3 of infants we classified as symptomatic were not identified by the medical staff while in the hospital as having CMV infection. This suggests unless routine CMV screening takes place, < 5% of infants with CMV infection are identified.
Sequelae of congenital CMV infection Sensorineural hearing loss 19% Mental retardation (IQ < 70) 19% Retinitis 6% Cerebral Palsy 4% Neurologic problems/Seizures 6% Based on UAB data
Summary Review of Congenital CMV infection • CMV is a common virus although not easily spread person to person • Diagnosis needs to be made in the first 2 weeks of life • Clinical observation of infection in the newborn period identifies < 5% of all infants with congenital CMV infection • Long term sequelae may occur following infection with sensorineural hearing loss being the most common
Characteristics of Populations at Increased Risk for Congenital CMV Infections
Congenital CMV Infection is the most common intrauterine infection in humans • Incidence estimates of congenital CMV infection range from 0.2% – 2.2%. • US estimates of congenital CMV infection range from 0.5% – 1.0%.
The incidence of congenital CMV infection varies: • by geography • the underlying CMV seroprevalence in the maternal population • The incidence of congenital CMV infection is higher in populations where the underlying CMV seroprevalence or pre-existing immunity is higher in the mothers.
Maternal Seroprevalence (%) Rate of Congenital CMV Infection (%)
Similar maternal and socio-demographic factors have been associated with delivering an infant with congenital CMV infection in studies of different populations
Caucasian (origin in any of the original people of Europe, the Middle East or North Africa)
Central/South America (Hispanic-Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race)
African or African American (origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa) *Fowler, unpublished data
Asian (origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia or the Indian subcontinent) *S Broor, personal communication
Incidence of Congenital CMV Infection by Racial/Ethnic Categories *Fowler, meta analysis, unpublished
Prevalence of Congenital CMV Infection by Maternal Age for Newborns Screened at UAB Hospital (n=46,095) & a Private Hospital (n=9,892) Per 1000 births Maternal Age at Delivery Fowler, et. al. JID1993 & Fowler, et. al. submitted
Prevalence of Congenital CMV Infection Teen MothersScreened at UAB Hospital, 1980 - 2000 African American Caucasian Per 1000 births Maternal Age at Delivery Fowler, unpublished data
Summary Review of Congenital CMV Infection Rates • Congenital CMV infection will be more common in populations with high (> 70%) maternal CMV seroprevalances • African Americans and Hispanic delivery populations will have higher rates of congenital CMV infection than primarily Caucasian and Asian delivery populations • Delivery populations with large numbers of teens will have the highest rates of congenital CMV infection
Congenital CMV Infection & Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SNHL)
CMV Infection & Hearing Loss 1960s-CID or Symptomatic CMV Infection & HL was first reported. Medearis, 1964 McCracken, et al. 1969 1970s-Inapparent or Asymptomatic CMV Infection & HL was first reported Reynolds, et al. 1974 & Dahle, et al. 1974 Hanshaw, et al. 1976 Stagno, et al. 1977
CMV Infection & Hearing Loss 1970s & 1980s-Progression and Delayed Onset Hearing Loss were first described Dahle, et al. 1979 Pass, et al. 1980 Williamson, et al. 1982
Population Based Longitudinal Studies Delayed Onset Loss Symptoms N SNHL N (%) Progressive Loss Fluctuating Loss Hamilton, Canada 3 Sx 1 (33) N Y N Saigal, et. al. 198238 ASx 6 (16) Malmö, Sweden 9 Sx 2 (22) N N N Ahlfors, et. al. 198434 ASx 2 (6) London, England 3 Sx 1 (33) Y N N Preece, et. al. 198447 ASx 4 (8)
Population Based Longitudinal Studies Delayed Onset Loss Symptoms N SNHL N (%) Progressive Loss Fluctuating Loss Cleveland, US 17 ASx 4 (23) N N Y Kumar, et. al. 1984 Houston, US 17 Sx 11 (65) Y N Y Williamson, et al. 1982 59 ASx 9 (15) Williamson, et al. 1992 Birmingham, US 209 Sx 85 (41) Y Y Y Dahle, et al. 2000651 ASx 48 (7) Sapporo, Japan 17 ASx 2 (12) N N Y Numazaki, et al. 2004
Summarizing from these studies: • 22 – 65% Symptomatic children will have hearing loss • 6-23% Asymptomatic children will have hearing loss • Sensorineural hearing loss following congenital CMV infection may be present at birth or delayed • Progression (audiometric threshold > 10 dB deterioration) and fluctuation of hearing loss may occur in children with SNHL due to congenital CMV infection
In the 1990s & 2000s, multiple studies have further characterized HL due to congenital CMV infection UAB Cohort-the largest cohort to date Characteristics of CMV related HL
UAB Longitudinal Study of HL Asymptomatic Symptomatic Total Number of Children 651 209 SNHL 48 (7.4%) 85 (40.7%) Unilateral 25 (52.1%) 28 (32.9%) Bilateral 23 (47.9%) 57 (67.1%) High-Frequency Only 18 (37.5%) 11 (12.9%) (4000-8000 Hz) Dahle, et. al., 2000
UAB Longitudinal Study of HL Asymptomatic Symptomatic Total Number of Children 651 209 Degree of Loss % % Mild (21-45 dB HL) 17.0 11.8 Moderate (46-70 dB HL) 14.9 13.4 Severe (71-90 dB HL) 17.0 30.7 Profound (> 90 dB HL) 51.1 44.1 Dahle, et. al., 2000
UAB Longitudinal Study of HL Asymptomatic Symptomatic Total Number of Children 651 209 Delayed Onset Loss 18 (37.5%) 23 (27.1%) Median age (range) of Delayed Onset 44 mo (24-182) 33 mo (6-197) Dahle, et. al., 2000
UAB Longitudinal Study of HL Asymptomatic Symptomatic Total Number of Children 651 209 Progressive Loss 26 (54.2%) 46 (54.1%) Median age (range) of First Progression 51 mo (3-186) 26 mo (2-209) Fluctuating Loss 26 (54.1%) 25 (29.4%) Improvement of Loss 23 (47.9%) 18 (21.2%) Dahle, et. al., 2000
Cumulative incidence of SNHL in 388 children with congenital CMV infection Age of Child SNHL > 20 dB SNHL > 30 dB < 1 month 5.2% 3.9% 3 months 6.5% 5.3% 12 months 8.4% 6.8% 24 months 9.9% 7.2% 36 months 10.8% 7.6% 60 months 12.4% 7.6% 72 months 15.4% 8.3% Fowler, et. al., 1999
Cumulative incidence of SNHL in 388 children with congenital CMV infection Symptomatic n=53 Asymptomatic n=335 Age of Child < 1 month 16.5% 2.9% 3 months 22.8% 4.0% 72 months 36.4% 11.3% Fowler, et. al., 1999
Disseminated infection at birth with or without CNS involvement is associated with HL in symptomatic infants Rivera, et al. 2002 Maternal and perinatal factors do not predict hearing loss in children with asymptomatic congenital CMV infection Fowler, unpublished data Possible Other factor Contributing to HL due to CMV
Possible Other factor Contributing to HL due to CMV Children with asymptomatic congenital CMV infection with higher amounts of infectious CMV in their urine and CMV DNA in their blood during early infancy are more likely to have SNHL Boppana, et al. 2005
Viral Burden in Infancy & HL in Asymptomatic Infants Hearing Loss N=4 Normal Hearing N=54 Mean duration of follow-up, mos 39.3 ± 23.9 33.5 ± 17.6 Median number of hearing evals 7 (2-14) 6 (2-13) Mean amount of CMV in urine 1.6 x 105± 2.1 x 105 2.9 x 104± 7.8 x 104 (pfu/ml ± SD)* Mean PB blood virus burden 8.7 x 105± 1.6 x 106 1.1 x 104± 1.5 x 104 (ge/ml± SD)* *p < 0.05 Boppana, et al. 2005
Impact of Universal Newborn Screening on the Detection of HL due to CMV
Risk criteria based neonatal auditory screening was not successful in identifying HL due to congenital CMV infection Only 17.6% of children with SNHL due to congenital CMV infection were identified by risk criteria based neonatal auditory screening at UAB between 1985-1998
SNHL in infants with congenital CMV infection according to results of risk criteria based neonatal auditory screening, 1985-1998 Audiology Newborn Hearing N Follow-up SNHL Failed 15 15 8 (53.3) Inconclusive 3 3 1 (33.3) Passed 55 50 4 (8.0) Not Tested 321 287 38 (13.2) Hicks, et al., 1993 Fowler, unpublished data
SNHL in infants with congenital CMV infection since universal newborn hearing screening, 1998-2002 Audiology Newborn Hearing N Follow-up SNHL Failed 8 8 3 (37.5) Passed 34 32 4 (11.8) Not Tested 42 42 5 (11.9) Fowler, unpublished data
Overall, 3/12 (25%) of the children with SNHL due to congenital CMV infection were identified in the newborn period by universal screening 3/5 not tested had documented delayed onset loss 7/12 (58%) of children with SNHL had delayed onset loss 3/5 (60%) of children with SNHL at birth were identified by universal screening
Summary Review of SNHL due to CMV • ~50% of the loss is bilateral • ~ 65% is severe to profound loss • ~50% of the loss is progressive • ~50% to 60% is delayed onset (occurring in the first years of life) • Fluctuating and high frequency loss also occur