230 likes | 319 Views
19 November 2010, Brussels. ETISplus Rail Data Workshop ETISplus: Rail networks, impedances and link load data. ECKHARD SZIMBA, MARKUS KRAFT, JAN IHRIG, JOCHEN SIEGELE. Agenda. ETISplus main principle ETISplus rail network model – methodology and main contents
E N D
19 November 2010, Brussels ETISplus Rail Data Workshop ETISplus: Rail networks, impedances and link load data ECKHARD SZIMBA, MARKUS KRAFT, JAN IHRIG, JOCHEN SIEGELE
Agenda • ETISplus main principle • ETISplus rail network model – methodology and main contents • ETISplus impedances – methodology and contents • ETISplus link load data – methodology
Usage of as many ›original‹ data as possible • Usage of generated data to fill data gaps
ETISplus rail network model – general items • Scope of the rail network model: Comprising network and important terminals • Purpose of the rail network model: modelling passenger and freight transport in Europe, i.e. computation of transport impedances, assignment, external impacts • Basis: TRANS-TOOLS version 2 passenger/ freight network models
ETISplus rail network model – main link attributes • Unique ID • Nodes (f-node, t-node) • (Maximum) speed passenger train • (Maximum) speed freight train • Number of tracks • High-speed link • Operation by freight/ passenger trains • Priority rail freight link • Operation by long-distance passenger trains • ›Traffic count‹ data
ETISplus rail network model – main terminal attributes • Passenger terminals (stations with long-distance services) • Unique ID • Name • Country and NUTS-3 region the station is located • Freight terminals • Unique ID • Name • Country and NUTS-3 region the terminal is located • Connectivity to other modes • Working hours per day • Working days per week
ETISplus rail impedance data – general items • For modelling purposes, data mainly required at the level of O/D relations (NUTS-3NUTS-3 regions) • Main impedance data: travel time; travel distance; user costs; frequency; reliability (as far as data availability allows) • Limited availability of data at the level of O/D relations Variety of different methodologies applied for data collection/ computation within ETISplus
ETISplus impedance data – example: Methodology for computing direct user costs for rail passenger • NO official Europe-wide database available on national and international rail tariffs • Degressive course of cost function over travelled distance • Considerable differences of tariff structures among different countries • Considerable differences of tariff structures among different service segments Modelling passenger rail fares as a function of travelled distance, under application of country- and service segment-specific peculiarities.
ETISplus impedance data – example: Methodology for computing direct user costs for rail passenger
ETISplus impedance data – example: Methodology for computing direct user costs for rail passenger
ETISplus impedance data – example: Methodology for computing direct user costs for rail passenger
ETISplus rail link load data – general remarks • Aim of ETISplus: Collection of link load data for the core rail network in Europe and neighbouring countries • Data availability for rail at less satisfactory level (in contrast to road) • UN/ ECE data do not differentiate between passenger and freight trains • EUROSTAT data differentiate among passenger trains, freight trains and other trains, and raise questions on methodology applied to create the data • Significant differences in data availability by country and by transport market (passenger/ freight) • Strong differences by level of detail and formatat which data are provided
ETISplus rail link load data – rail traffic count data from UN/ ECE Availability of UN/ ECE rail traffic count data Network topology TRANS-TOOLS vs. UN/ ECE
ETISplus rail link load data – examples of raw data formats: GIS data
ETISplus rail link load data – examples of raw data formats: thematic maps
ETISplus rail link load data – examples of raw data formats: tables
ETISplus rail link load data – Overview of methodology + NATIONAL SOURCES INTERNATIONAL SOURCES CONSOLIDATION PROCESS EU27 countries, + Switzerland, Norway, + Accession countries, + Candidate countries, + Other neighb. countries TEN-T EA SOURCE DATA FORMATS EUROSTAT RAIL NETWORK MODEL
Conclusions • Several of the rail related data gaps within TRANS-TOOLS will be bridged by ETISplus • Improvement of the situation of demand data availability for transport demand modelling and impact assessment requires the cooperation with railway companies • The use of many different rail network models for different purposes, such as • Network model A, used for modelling within TRANS-TOOLS; • Network model B, used for collecting infrastructure-related data for TEN-Tec; • Network model C, used for collecting traffic count data by UN/ ECE, • imposes relevant efficiency restrictions for transport modellers. • Considerable efficiency gains could be realised by agreeing on one network model, which reflects the needs of all stakeholders
Thank you for your attention. Eckhard Szimba, Ph.D. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) Institute for Economic Policy Research (IWW) Network Economics szimba@kit.edu
ETISplus rail link load data – Collection of national data, state of the art: passenger transport
ETISplus rail link load data – Collection of national data, state of the art: passenger transport
ETISplus rail link load data – rail traffic count data from EUROSTAT Example: rail freight trains around the city of Tuttlingen (South Germany), located on the TEN-T line Stuttgart-Singen(-Zurich) • Node T seems to be a relevant source and destination of rail freight flows • However, node T does not have a rail freight terminal • The main transport axis (north-south direction) shows a significant point of discontinuity, although node T does not have a rail freight terminal 7959 7958 311 3779 T 3778 312 369 369