220 likes | 354 Views
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Seattle, June 2014. Configuration Backlog Reduction – There and Back Again Susan Atkin, Wolf Creek N.O.C. Configuration Backlog Reduction. In May 2013, there were 1521 packages open. 319 in Development phase
E N D
Configuration Management Benchmarking GroupSeattle, June 2014 Configuration Backlog Reduction – There and Back Again Susan Atkin, Wolf Creek N.O.C.
Configuration Backlog Reduction • In May 2013, there were 1521 packages open. • 319 in Development phase • 506 with Fieldwork, in phases of Planning, Implementation, and Program Updates • 528 Document Change Only, released from Engineering and waiting for Closeout to begin • 151 in Engineering Closeout phase • 9 held at Document Services due to problems • 8 “ongoing” packages
Configuration Backlog Reduction • Of 1521 packages, 1202 packages had drawings, manuals, and calculations that potentially did not match the plant configuration (packages released from Engineering) • If we estimate approximately 10 documents affected per package on average, then… • 1202 packages = 12,020 documents with fidelity uncertainty
Configuration Backlog Reduction • Essential Control Room Drawings are revised within 24 Normal Working Hours • Significant Drawings (Clearance Orders/ Personnel Safety) are revised within 15 days • Document Backlog DID NOT include these. • Document Backlog DID include • Calculations, Vendor Manuals, Design Drawings, Specifications
Configuration Backlog Reduction • Culture in which Design Engineering wasn’t allowed to say “no” created: • No appetite suppression • 319 packages in Development phase (May 2013) • 30 Design Engineers • Approximately 300 packages developed per year • Each engineer had over a year’s worth of work waiting for him/her (packages, CR evaluations, training, level of effort work) • No time for “low priority” work like Closeouts
Configuration Backlog Reduction • Money allocated for Closeouts was re-directed to special projects yearly • Design Change Process excludes Engineering from post-implementation turnover to Operations (engineer didn’t know when modification was implemented) • Maintenance had heavy workload implementing 300 packages/ year on top of PMs and broke/fix work • Engineering and Maintenance Supervisors didn’t schedule time for Closeouts
Configuration Backlog Reduction • How did we get there? Culture
Configuration Backlog Reduction • Remedial • Close packages at all stages, end goal of 100 open • Create Closeout Team • Make Closeout process easier • Preventive • Create a front-end filter to say “No” • 20/40 List • Revise Development process • Stakeholders process • Communicate and Hold Accountable
Configuration Backlog Reduction • Remedial, Close packages at all stages • Design Engineering provided list of packages from Development through Planning to System Engineering • System Engineering force ranked packages by system • Maintenance, Operations, Design, and Systems culled the list of packages (Managers) • Packages cancelled or approved • Packages approved for development prioritized • Need to work now vs. Nice to have eventually • dropped 304 to 161
Configuration Backlog Reduction • Remedial, Close packages at all stages • Packages in Planning, Implementation stages • Scheduled Work • Packages in Program Updates stage (Implementation Complete) • Maintenance Closeout Team (3 coordinators) • Packages in Engineering Closeout • Engineering Closeout Team (3 coordinators, 6 drafters, 2 checkers, 3 engineers, 1 project manager, 1 supervisor) • Configuration Management Drafters working Closeout exclusively 1 week/month each
Configuration Backlog Reduction • Remedial, Make Closeout process easier • Procedure changes • Allow up to 5 DDCNs per document • Allow up to 5 Final CCNs per calculation • Created Closeout Procedure • Engineers trained on new procedure • Closeout Coordinators helping with forms
Configuration Backlog Reduction • Preventive, Front End Filter • Managers as front-end filter • Packages must have manager approval before being initiated • PHC as front-end filter • Non-Emergent Fieldwork Packages must have PHC approval before being initiated • Funding must be committed before Engineering work is initiated • Modification Impact Summary created to help PHC make informed decisions
Configuration Backlog Reduction • Preventive, 20/40 List • 20 Outage / 40 Online Fieldwork Packages • Current 20/40 List has 161 Packages • Strategy: Attrition and Front-end Filter
Configuration Backlog ReductionPreventive, Revise Development Process* 36 Procedures changing, mid-July roll out *Changes include moving activities from end of Design Change Process to Development stage • PM development • Procedure change identification • Fieldwork • Spare parts levels • Simulator changes • RWO reviews • Identification of problems or concerns • Post Mod Testing • Training • ERDS data points
Configuration Backlog Reduction • Preventive, Stakeholders Process • Design Change Packages • Function, failure mode, bounding parameters • 10%, 30%, 50%, 90% meetings • Impacts form required for mandatory stakeholders for meetings
Configuration Backlog Reduction • Preventive, Communicate & Hold Accountable • Email notices twice monthly to engineers • Packages in Closeout • Packages ready for Closeout – NFW • Packages with Implementation Complete, currently in Program Updates stage – FW • Escalate as needed, CRs after 90 days at AP7
Configuration Backlog Reduction So how are we doing so far?
Configuration Backlog Reduction • Questions? • Comments? • Thank you.