Industrial Health 47 (2009), 70–79

1. Safety climate and motivation toward patient safety among Japanese nurses in hospitals of fewer than 250 beds Industrial Health 47 (2009), 70–79 報告者：林秀芸

2. Contents 1. Study objective 2. Introduction 3. Methods 4. Results 5. Discussions

3. Study objective • Examine the relationships between safety climate and nurses’ motivation toward patient safety • Which dimension of safety climate would significantly affect nurses’ motivation to prevent mistakes?

4. Introduction • Safety climate (Zohar, 1980; Hofmann DA, 1996) • workers’ perceptions of safety • Influence workers’ motivation toward safety behavior • Many studies explored the association between safety climate and its outcome, e.g. safety behavior, accidents, and patient safety. (Cheyne et al., 1998; Masuchi A, 2002)

5. Safety climate dimensions • Industry (except health care) • Management/supervision • Safety system • Risk • Work pressure • Competence (Flin et al.,2000) • Health care (esp. patient safety) • Leadership • Policies & Procedures • Staffing • Communications • Reporting (Colla et al., 2005) • Organizational attitude & behavior • Communications • Workers’ committment (Masuchi A, 2002)

6. This study • Design of safety climate survey should depend on nations’ situation, such as career development, and public policy of health care. • This study developed a new safety climate scale. • Factor analysis  examine the association between the dimensions and “Nurses’ motivation to prevent mistakes”

7. Methods • Population: In Japan, most hospitals are small or medium-sized. • Subjects • Japanese • 6 private hospitals • nursing directors • 637 female nurses • January ~ May (2007) • Independent variable: nurses’ attributes & safety climate scale • Dependent variable: nurses’ motivation to prevent mistakes • Principal factor methods • Promax rotation

8. Methods • Population: In Japan, most hospitals are small or medium-sized. • Subjects • Japanese • 6 private hospitals • nursing directors • 637 female nurses • January ~ May (2007) • Independent variable: nurses’ attributes & safety climate scale • Dependent variable: nurses’ motivation to prevent mistakes • Principal factor methods • Promax rotation

9. Methods • Nurses’ attributes • Age • Job type (registered, licensed, assistant) • Marital status (married / single) • Children (with/without)

10. Methods • Safety climate scale (Kudo et al., 2008) • Exploratory factor analysis  confirmatory factor analysis  Cronbach’s alpha • Safety climate scale of this study (5-point scale) • Superiors’ attitudes • Relationships among nurses • Communications with physicians • Fatigue reduction • Opportunities for nursing education • Nursing conditions • Reporting

11. Methods • Nurses’ motivation to prevent mistakes • 5-point Likert scale • Definition • Near miss • Nurses’ incorrect practice was discovered before it resulted in patients’ harm. • Nurses’ incorrect practice was done, but it didn’t hurt the patients. • Mistake • Incorrect practice affected patients’ safety

12. Results –each factors construct

13. Results –each factors construct

14. Results –each factors construct

15. Results

16. Results

17. Results • Factors associated with motivation to prevent mistakes • Multiple linear regression analysis

18. Conclusions • This extracted 7 dimensions of safety climate by factor analysis. • Nurses’ motivation to prevent mistakes was significantly associated with reporting, nursing conditions, and communications with physicians. • Occupations of nurses and physicians is taken into account in this study. • Career development and public policy of health care may have great impact on safety climate.

19. Discussions • Reporting system is also introduced in other industry, such as aviation industry. • Staff can learn something about risks from report.

20. Thank You !