1 / 45

A Habits of Mind Framework Supports Knowledge for Teaching Geometry

A Habits of Mind Framework Supports Knowledge for Teaching Geometry. Rachel Wing & Mark Driscoll Education Development Center Newton, Massachusetts. Daniel Heck Horizon Research, Inc. Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

taima
Download Presentation

A Habits of Mind Framework Supports Knowledge for Teaching Geometry

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Habits of Mind Framework Supports Knowledge for Teaching Geometry Rachel Wing & Mark Driscoll Education Development Center Newton, Massachusetts Daniel Heck Horizon Research, Inc. Chapel Hill, North Carolina Research reported here is support by the National Science Foundation under Grant ESI-0353409

  2. Workshop Overview • Geometric Habits of Mind framework (G-HOMs) • Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • How G-HOMs and Fostering Geometric Thinking (FGT) materials support 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • Engage in FGT activities and consider the extent to which the G-HOMs framework supports the 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • How FGT field test addresses impact of G-HOMs-based materials on 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • Questions

  3. Workshop Overview Fostering Geometric Thinking • Geometric Habits of Mind framework (G-HOMs) • Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • How G-HOMs and Fostering Geometric Thinking materials support 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • Engage in FGT activities and consider the extent to which the G-HOMs framework supports the 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • How FGT field test addresses impact of G-HOM-based materials on 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • Questions

  4. Fostering Geometric Thinking (FGT) • Identify productive ways of thinking in geometry (G-HOMs) • Create professional development materials based on G-HOMs • 40 hours  20 two-hour sessions • Group-study materials • Structured Exploration Process (Kelemanik et al. 1997) • Stage 1: Doing mathematics • Stage 2:Reflecting on the mathematics • Stage 3: Collecting student work • Stage 4: Analyzing student work • Stage 5: Reflecting on students’ thinking • G-HOMs framework is a lens for analysis FGT is support by the National Science Foundation under Grant ESI-0353409

  5. Fostering Geometric Thinking (FGT) • Field Test Research Questions: In what ways does the use of professional development materials that target students’ geometric ways of thinking… • Q1: …increase teachers’ content knowledge and understanding of student thinking in geometry and measurement? • Q2: …affect instructional practice in geometry?  Knowledge for Teaching Geometry

  6. Workshop Overview • Geometric Habits of Mind framework (G-HOMs) • Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • How G-HOMs and Fostering Geometric Thinking materials support 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • Engage in FGT activities and consider the extent to which the G-HOMs framework supports the 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • How FGT field test addresses impact of G-HOMs-based materials on 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • Questions

  7. Geometric Habits of Mind (G-HOMs) • Seeking Relationships • Checking Effects of Transformations • Generalizing Geometric Ideas • Balancing Exploration with Deduction

  8. Seeking Relationship • Actively looking for relationships within and between geometric figures, in one, two, and three dimensions. • Relationships can be between/among: • figures • whole figures and their parts • concepts

  9. Which two make the best pair?

  10. Which two make the best pair? Internal Questions: “How are these figures alike?” “In how many ways are they alike?” “How are these figures different?” “What would I have to do to this object to make it like that object?”

  11. Geometric Habits of Mind (G-HOMs) • Seeking Relationships • Checking Effects of Transformations • Generalizing Geometric Ideas • Balancing Exploration with Deduction

  12. Checking Effects of Transformations • Analyzing which attributes of a figure remain invariant and which change when the figure is transformed in some way. • Attributes of the figure that may be affected by transformations include: • Orientation • Location • Area, perimeter and volume • Side lengths and ratio of side lengths • Angles

  13. A square’s diagonals always intersect at 90-degree angles. Is this true of a rhombus?

  14. A square’s diagonals always intersect at 90-degree angles. Is this true of a rhombus? Internal Questions: "What changes? Why?" "What stays the same? Why?”

  15. Geometric Habits of Mind (G-HOMs) • Seeking Relationships • Checking Effects of Transformations • Generalizing Geometric Ideas • Balancing Exploration with Deduction

  16. Generalizing Geometric Ideas • Wanting to understand the "always" and the "every" related to geometric concepts and procedures. • Generalizing progresses through stages: • Conjecturing about the “always” & “every” • Testing the conjecture • Drawing a conclusion about the conjecture • Making a convincing argument

  17. Connecting the midpoints of this quadrilateral created a parallelogram. What other quadrilaterals will this work for?

  18. Connecting the midpoints of this quadrilateral created a parallelogram. What other quadrilaterals will this work for? Internal Questions: "Does this happen in every case?" "Why would this happen in every case?" "Can I think of examples when this is not true?" "Would this apply in other dimensions?"

  19. Geometric Habits of Mind (G-HOMs) • Seeking Relationships • Checking Effects of Transformations • Generalizing Geometric Ideas • Balancing Exploration with Deduction

  20. Balancing Exploration with Deduction • An iterative and cumulative process that alternates between: • exploring structured by one or more explicit limitation/restriction • and • taking stock of what is being learned through the exploration

  21. Is it possible to draw a quadrilateral that has exactly 2 right angles and no parallel lines? Internal Questions: “What happens if…?” “What did that action tell me?”

  22. Workshop Overview • Geometric Habits of Mind framework (G-HOMs) • Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • How G-HOMs and Fostering Geometric Thinking materials support 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • Engage in FGT activities and consider the extent to which the G-HOMs framework supports the 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • How FGT field test addresses impact of G-HOM-based materials on 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • Questions

  23. Knowledge for Teaching Geometry Influenced by… • Our work developing the FGT materials and measures for the field test • Previous work on Connected Geometry and Fostering Algebraic Thinking Toolkit • Van Hiele (1959; 1986) model of cognitive development in geometry • Ball et al.’s (2001; 2003) work on Content Knowledge for Teaching Mathematics

  24. Knowledge for Teaching Geometry

  25. Knowledge for Teaching Geometry

  26. Knowledge for Teaching Geometry

  27. Workshop Overview • Geometric Habits of Mind framework (G-HOMs) • Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • How G-HOMs and Fostering Geometric Thinking materials support 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • Engage in FGT activities and consider the extent to which the G-HOMs framework supports the 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • How FGT field test addresses impact of G-HOMs-based materials on 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • Questions

  28. Knowledge of productive ways of thinking in geometry • FGT  G-HOMs framework • Language for thinking and talking about geometric thinking

  29. “If we could find the area of all the pieces and then take the square root…” Balancing Exploration with Deduction

  30. Knowledge of productive ways of thinking in geometry • FGT  G-HOMs framework • Language for thinking and talking about geometric thinking • Increase use of G-HOMs in problem solving

  31. Perimeter of A = Perimeter of B A B

  32. Perimeter of A = Perimeter of B = Perimeter of C C “Will the perimeter always be the same no matter how many mounds?” “Why is this happening?”

  33. Knowledge for Teaching Geometry

  34. Knowledge of how to promote productive, and potentially productive, ways of geometric thinking in students. • FGT  G-HOMs internal questions and emphasis on potential • Question students in a way that encourages G-HOMS

  35. Tangrams and Seeking Relationships • S: If you take the whole thing…there are 7 different parts of this (rectangle they’ve built). Some of them may be different shapes, different sizes, but they’re all equal to 1 part of this shape. • T: So, would you say then that they’re all 1/7th of the shape? • S: Yeah…well, no…kind of ‘cause like this (points to large triangle) could be 1/7th or like if you had a greater denominator it could be greater than 1/7th ‘cause it’s bigger than everything else. • T: So they’re not the same size pieces, but there are 7 pieces. • S: Yeah. And they’re all 1/7th of this thing, even though some are smaller than the others. • T: So this (small triangle) is 1/7th and this (large triangle) is 1/7th? • S: Yeah, because like this (small triangle) has to be at least 1/7th because you don’t really go into decimals and that stuff.

  36. Knowledge of how to promote productive, and potentially productive, ways of geometric thinking in students. • FGT  G-HOMs internal questions and emphasis on potential • Question students in a way that encourages G-HOMS • Capitalize on potential

  37. “B’s area is bigger” A B

  38. “Area of A = p x 3 x 3; Area of B = 2 x 6 x 6” A B

  39. But…“B’s area is bigger” A B

  40. Workshop Overview • Geometric Habits of Mind framework (G-HOMs) • Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • How G-HOMs and Fostering Geometric Thinking materials support 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • Engage in FGT activities and consider the extent to which the G-HOMs framework supports the 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • How FGT field test addresses impact of G-HOMs-based materials on 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • Questions

  41. Knowledge for Teaching Geometry in the Context of FGT Materials • Explore FGT problem: Dissecting Shapes • Reflect on G-HOMs’ ability to capture productive ways of thinking in geometry • Video of students working on Dissecting Shapes • Discuss how the G-HOMs framework affected how you analyzed students’ thinking in the video • How FGT would use this artifact with teachers to promote productive, and potentially productive, ways of geometric thinking

  42. Workshop Overview • Geometric Habits of Mind framework (G-HOMs) • Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • How G-HOMs and Fostering Geometric Thinking materials support 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • Engage in FGT activities and consider the extent to which the G-HOMs framework supports the 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • How FGT field test addresses impact of G-HOMs-based materials on 2 types of Knowledge for Teaching Geometry • Questions

  43. FGT Field Test • Groups randomly assigned to 2 conditions: Treatment (N=137), Wait-Listed Control (N=140) • Measures • Geometry Survey • Multiple choice geometry problems • Open-ended questions about approaches to a problem • Open-ended questions about analyzing student work • Observations • Extent to which lessons promoted G-HOMs • Extent to which teachers promoted G-HOMs • Extent to which students employed G-HOMs

  44. Questions?

  45. Contact Information Rachel Wing rwing@edc.org Mark Driscoll mdriscoll@edc.org Fostering Geometric Thinking website www.geometric-thinking.org

More Related