510 likes | 1.26k Views
Agenda. Check In Psychological Testing vs. Assessment Brief History of Assessment Contemporary Approaches to Assessment Grouping up. Check-In. Example: The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI).
E N D
Agenda • Check In • Psychological Testing vs. Assessment • Brief History of Assessment • Contemporary Approaches to Assessment • Grouping up
Example: The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) • Most widely-used personality assessment for normal subjects (More than 2 million administrations per year) • Based on the work of CG Jung • Variety of “forms” • M, G, Q • 93-222 items
Personality Types –The Why? • Self awareness • Career development • Team building • Academic counseling • Relationship counseling • Dealing with conflict
Uses of MBTI • Help clients understand themselves and their behavior/preferences • Appreciate others and their contributions • Make constructive use of differences
What Does the MBTI Do? • Identifies preferences, not skills • Open possibilities, not limit options • All preferences are valuable (does not identify good/bad) • All preferences can be used by each person
Self Awareness • Communications • Reaction to change • Conflicts • Leadership
Organizational Dynamics • Teambuilding • Coaching • Sales
Career Counseling . . . . • Contribution to the organization • Leadership style • Preferred learning style • Problem solving approach • Preferred work environment
Identifies Areas for Improvement • Potential pitfalls • Suggestions for development
Assumptions of Personality Typeology • Inborn tendencies • Comfort zones • Recognizable patterns • Change and adapt • Predictable responses • To Change • Conflict • Stress
IMPORTANT!!!!! • Everyone is unique • Everyone uses every preference sometime • We can all improve communications • Relationships will improve with practice
Extravert Sensing Thinking Judging Intravert Intuitive Feeling Perceiving Myers-Briggs Types Vs.
Common Wrong Awareness's • Extravert IS NOT “talkative or loud” • Introvert IS NOT “shy or inhibited” • Feeling IS NOT “emotional” • Judging IS NOT “judgmental” • Perceiving IS NOT “perceptive”
How you get and use your energy How do you restore your energy? Extravert - Introvert
E – People, activity, talking (external world) Readily takes initiative “Act first, think later” Enjoys a wide variety and change in people and relationships Very approachable Develop ideas through discussion I – Thoughts, feelings, writing (internal world) Think/reflect first, then act Needs “private” time to reflect One-on-one relationship or conversations Great listeners Enjoys focusing on a project Extravert - Introvert
Sensing (S) – Intuitive (N) How do you take in information?
S – Facts – real & tangible - now Carefully thought out conclusions Lives in the present “Do something” rather than “think about it” Fantasy is a dirty word Common sense solutions N – Possibilities – Inspiration - future Use personal feelings to make decisions Comfortable with fuzzy data Inventing new possibilities is automatic Sometimes considered absent-minded Sensing (S) – Intuitive (N)
Thinking (T) - Feeling (F) How do you make decisions?
T – Decision through logic and truth More important to be right than liked Viewed as unemotional Focus on tasks Provides objective and critical analysis F - Decision through emotion Follow hunch to make quick conclusions Sensitive to feelings of others Toxic reaction to disharmony, prefer to accommodate Takes things too personally Thinking (T) - Feeling (F)
Judging (J) - Perceiving (P) How do you organize your life?
J – planned, orderly, reach closure quickly Get things done Punctual Likes to use a list, make plans Structure and order Works best and avoids stress when keeps ahead of deadlines and not given too much information at one time P – flexible, spontaneous, stay open Lives for the moment Works well under pressure and deadlines Creative Multitasks Avoids commitments, it interferes with flexibility Judging (J) - Perceiving (P)
References • Essentials of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Assessment by Naomi L. Quenk • Introduction to Type and Coaching –A Dynamic Guide for Individual Development by Krebs-Hirsch & Kise
A (very) Brief History of Intelligence The concept of ‘intelligence’ is relatively new, unknown a a century ago, though it comes from older Latin roots Intellegere = to see into perceive, understand
19th Century • Jean Esquirol • Distinguished between mental incapacity & mental illness (“idiots” vs “deranged”) • Sir Francis Galton –The father of psychometrically based testing movement • Karl Pearson • Germans: Wundt, Ebbinghaus, Wernick, others
Importance of Binet-Simon Scales • The 1905 Binet-Simon stimulated the development of clinical psychology in the US and elsewhere. • Its success was a triumph of pragmatism; demonstrated feasibility of mental measurement and aided in development of other tests. • Led to public acceptance of testing and confirmed important consequences for education, industry, military and general society.
Controversy! • Some objected to the innateness bias, and suggested the term be replaced with • “General Scholastic Ability” • “General Educational Ability” However: this did not catch on as most theorists today advance a construct of intelligence that is independent of education.
Testing Practice and Influence Testing has become a common practice in the following: • Schools, clinics • Industry and the military Testing influences: • Public policy • Business • Scientific psychology
Defining Intelligence • Binet(1916) defined it as the capacity to judge well, to reason well, and to comprehend well • Terman(1916) defined it as the capacity to form concepts and grasp their significance • Pintner(1921) defined it as the ability of an individual to adapt well to new situations in life
Defining Intelligence (cont.) • Thorndike (1921) defined it as the power of goodresponses from the point of view of truth or fact • Thurstone (1921) defined it as the capacity to inhibit instinctive response, imagine a different response, and realize the response modification into behavior
Defining Intelligence (cont.) • Spearman (1923) defined it as a general ability involving mainly the ability to see relations and correlates • Wechlser (1939) defined it as the global capacity of an individual to act purposefully, think rationally, and deal effectively with the environment
Defining Intelligence (cont.) • Piaget (1972) defined it as referring to the superior forms of organization or equilibrium of cognitive structuring used for adaptation to the to the physical and social environment • Sternberg (1985) defined it as the mental capacity to automatize information processing and to emit contextually appropriate behavior in response to novelty
Defining Intelligence (cont.) • Gardner (1986) defined it as the ability to solve problems or fashion products valued within some setting. • Carroll (1997) IQ represents the degreee to which, and the rate at which, people are able to learn, and retain in long-term memory, the knowledge and skills that can be learned from the environment
So, is it???? • Adaptation to environment • Basic mental processes • Higher order thinking (reasoning, problem-solving, and decision making) • Metacognition • Executive processes
Or, is it??? • Knowledge • Interaction between knowledge and mental processes • Context (value placed on intelligence by a given culture)
Maybe it is. . . . .? • Abstract thinking or reasoning • Problem-solving ability • Capacity to acquire knowledge • Memory • Adaptation to environment • Mental speed
Or. . . .? • Linguistic and mathematical competence • General knowledge • Creativity • Sensory acuity • Goal directedness • Achievement motivation
Contemporary Approaches to Assessment? Assessment includes a broad array of evaluative procedures that yield information about a person. Tests (which are a component of assessment) yield scores based on the gathering of collective data.
Generally Speaking. . . The greater the number of procedures used in assessing an individual, the greater the likelihood that they will yield a clearer snapshot of the client.
Types of Assessment • Screening • Focused • Diagnostic • Counseling and Rehabilitation • Career • Progress Monitoring • Problem-solving
Four Pillars of Assessment • Norm-referenced measures • Interviews • Behavioral observations • Informal assessment procedures
Factors of a Multi-method Assessment The following factors must be considered: • Referral information • Demographic and background information • Assessment findings • Interventions
Foundation for the Assessment Process • Background • Selection of assessment measures • Administration of assessment measures • Interpretation of assessment measures
Steps in the Comprehensive Assessment Process • Review referral information –Frame the Question • Decide whether to assess • Obtain relevant background information • Consider the influence of relevant others • Observe the client in several settings • Select and administer an assessment test battery