1.22k likes | 1.39k Views
“Early Homo” -- The First Humans. Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 9th ed ., p. 215. Neandertals and Other Archaics. “Early” Homo and “Archaic” Homo ?. What’s the difference between. Neandertals and Other Archaics. “Early” Homo = Homo habilis 2.4 mya.
E N D
“Early Homo” -- The First Humans Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 9th ed., p. 215
Neandertals and Other Archaics “Early” Homo and “Archaic” Homo? What’s the difference between
Neandertals and Other Archaics “Early” Homo = Homo habilis 2.4 mya What’s the difference between
Neandertals and Other Archaics “Archaic” Homo = Neandertals and others ca. 300,000 ybp What’s the difference between
Neandertals and Other Archaics “Archaic” Homo = “Premodern Human” ca. 300,000 ybp What’s the difference between
Neandertals and Other Archaics “Early” Homo = Homo habilis 2.4 mya What’s the difference between
“Early Homo” Homo rudolfensis . . . (e.g., KNM ER 1470) 2. Homo habilis . . . Some people think there are two species:
Early Homo Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 8th ed., p. 252 (cf., pp. 215-217, 9th ed.: “We agree that more than one species is probably represented, but for simplicity suggest referring to all the [Plio-pleistocene human] specimens as ‘early Homo.’” “The species names Homo habilis and Homo rudolfensis are the ones most commonly used for designating two different species of early Homo.”
Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 9th ed., p. 268
Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 9th ed., p. 215
Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 8th ed., Fig. 10-30
Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 8th ed., Fig. 10-31
Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 8th ed., Fig. 10-29
Early Homo Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 8th ed., p. 252 (cf., pp. 215-217, 9th ed.: “We agree that more than one species is probably represented, but for simplicity suggest referring to all the [Plio-pleistocene human] specimens as ‘early Homo.’” “The species names Homo habilis and Homo rudolfensis are the ones most commonly used for designating two different species of early Homo.”
Genus Australopithecus Paranthropus Homo Species ramidus afarensis africanus aethiopicus boisei robustus habilis ( “early” ) rudolfensis ( “early” ) erectus sapiens Australopithecines - Homo
Traits 1. Are the first humans (Homo) . . . “Early Homo”
Traits 1. Are the first humans (Homo) . . . “Early Homo” 2. Are (sometimes called) Plio-Pleistocene hominids . . .
Traits 1. Are the first humans (Homo) . . . “Early Homo” 2. Are (sometimes called) Plio-Pleistocene hominids . . . 3. Are the earliest lithic tool makers . . .
Traits 1. Are the first humans (Homo) . . . “Early Homo” 2. Are (sometimes called) Plio-Pleistocene hominids . . . 3. Are the earliest lithic tool makers . . . 4. Had big brains
Cranial Capacity Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 8th ed., p. 234
Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 9th ed., p. 269
Traits 1. Are the first humans (Homo) . . . “Early Homo” 2. Are (sometimes called) Plio-Pleistocene hominids . . . 3. Are the earliest lithic tool makers . . . 4. Had big brains
Glossary Homo rudolfensis . . . Homo habilis . . . “Early Homo” =
Glossary Homo rudolfensis . . . Homo habilis . . . “Early Homo” = (e.g., KNM ER 1470)
Major Species one of two species of “Early Homo” inhabited South and East Africa 2.4 – 1.6 mya Homo rudolfensis –(KNM ER 1470)
Glossary Homo rudolfensis . . . Homo habilis . . . “Early Homo” =
Major Species one of two species of “Early Homo” inhabited South and East Africa 2.0 – 1.6 mya Homo habilis –(Olduvai, Koobi Fora . . .)
Selected Major Discoveries / Events, ca. 1850 - Present Homo habilis –(Olduvai, Koobi Fora . . .) • Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania • 700 cc brain • tool manufacture • 1.85 - 1.6 mya
Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 9th ed. p 185
Traits 1. Are the first humans (Homo) . . . “Early Homo” 2. Are (sometimes called) Plio-Pleistocene hominids . . .
Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 9th ed., p. 103