1 / 6

BGP Mux Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review

BGP Mux Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review. Georgia Tech PI : Nick Feamster Students: Valas Valancius , Yogesh Mundada August 22, 2010. Route Control: Transit Portal (TP). Give each service the illusion of its own upstream connectivity Custom routes and ISPs Sharing of numbered resources

talisa
Download Presentation

BGP Mux Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BGP MuxSpiral 2 Year-end Project Review Georgia Tech PI: Nick Feamster Students: ValasValancius, YogeshMundada August 22, 2010

  2. Route Control: Transit Portal (TP) • Give each service the illusion of its own upstream connectivity • Custom routes and ISPs • Sharing of numbered resources • Shared colocation and connectivity • Single contract with upstream ISPs • Amortizes costs of upstream connectivity. ISP2 ISP1 ISP3 Cloud Transit Portal Cloud Facility Virtual Router Virtual Router VoIP Service Streaming Service

  3. Milestone & QSR Status • Security reviews were not completed because the relevant parties never approached us. • Still working on integration INSERT PROJECT REVIEW DATE

  4. Accomplishments 1: Advancing GENI Spiral 2 Goals • Educational aspects of BGP Mux • Integrated BGP Mux into coursework • Problem Set posted and completed • Nine groups successfully completed • Integrating into graduate course this fall • BGP Mux software release • EGRE tunnel and node instantiation software release. • Deployment of BGP sessions in three locations • Demonstatrions at every GEC • Integration with OpenFlow-based campus network • Resource manager to be demonstrated at GEC 9 INSERT PROJECT REVIEW DATE

  5. Issues • Still waiting on IP address space. Cannot support more than 8 experiments without more address space. • Integration with Emulab is difficult because we do not have the resources to pay an additional programmer to work with that team. • Solution: They should take our reference manager and figure out how to integrate it. • Acquiring more deployment sites is practically a full-time job because it requires following through with operators. INSERT PROJECT REVIEW DATE

  6. Plans • Better integration with experimental environments (e.g., GENI, CoreLab) • Better interface to wide-area route control • BGP might be too complicated or heavyweight for many applications • Possible extensions • Back-haul between cloud facilities • IP prefix sharing • More deployment sites INSERT PROJECT REVIEW DATE

More Related