1.08k likes | 1.37k Views
Facility Design-Week12 Warehouse Operation. Anastasia L. Maukar. Warehouse Functions. Provide temporary storage of goods Put together customer orders Serve as a customer service facility Protect goods Segregate hazardous or contaminated materials Perform value-added services Inventory.
E N D
Facility Design-Week12Warehouse Operation Anastasia L. Maukar
Warehouse Functions • Provide temporary storage of goods • Put together customer orders • Serve as a customer service facility • Protect goods • Segregate hazardous or contaminated materials • Perform value-added services • Inventory
Elements of a Warehouse • Storage Media • Material Handling System • Building
Storage Media • Block Stacking • Stacking frames • Stool like frames • Portable (collapsible) frames • Cantilever Racks
Storage Media (Continued) • Selective Racks • Single-deep • Double-deep • Multiple-depth • Combination • Drive-in Racks • Drive-through Racks
Storage Media (Continued) • Mobile Racks • Flow Racks • Push-Back Rack
Storage Media (Continued) • Racks for AS/RS • Combination Racks • Modular drawers (high density storage) • Racks for storage and building support
Storage and Retrieval Systems • Person-to-item • Item-to-person • Manual S/RS • Semi-automated S/RS • Automated S/RS • Aisle-captive AS/RS • Aisle-to-aisle AS/RS
Storage and Retrieval Systems (cont) • Storage Carousels • Vertical • Horizontal • Miniload AS/RS • Robotic AS/RS • High-rise AS/RS (two motors)
Phoenix Pharmaceuticals • German company founded in 1994 • Receives supplies from 19 plants across Germany and distributes to drugstores • $400 million annual turnover
Phoenix Pharmaceuticals • 30% market share • Fill orders in < 30 minutes • 87,000 items • 61% pharmaceutical, 39% cosmetic
Phoenix Pharmaceuticals (cont.) • 150-10,000 picks per month • Three levels of automation • Manual picking via flow-racks • Semi-automated using dispensers • Full automation via robotic AS/RS
Warehouse Problems • Design • Operational or Planning
Warehouse Design • Location • How many? • Where? • Capacity • Overall Layout
Warehouse Design • Layout and Location of Docks • Pickup by retail customers? • Combine or separate shipping and receiving? • Layout of road/rail network • Room available for maneuvering trucks? • Similar trucks or a variety of them?
Warehouse Design (cont) • Number of Docks • Shipping and receiving combined or separated? • Average and peak number of trucks or rail cars? • Average and peak number of items per order? • Seasonal highs and lows • Types of load handled? Sizes? Shapes? Cartons? Cases? Pallets? • Protection from weather elements
Model for Rack Design • x, y are # of columns, rows of rack spaces • a, b are aisle space multipliers in x, y directions
Model for Rack Design (Cont) • In the relaxed problem, xyz=n x=n/yz • The unconstrained objective is
Model for Rack Design (Cont) • Taking derivative with respect to y, setting equation to zero and solving, we get
Rack Design Example • Consider warehouse shown in figure 10.29 • Assume travel originates at lower left corner • Assume reasonable values for the aisle space multipliers a, b
Rack Design Example (Cont) • Example 1: Determine length and width of the warehouse so as to accommodate 2000 square storage spaces of equal area in: • 3 levels • 4 levels • 5 levels
Rack Design Example Solution • Reasonable values for a, b are 0.5, 0.2 • For the 3-level case,
Rack Design Example Solution (Cont) • Previous solution gives a total storage of 24x29x3=2088 • Due to rounding, we get 88 more spaces • If inadequate to cover the area required for lounge, customer entrance/exit and other areas, the aisle space multipliers a, b must be increased appropriately and the x, y values recalculated
Rack Design Example Solution (Cont) • For the 4 level and 5 level case, the building dimensions are 25x20 units and 18x23 units, respectively • Easy to calculate the average distance traveled - simply substitute a, b, x and y values in the objective function • For 3-level case, average one-way distance = 35.4 units
Model Assumptions • 1. The available total storage space is known. • 2. The expected time a product spends on the shelves is known. This is referred to as the dwell time throughout this paper. • 3. The cost of handling each product in each flow is known. • 4. The dwell time and cost have a linear relationship. • 5. The annual product demand rates are known. • 6. The storage policies and material handling equipment are known and these affect the unit handling and storage costs.
Block Stacking • Simple formula to determine a near-optimal lane depth assuming • goods are allocated to storage spaces using the random storage operating policy • instantaneous replenishment in pre-determined lot sizes • replenishment done only when inventory excluding safety stock has been fully depleted • lots are rotated on a FIFO basis
Block Stacking (Cont) • withdrawal of lots takes place at a constant rate • empty lot is available for use immediately • Let Q, w and z denote lot size in pallet loads, width of aisle (in pallet stacks) and stack height in pallet loads, respectively
Block Stacking (Cont) • Kind’s (1975) formula for near-optimal lane depth, d
Block Stacking (Cont) • E.g., if lot size is 60 pallets, pallets are stacked 3 pallets high and aisle width is 1.7 pallet stacks, then • Verify optimality by checking the utilization for all possible lane depths (a finite number)
Block Stacking (Cont) • Several issues omitted in Kind’s formula. Some examples • What if pallets withdrawn not at a constant rate but in batches of varying sizes? • What if lots are relocated to consolidate pallets containing similar items?
Storage Policies • Random • In practice, not purely random • Dedicated • Requires more storage space than random, but throughput rate is higher because no time is lost in searching for items • Cube-per-order index (COI) policy • Class-based storage policy
Storage Policies (Cont) • Shared storage policy • Class based and shared storage policies are between the two “extreme” policies - random and dedicated • Class based policy variations • if each item is a class, we have dedicated policy • if all items in one class, we have random policy
Design Model for Dedicated Policy • Warehouse has p I/O points • m items are stored in one of n storage spaces or locations • Each location requires the same storage space • Item i requires Si storage spaces
Design Model for Dedicated Policy (Cont) • Ideally, we would like • However, if LHS < RHS, add a dummy product (m+1) to take up remaining spaces
Design Model for Dedicated Policy (Cont) • So, assume that the above equality holds • But, if RHS < LHS, no feasible solution • Model Parameters • fik trips of item i through I/O point k • cost of moving a unit load of item i to/from I/O point k is cik • distance of storage space j from I/O point k is dkj
Design Model for Dedicated Policy (Cont) • Model Variable • binary decision variable xij specifying whether or not item i is assigned to storage space j