290 likes | 377 Views
A tunable algorithm for collective decision-making by ant colonies. Stephen Pratt Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Princeton University David J.T. Sumpter Department of Zoology Oxford University. A. B. C. Do colonies trade off the speed and accuracy of decision-making?.
E N D
A tunable algorithm for collectivedecision-making by ant colonies Stephen Pratt Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Princeton University David J.T. Sumpter Department of Zoology Oxford University
A B C
Do colonies trade off the speed and accuracy of decision-making? Unforced emigration Forced emigration
In forced emigrations, decisions are faster… Unforced emigration Forced emigration 10 Time until completion (hours) Wilcoxon test, P < 0.001 5 0
In forced emigrations, decisions are faster… Unforced emigration Forced emigration 10 Time until completion (hours) Wilcoxon test, P < 0.001 5 0 …but less accurate 10 8 Number of colonies Wilcoxon test, P < 0.05 6 4 2 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Proportion of colony in good nest
Better nests experience more recruitmentand faster population growth
Quorum rule: probability of transport increases with site population
Searchers: Assessors: Recruiters: Passive ants: Recruitment decision model
Summary of individual decision rules • Quality-dependent recruitment latency • Faster population growth at better sites • Investment of time to gain information • Quorum rule for start of transport • Amplifier of recruitment rate differences • Error check on individual behavior
Speed/accuracy tradeoff Speed of emigration Proportion in good nest 20 20 Quorum size 0 0 1 600 1 600 Recruitment latency (min) 0 0.55 1.0 500 min
Investigation of individual behavior underlying tradeoff Unforced emigrations Forced emigrations Good nests Mediocre nests
ANOVA: p < 0.0001 Ants in forced emigrationsuse lower quorrum
Acknowledgements Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour Pew Charitable Trusts Human Frontiers Science Program