150 likes | 270 Views
Monitoring & Evaluation Of Delivering as One. By Cyra Syed M&E Coordination Officer RCO. High level Committee. Inputs from Donors, Government & HQ. United Nation Country Team. ONE UN M&E NETWORK. 5 TWGs & ITWG (PA) Joint Progress Reports and Joint Annual Work plans developed.
E N D
Monitoring & Evaluation Of Delivering as One By Cyra Syed M&E Coordination Officer RCO
High level Committee Inputs from Donors, Government & HQ United Nation Country Team ONE UN M&E NETWORK 5 TWGs & ITWG (PA) Joint Progress Reports and Joint Annual Work plans developed 21 TF (CA) Inputs provided for finalization of AWP and M&E plan 5 JPSCs Progress reviewed and AWP endorsed OMT & BH Joint AWP Developed and progress reports produced Oversight & Reporting Function
Role of M&E Network • Tools Development • Facilitation and Technical Advice • Knowledge Management and Database
M&E requirements of Key Partners • M&E of DaO at UNDG • One UN Report • Country led evaluations (6 pilots) • External Evaluation of DaO pilots • Donors consultations for One UN report • Progress review by JPSCsand HLC
Achievements of M&E Network 2008-2009 • M&E Capacity Assessment Exercise conducted • ToRs for M&E Network and Focal points Developed and endorsed by the Network • Templates and guidance note developed on Joint Progress Reporting, Joint Annual Work plan and Joint Monitoring Plan • Development of JP and OMT Joint AWP Facilitated • Mapping exercise of Agency Reporting conducted • Interface with DaO-MIS team
Status of Joint Report • None of the JP have completed the 6 monthly reports and the annual report is also due • JPSOs and M&E focal points were not extended the required cooperation by CAs and PAs for producing this report.
Status of Joint Annual Workplan • Each JP developed a slightly different model for WP • In all instance agency country plans have been developed first and then ‘joint exercise with PA’ • The average time to complete the exercise has been three months • The education JP model is a good model to follow which included engagement with CCI, PA, government, provinces. • What is missing in all instances is civil society engagement /input and appropriate consultation with CCI
Vision for DaO M&E 2012 Institutionalization of M&E by having: • One Workplan • One Monitoring and Evaluation Plan • One Review • One Report
M&E Events Planned • RBM Capacity Building Trainings • Launch of One Programme Workplan 2010 and M&E Plan • One Programme Mid Term review workshop • Workshop to Discuss the process of AWP 2011
UNCT Decisions Required • Dedicated M&E Capacities made available at PA/CA • Co-chairs provide strategic support and guidance for institutionalization of One M&E system; for e.g • Resources allocated by JP for M&E Activities. • Co-chairs/UNCT take collective decisions on JP Planning, Monitoring, Review and reporting. • UNCT review the half yearly reports/annual report by end February 2010.