REGIONALIZING GAP ANALYSIS DATA: LESSONS LEARNED, CONSEQUENCES EVALUATED

Jul 31, 2014

10 likes | 174 Views

MAP 1. INDIVIDUAL STATE MODELS MERGED. MAP 2. REGIONAL, OR BIOGEOGRAPHIC MODEL. REGIONALIZING GAP ANALYSIS DATA: LESSONS LEARNED, CONSEQUENCES EVALUATED Ree Brannon, Gap Analysis Program 530 S. Asbury St, Suite 1, Moscow, ID 83843 (abrannon@uidaho.edu).

tam

Download Presentation

REGIONALIZING GAP ANALYSIS DATA: LESSONS LEARNED, CONSEQUENCES EVALUATED

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

MAP 1. INDIVIDUAL STATE MODELS MERGED MAP 2. REGIONAL, OR BIOGEOGRAPHIC MODEL REGIONALIZING GAP ANALYSIS DATA: LESSONS LEARNED, CONSEQUENCES EVALUATED Ree Brannon, Gap Analysis Program 530 S. Asbury St, Suite 1, Moscow, ID 83843 (abrannon@uidaho.edu) Table 2. Comparison of Northern Oriole distribution between individual state models and a western range model.