710 likes | 722 Views
0. Chapter 8. Addressing the Obesity Epidemic: An Issue for Public Health Policy. Learning Objectives. Define the terms obesity and overweight as they apply to adults. Define the terms overweight and at risk for overweight as they apply to children.
E N D
0 Chapter 8 Addressing the Obesity Epidemic: An Issue for Public Health Policy © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Learning Objectives • Define the terms obesity and overweight as they apply to adults. • Define the terms overweight and at risk for overweight as they apply to children. • Describe the epidemiology of obesity and overweight among adults and children. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Learning Objectives • Explain how to assess and survey obesity and overweight in the population. • List and discuss determinants of obesity and overweight. • Discuss various interventions and intervention strategies for the prevention and treatment of obesity and overweight among adults and children. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Learning Objectives • Describe potential public health strategies to prevent obesity, including examples of current and proposed policies and legislation. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Introduction • During the past 15 years, obesity has emerged as a significant public health problem in both adults and children. • Genetics and societal and environmental factors contribute to the rising number of obese individuals. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Defining Obesity and Overweight • In adults, overweight is defined as a body mass index (BMI) between 25 and 29.9 whereas obesity is defined as a BMI greater than 30. • In children, overweight is defined as a BMI above the CDC growth chart criterion of 95th percentile whereas at risk for overweight is defined as a BMI between the 85th and 95th percentiles. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Epidemiology of Obesity and Overweight © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Epidemiology of Obesity and Overweight • Two national surveys from which obesity data is regularly obtained: • The National Health and Nutrition Examination Study (NHANES) • Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Epidemiology of Obesity and Overweight • The Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) provides the prevalence of youth BMI by state. • The data are self-reported and limited to high school students. • Mississippi and Tennessee reported the highest rates for overweight • Utah, Wyoming, and Idaho were the lowest © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Medical and Social Costs of Obesity • The Surgeon General’s Report (2001) estimated the total economic burden of obesity to be $117 billion in 2000. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Medical and Social Costs of Obesity • Obesity is costly to society because it is associated with chronic diseases including: • Cardiovascular disease • Type 2 diabetes • Hypertension • Stroke • Dyslipidemia • Osteoarthristis © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Medical and Social Costs of Obesity • Obesity is costly to society because it is associated with chronic diseases including: • Selected cancers • Gallbladder disease • Sleep-breathing disorders • Musculoskeletal disorders © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Medical and Social Costs of Obesity • Overall quality of life is often worse with increasing obesity, and obese people experience prejudice and discrimination. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Determinants of Obesity • Determinants of obesity can be related to either dietary intake or physical activity or both. • They can be genetic, psychological, behavioral, or environmental. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Determinants of Obesity • Referred to more frequently in the literature as causes of obesity are: • an “obesogenic” environment, or one that promotes obesity. • a “toxic environment,” or one that limits the opportunities for physical activity. • Excess weight accumulation occurs with an imbalance in energy, caused by either a surplus of energy intake or lack of energy expenditure. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Determinants of Obesity • Genetic Risk Factors • Psychosocial Risk Factors • Depression • Comfort eating • Behavioral Risk Factors • Caloric Intake • Types of Food Consumed • Physical Activity • Use of Television, Video Games, and Computers © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Determinants of Obesity • Environmental Risk Factors • Other Technological Innovations in Food Production and Transportation • Other Technological Changes • Portion Sizes • Eating Away from Home and Consumption of “Fast Foods” • Maternal Employment • Urban Sprawl and the Built Environment • Poverty © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Obesity Prevention and Treatment Interventions • In public health applications, interventions that address body weight are often preventive, rather than treatment, oriented. • The goal of an obesity prevention program is to maintain a stable weight and not increase body size over time, in contrast to an obesity treatment program, in which the primary goal is to lose weight over time. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Obesity Prevention and Treatment Interventions • Current recommendations for obesity treatment: • Lifestyle therapy - weight management techniques, increases in physical activity • Behavioral therapy - goal setting • Clinical therapies - pharmacotherapy, weight loss surgery © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Obesity Prevention and Treatment Interventions • Adult Interventions • Most adult-based obesity interventions have centered on clinical approaches to obesity treatment, and thus haven’t been largely successful. • Worksite health promotion programs have shown modest effects on weight in the short term. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Obesity Prevention and Treatment Interventions • Child and Adolescent Interventions • Largely implemented in the school environment • Tended to be most effective when they included a component of decreasing television viewing © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Public Health Policy Options for Addressing the Global Obesity Epidemic • Although obesity is a significant public health issue, efforts to control obesity at the public policy level in the United States are lacking. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Public Health Policy Options for Addressing the Global Obesity Epidemic • Obesity Surveillance and Monitoring Efforts © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Public Health Policy Options for Addressing the Global Obesity Epidemic • Awareness Building, Education, and Research • Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) • National Institutes of Health (NIH) © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Public Health Policy Options for Addressing the Global Obesity Epidemic • Awareness Building, Education, and Research (continued) • United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) • Federal Trade Commission (FTC) • Recent Legislative Efforts © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Public Health Policy Options for Addressing the Global Obesity Epidemic • Regulating Environments • The Food Environment • The School Environment • The Built Environment © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Public Health Policy Options for Addressing the Global Obesity Epidemic • Private Enforcement and Litigation • Personal Responsibility in Food Consumption Act (H.R. 339) • Commonsense Consumption Act (S 1428) © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Public Health Policy Options for Addressing the Global Obesity Epidemic • Pricing Policies • The U.S. Congress supports food industries, particularly agribusiness, through subsidies, price fixing, and price supports. • In response, price policies, such as subsidies and taxing, have been suggested as a way to reverse the obesity epidemic. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Public Health Policy Options for Addressing the Global Obesity Epidemic • Societal-Level Solutions • In general, low socioeconomic status (SES) groups are more likely to be obese than their high-SES counterparts in industrialized countries. • Upper SES groups are more likely to be obese in developing countries. • In developing nations, childhood obesity is most prevalent in wealthier sections of the population. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Public Health Policy Options for Addressing the Global Obesity Epidemic • Societal-Level Solutions (continued) • A primary goal of public health initiatives addressing the global obesity epidemic is to increase the consciousness in the non-health sectors of the potential adverse effects of their various actions on the ability of people to maintain energy balance. • Culture and education • Commerce and trade • Development • Planning • Transport © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Coordinated School Health Programs • Coordinated School Health Program - CDC model that views the school in a multidimensional fashion, in which all components at the school level work together to maintain consistent, healthful messages. © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Coordinated School Health Programs • Coordinated Approach To Child Health (CATCH) program • Probably the best example of a coordinated school health program that addresses both nutrition and physical activity © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Coordinated School Health Programs • Goals and Objectives • Overall goal = create healthy children and healthy school environments • Specific aims: • Encourage students to consume a diet that is low in fat and saturated fat and higher in fruits and vegetables • Encourage students to participate in increased amounts of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Coordinated School Health Programs • Goals and Objectives • Specific aims (continued): • Increase MVPA in schools to 50% of the physical education class • Provide food in school cafeterias that is lower in fat and saturated fat • Encourage parental participation in the school health program © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Coordinated School Health Programs • Priority Population • Target population groups: • Elementary school children and their parents • Elementary school teachers • School administration and staff • Main trial included a cohort of 5,106 third-grade students from 96 schools in 4 sites © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Coordinated School Health Programs • Rationale for the Intervention • Children’s diets were high in fat and saturated fat • Health behaviors track from childhood into adulthood • Therefore, changes in children’s diets/physical activity habits would benefit them in the future as well as in the present © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Coordinated School Health Programs • Methodology • Randomized clinical trial (main CATCH study) • Each of 96 schools at 4 sites was assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: • Control (usual health program) (n = 40) • School-based program (n = 28) • School-based program plus family component (n= 28) © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Coordinated School Health Programs • Methodology (continued) • Main trial followed by dissemination phase • Opinion leaders and change agents were contacted • Opinion leaders - people who influence other people’s attitudes about a program • Change agents - people who can influence decisions to implement a program © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth
Coordinated School Health Programs • Methodology (continued) • They influenced others to adopt the program or suggest legislative efforts • Partnerships formed between groups with the common goal of promoting school-based physical activity and nutrition programs • CATCH dissemination was measured using quantitative and qualitative methods © 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth