1 / 43

Marcela Ulate University of Miami

An intraseasonal moisture nudging experiment in a tropical channel version of the WRF model: The model biases and the moisture nudging scale dependencies. Marcela Ulate University of Miami. The MJO Case of Study. U850 Anom . ERA-Interim . TRMM. TIME. m/s. mm/day. LON. TRMM Precipitation.

tambre
Download Presentation

Marcela Ulate University of Miami

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An intraseasonal moisture nudging experiment in a tropical channel version of the WRF model: The model biases and the moisture nudging scale dependencies Marcela Ulate University of Miami

  2. The MJO Case of Study U850 Anom. ERA-Interim TRMM TIME m/s mm/day LON

  3. TRMM Precipitation NOAA OLR

  4. TRMM Daily Precipitation Anomalies (Filled Contours) and NOAA Daily Outgoing Longwave Radiation Anomalies (Line Contours: Blue negative anomalies, :Red positive anomalies).

  5. Model Description • WRF v3.2 • 1º x 1º horizontal resolution. • 28 vertical levels. • Tropical channel domain: Periodic Boundary conditions in the east-west direction. • Boundary Conditions form ERA-Interim data

  6. Model Physics: Microphysics: WSM3-class simple ice scheme Longwave Radiation: rrtm scheme Shortwave Radiation: Dudhia scheme Land Surface Model: Noah Land Surface Model Boundary Layer: Mellor-Yamada-Janjic scheme

  7. The Dry Bias in WRF

  8. WRFRH – ERAIRH The dry bias P (hPa) Days P (hPa) P (hPa) Lat Lon

  9. Approach to the problem: Humidity Nudging • Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation (FDDA) or nudging is the process where the model is set to converge at a desired rate to the analysis or observations. • The process adds an extra tendency term to the model equations proportional to the difference between the model simulation and the analysis value at every grid point, forcing the simulation closer to the analysis value.

  10. Humidity Nudging Model forcing terms Nudging Tendency term :analysis field value : nudging factor , : four dimensional weight function, From Skamarock et al. 2008.

  11. WRFRH – ERAIRH Reduction of the dry bias P (hPa) Days P (hPa) P (hPa) Lat Lon

  12. Grid Nudging

  13. Variations of Nudging Vertical Weight Function

  14. Above PBL Vertical FDDA Weight Function (Default) Z P Weight Function Weight Function

  15. Above PBL Vertical FDDA Weight Function High Z P High Mid Mid Low Low Weight Function Weight Function

  16. Fixed Vertical FDDA Weight Function High Z P High Mid Mid Low Low Weight Function Weight Function

  17. Grid Nudging: Vertical Weight Function

  18. Spectral Nudging of Humidity Analysis data (ERA-Interim) Spatially filter the data (minimum x,y wavelength) Nudging Tendency

  19. Spectral Nudging: Remove long wavelengths (small wave numbers)

  20. Spectral Nudging: Remove short wavelengths (high wave numbers)

  21. Spectral Nudging: Remove specific wavelength (specific wave numbers)

  22. Removing the short wavelengths (high wave numbers) improves the control simulations. • Mean and Long wavelengths are important in order to improve the MJO simulation. • The model “needs” to resolve the moisture large scales-structures well enough in order to obtain a MJO-like event.

  23. TIME LON LON

  24. “MJO LINE”

  25. Humidity Tendency due to nudging Humidity Tendency due to cumulus scheme - CONTROL g/Kg day-1 P (hPa) Humidity Tendency due to cumulus scheme MJO-like precipitation simulation g/Kg day-1 P (hPa)

  26. Heating Tendency - Control K/day P (hPa) Heating Tendency – MJO-like precipitation simulation K/day P (hPa)

  27. How much nudging is too much nudging? What if Ga=1 ?

  28. 6 year WRF Simulation (Same Configuration)

  29. NOVAPR MAYOCT Observations a) b) c) d) e) f)

  30. NOVAPR MAYOCT WRF a) b) c) d) e) f)

  31. ERAI, TRMM WRF a) b) c) d)

  32. Conclusions Spectral and grid Nudging of water vapor mixing ratio reduces the model dry-bias and allows the model to produce an improved MJO-like precipitation pattern and wind signal. The moisture at mid levels of the troposphere is crucial in order to reproduce the convective signal associated with the MJO. Without nudging, the cumulus schemes remain relative inactive i.e. lack of precipitation during the MJO event. This translates to a weak heating profile. When the MJO precipitation pattern improves, the heating profile resembles the results of other studies more closely. The prediction of the first MJO event improves when nudging is preformed, while the initiation of the second event is not for some cases. This suggests that improving the humidity field is one component of the problem, and we need to investigate further on this matter.

More Related