630 likes | 1.18k Views
Il Reclutamento Alveolare. Giuseppe Foti Istituto di Anestesia e Rianimazione Università di Milano-Bicocca dir. Prof. A. Pesenti Ospedale S. Gerardo Monza. Reclutamento Alveolare: riapertura zone collassate. PEEP 10. PEEP 15. PEEP 5. E’ la PaO 2 il miglior indicatore di Rec ?
E N D
Il Reclutamento Alveolare Giuseppe Foti Istituto di Anestesia e Rianimazione Università di Milano-Bicocca dir. Prof. A. Pesenti Ospedale S. Gerardo Monza
Reclutamento Alveolare:riapertura zone collassate PEEP10 PEEP 15 PEEP5 • E’ la PaO2 il miglior indicatore di Rec ? • E’ la PEEP il maggior determinante del Rec ?
PaO2 dipende non solo da quello che accade agli alveoli… • Cardiac Output • Emoglobina • VO2 • pH, CO2 • Vasocostrizione Ipossica (per es: NO) etc… Perché non misurare Rec dal versante alveolare ?
Chord Cpl Alveolar recruitment
Estimating Δrec by P/V curve analysis Assumes that FRC immediately equalizes coming from different PEEP
FRC is different coming from different Ventilatory SET UP !!
Vrec20 (ml) Vrec20,He (ml) 1200 * 1000 800 600 * 400 200 0 5 - 10 5 - 15 -200 Vrec20 underestimates, not homogeneously , Alveolar recruitment
Pneumonia Volume (ml) 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 All Δrec in ΔFRC !! 500 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Paw (cmH2O)
HOW TO MEASURE FRC ? IT WORKS ! IT’S NOT CLINICAL PRACTICE !
OXYGEN WASHIN WASHOUT Portable PC sidestream O2 analyser (OXIMON, Drager) (suction flow 200 ml/min). O2 analyser Gas sampling FRC
FRC = QO2 / ΔFeO2(Δ FeO2 min: 20%)QO2 = Q totale erogata – Q restituita al sistema – Q consumata FiO2 FeO2
SLOPE 0.953 INTERCEPT 53 r2 0.960 Controlled 4000 200 150 3000 100 50 0 Differences 2000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 -50 -100 1000 -150 -200 averages -250 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 WASHOUT vs HELIUM IT WORKS ! MAY BE CLINICAL PRACTICE in near FUTURE
PEEP keep it open Pplat Open the Lung Opening pressure Closing pressure Determinanti del Reclutamento alveolre 50 40 30 % 20 10 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Paw [cmH2O] Crotti et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001
Slutsky style • Pressure = 35-50 cmH2O • Time = 20-40sec, 1-3 manoeuvre • Mode: CPAP,APRV (lo vediamo nelle prove più tardi) • Check: BP,SpO2, on-line blood gas • If vanishing effect PEEP
15 12 10 10 7 Recruitment maneuver
Effects of periodic lung recruitment maneuvers on gas exchange and respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. Foti G.,Cereda M.,et al. Intensive Care Med 2000, 26 (5) 501-07
Effects of periodic lung recruitment maneuvers on gas exchange and respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. Foti G.,Cereda M.,et al. Intensive Care Med 2000, 26 (5) 501-07
Alveolar Recruitment and positioning PRONATION
Perché funziona la pronazione ? Cominciamo dalle cose semplici Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 161, Number 5, May 2000, 1660-1665The Prone Position Eliminates Compression of the Lungs by the Heart RICHARD K. ALBERTand ROLF D. HUBMAYR
PRONE SUPINE Diaphragm position andDistribution of ventilation
Oxygenation Response to a Recruitment Maneuver during Supine and Prone Positions in an Oleic Acid–Induced Lung Injury Model NAHIT CAKAR, THOMAS VAN der KLOOT, MELYNNE YOUNGBLOOD, ALEX ADAMS, and AVI NAHUM Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 161. pp 1949–1956, 2000 Prone + RMs effect Proning effect RMs effect RMs should be repeated following prone position
Diaphragm activity and recruitment controlled ventilation, NMBA spontaneous breathing
BIPAP PCV BIPAP vs PCV: Gas exchange Putensen et al. AJRCCM 2001; 164, 43-49
Set: BIPAP+PSV, Pmax = 35-40cmH2O Ti = 3-5 s. RRBIPAP = 0.5-1 b.p.m.
1sec. Start 1.5sec. 3.5sec. Dynamics of re-expansion of atelectasis during general anesthesiaRothen HU,Neuman p, Berglund J, Valtaysson J,Magnusson a and Hedenstierna G.British J of Anesthesia (1999):82, 4, 551-6 L’insufflazione deve durare almeno 3 sec.
Sigh improves tollerance to spontaneous breathing
Conclusioni: -Pao2 ma…. non per molto -Pplat per aprire -PEEP per mantenere aperto
SIGH Why SIGH during PSV ? Low PSV Muscle activity TV Derecruitment
End Inspiratory occlusion: PMI = Pel,rsi - (PEEP+PS) PMI = PMuscIndex Foti G., Cereda M et al. AJRCCM 1997
Prone positioning attenuates and redistributes ventilator-induced lung injury in dogs PRONE Alain Broccard, MD, FCCP; Robert S. Shapiro, MD; Laura L. Schmitz, MD; Alex B. Adams, MPH, RRT; Avi Nahum, MD, PhD; John J. Marini, MD CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 1999;27:2574-2575 SUPINE Prone position as “Lung Protective Strategy”?
What has been proven ? Prone - supine study
“The common theme of all the letter is that the use of prone position should not be descarded on the basis of the negative study by Gattinoni and collegues” • Slutsky • NEJM Vol 346, n° 4,Jannuary 24, 2002 pag 297
End Inspiratory occlusion: • Low PMI & low effort (A) • High PMI & high effort (B) Foti G., Patroniti N. Pesenti A. in “Tecniche di ventilazione artificiale”ed .Torri G.-Calderini E.
MV day7.1±1.5 1.0 ± 0.3 Est,cw10 ±2 6 ±1 Pao-Pes 19 ±3 29 ±2
Conclusion: 1) what stays open at end expiration depends on what has been opened at end inspiration 2) Adjusty PEEP to mantain recruitment
BIPAP PCV Respiratory mechanics Putensen et al. AJRCCM 2001; 164, 43-49
Recruitment maneuver and anesthesia FiO2 0.4 FiO2 1 Post induction Post recruitment 5’ 45’
Br J Anaesth 1993 Dec;71(6):788-95Re-expansion of atelectasis during general anaesthesia: a computed tomography study.Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G, Wegenius G, Hedenstierna G. Area of atelectasis (cm2) Ci vogliono almeno 30 cmH2O per riaprire le zone collassate
During OA injury PEEP trial
Legionella Pneumoniae Volume (ml) 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 All Δrec in ΔEELV !! 400 200 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Paw (cmH2O)
Ci = - FRC Vi Vi Cf Closed Dilution Technique Ci Vi Cf Vf Mass conservation FRC ?