1 / 15

Mid-cycle Review (MCR) & Library Review

Mid-cycle Review (MCR) & Library Review. Library Review. July - Sept 2011. Oct 2011 – Feb 2012. March - June. Summer 2012. Fall 2012. Overall approach. Engaged Open Iterative Evolving Listening Synthesizing Strategic & forward looking. Change 1.0 & 2.0.

tamyra
Download Presentation

Mid-cycle Review (MCR) & Library Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mid-cycle Review (MCR) & Library Review

  2. Library Review July - Sept 2011 Oct 2011 – Feb 2012 March - June Summer 2012 Fall 2012

  3. Overall approach • Engaged • Open • Iterative • Evolving • Listening • Synthesizing • Strategic & forward looking

  4. Change 1.0 & 2.0 “…What happens to learning as we move from the comparative stability of the twentieth century to a more fluid and dynamic new century, where technological innovation is inciting almost constant change?”

  5. Campus context • Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) • Foundational pillars • MCR - 3 key strategic goals • Campus narrative & story • “Life cycle” planning • Accountabilities framework

  6. The Library Review sets the stage for: • Annual planning & priorities process • Aligning our resources with our strategic directions • Integrating with campus directions & plans

  7. Campus Consultation Document • MCR 3 key goals • Mid-Cycle Review foundational pillars • 5 Life Cycle planning working groups • Library Mission Statement - redraft • Ongoing engagement & consultation

  8. Feedback – who we heard from • Executive Council members • Deans • Department heads • Faculty, students and staff • Four ARL and CARL University Librarians

  9. Feedback – what we heard • Our four strategic directions resonate • A focus on all four strategic areas is important • Alignment of Library’s strategic directions with the University’s MCR key goals is very good to see • Partnerships are key, e.g. in “online learning” • Our mission statement still needs work • Some things need clarification • Extent of engagement in Library Review is excellent • Ongoing engagement & communication are critical

  10. Frameworks • Strategic • Operational • Organizational • Accountability / assessment

  11. Moving forward • Implementation issues • Annual planning & priority setting • Priority setting • Framework for prioritizing • Strategic directions as touch-stones • Organizational structure issues • Assessment & accountability framework(s) • Communications framework(s)

  12. Some Next Steps • The Working Group Reports • 31 recommendations • Blend of strategic, operational, goals, etc. • Need to review & prioritize etc. • Create our story – and tell it! • Mission Statement - a crisp revised version based what we have heard • A succinct one or two pager

  13. Next steps • The report to the Provost will address • Strategic directions & mission statement • Key feedback • Next steps • Time frames/staging/etc. • AUL, Head Special Collections, Head of Acquisitions, etc. • Things we can do asap, sooner rather than later • Ongoing engagement & listening

  14. Sallie Ann Keller provided a brief presentation followed by a question and answer period

  15. Questions

More Related