1 / 6

SQL Server 2012 vs. DataKeeper

SQL Server 2012 vs. DataKeeper. Weighing your options…. If you answered YES to any of these questions you should seriously consider implementing DataKeeper Cluster Edition for your high availability needs in a Fusion- io Environment.

tamyra
Download Presentation

SQL Server 2012 vs. DataKeeper

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SQL Server 2012 vs. DataKeeper

  2. Weighing your options…. If you answered YES to any of these questions you should seriously consider implementing DataKeeper Cluster Edition for your high availability needs in a Fusion-io Environment • Am I concerned about the cost of SQL Server Enterprise Edition? • Do I use replication or log shipping? • Do I want to minimize the impact that replication has on the performance of my application? • Do I need to support Lync Server or other applications that use distributed transactions? • Do I need to ensure that SQL Agent jobs such as database backups, optimizations, DTS and others continue to run regardless of the node in service? • Do I need to ensure that SQL login accounts are kept in sync between cluster nodes? • Do I want to minimize my administrative burden ?

  3. DataKeeper is 85% Faster Than AlwaysOn Inserts Per Second (MAX)

  4. Log File (Write MB/sec) DataKeeper is 85% Faster Than AlwaysOn

  5. Cost Comparison – 16 Core System

  6. Disk Write MB/sec

More Related