1 / 13

Presentation REIMS III OTG

Presentation REIMS III OTG. Brussels, IPC 10 June 2009. Minutes from the previous meeting. No comments received Any comments? If not, Final minutes will be posted on IPC website. Feedback from the REIMS III S.C meeting 11 March. Sub-Agreement A

tan
Download Presentation

Presentation REIMS III OTG

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Presentation REIMS III OTG Brussels, IPC 10 June 2009 Presentation REIMS III OTG, Brussels 10062009

  2. Minutes from the previous meeting • No comments received • Any comments? • If not, Final minutes will be posted on IPC website Presentation REIMS III OTG, Brussels 10062009

  3. Feedback from the REIMS III S.C meeting 11 March • Sub-Agreement A • Supplementary Agreements aligning the floor rates with the UPU (TDs and IDM) • Annual results of the proportions sampling in 2008 (final TDs rates 2009) approved • IBRS 2010: Normal 40% of domestic tariffs for P; for Bulky 60% of domestic tariffs for E • Non-coloured envelopes, current decision remains untouched Presentation REIMS III OTG, Brussels 10062009

  4. Feedback from the REIMS III S.C meeting 3 June 2008 (1) • Sub-Agreement A Presentation REIMS III OTG, Brussels 10062009

  5. Feedback from the REIMS III S.C meeting 3 June 2008 (2) • If both Sending and Receiving PPO are signatories of Sub-Agreement A: • Level 2 not applicable • Compound rate at 77% of domestic tariffs • No proportions sampling • No changes in operational/accounting procedures Presentation REIMS III OTG, Brussels 10062009

  6. Feedback from the REIMS III S.C meeting 3 June 2008 (3) • If both Sending and Receiving PPO are Non-signatories of Sub-Agreement A both having asked for Physical segregation inbound and offering it for the outbound: • Level 2 is applicable • No compound rate • Level 1 @ 78.5% of domestic tariffs • Level 2 @ 75% of domestic tariffs • No proportions sampling • Changes in operational/accounting procedures (see below) Presentation REIMS III OTG, Brussels 10062009

  7. Feedback from the REIMS III S.C meeting 3 June 2008 (4) • If either the Sending or the Receiving PPO are Non-signatories of Sub-Agreement A and the sending chooses to offer or the receiving asks for Physical segregation: • Level 2 is applicable • No compound rate • Level 1 @ 78.5% of domestic tariffs • Level 2 @ 75% of domestic tariffs • No proportions sampling • Un-segregated (mixed) mail regarded as Level 1 • Changes in operational/accounting procedures (see below) Presentation REIMS III OTG, Brussels 10062009

  8. Feedback from the REIMS III S.C meeting 3 June 2008 (5) • Changes in operational/accounting procedures • No proportions sampling whatsoever • Current definition of Level 2 applies • Single IPK (L1 and L2 sampled in proportions) • New MSC code at dispatch level to be requested for L2 • Only accepts receptacles of the same MSC code • How include a distinguisher for Level 2 on the label? • Standard S47-1 for receptacle labels in Level 2 (rejected by the SC) • IPC trays for Level 2 • Other types of receptacles (e.g. pallets) possible on basis of bilateral agreements • What kind of tray for Non-Prio Level 2? Presentation REIMS III OTG, Brussels 10062009

  9. Feedback from the REIMS III S.C meeting 3 June 2008 (6) • Changes in operational/accounting procedures • To avoid bias in the gross to net weight adjustment, net weights for all mail (both Level 1 and Level 2) must be used when both L1 and L2 are in the same stratum • In cases where mis-segregation per Level is detected, issuance of a Verification Note is mandatory if the PPO wants to move the mis-segregated weight (whole receptacles) into the correct Level (Level 1). At least 10% of the weight of the mail in the receptacle has to be mis-segregated in order to apply this procedure. At the end of each quarter the weight of the mis-segregated mail will be summed up and moved to the correct Level • Level 1 or Level 2 could be included in the stratum for weighing purposes (dummy formats or dummy OE codes). The option of having different sample rates for Level 1 and Level 2 mail could be permitted. Bilateral agreement required. Presentation REIMS III OTG, Brussels 10062009

  10. Feedback from the REIMS III S.C meeting 3 June 2008 (7) • Changes in operational/accounting procedures • New forms (CN55/56bis, NO4bis) as proposed by Deutsche Post • CN31 with new MSC for Level 2 dispatches to be elaborated • Which solution for CN61? • Deutsche Post (new rows) or • IPC (new CN61) • New CN64 to be elaborated? Presentation REIMS III OTG, Brussels 10062009

  11. REIMS III and TP REIMS III OG • Do we really need to elaborate REIMS III and TP REIMS III OGs? • Sufficient with current REIMS OG + complimentary REIMS III provisions as a separate document? • REIMS III might not be long-lived… Presentation REIMS III OTG, Brussels 10062009

  12. Next meeting • In connection to REIMS II/East OTG in October Presentation REIMS III OTG, Brussels 10062009

  13. Any other REIMS III business Presentation REIMS III OTG, Brussels 10062009

More Related