1 / 13

LHC Phase II Collimator Compact jaw simulations

LHC Phase II Collimator Compact jaw simulations. New FLUKA => ANSYS mapping scheme New 136mm x 950mm jaw 60cm primary collimator Helical cooling channel / hollow core 360 o cooling / “solid” core. Mapping FLUKA => ANSYS Original Scheme.

tana
Download Presentation

LHC Phase II Collimator Compact jaw simulations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LHC Phase II CollimatorCompact jaw simulations • New FLUKA => ANSYS mapping scheme • New 136mm x 950mm jaw • 60cm primary collimator • Helical cooling channel / hollow core • 360o cooling / “solid” core

  2. Mapping FLUKA => ANSYSOriginal Scheme • 10x10x24 FLUKA bins mapped to ANSYS elements, one for one • Energy density of FLUKA bin applied to ANSYS element • Outer row of ANSYS mesh sized equal to FLUKA • On average, less volume in ANSYS model, therefore less tot energy • Bins with poorest match contain least energy

  3. Mapping FLUKA => ANSYSnew scheme & comparison ANSYS nodes located within FLUKA bin are assigned energy density of that bin

  4. Mapping FLUKA => ANSYSnew & old schemes compared • Peak temperatures generally slightly lower • Net energy deposit ~ same (previous slide) • Deflection up to 16% lower • due to different energy distribution (?) • Both models sufficiently accurate for engineering purposes

  5. Conceptual design - coolant channels beam water Limited cooling arc: free wheeling distributor – orientation controlled by gravity – directs flow to beam-side axial channels. Pro: Far side not cooled, reducing DT and thermal distortion. Con: peak temperature higher; no positive control over flow distributor (could jam); difficult fabrication. 360o cooling by means of helical (or axial) channels. Pro: Lowers peak temperatures. Con: by cooling back side of jaw, increases net DT through the jaw, and therefore thermal distortion; axial flow wastes cooling capacity on back side of jaw.

  6. Helical cooling passages – fabrication concept Preferred design due to fabrication ease, minimal weld or braze between water & vacuum • Tube formed as helix, slightly smaller O.D. than jaw I.D. • O.D. of helix wrapped with braze metal shim • Helix inserted into bore, two ends twisted wrt each other to expand, ensure contact • Fixture (not shown) holds twist during heat cycle Variations: • Pitch varies with length to concentrate cooling • Two parallel helixes to double flow • Spacer between coils adds thermal mass, strength • Fabricate by electroforming on helix

  7. New “Compact” Jaw • Original jaw: 150mm diam x 1.2m long • Won’t fit available space - limited by beam spacing • New jaw: 136mm diam x .95m long , including 10cm tapered ends • Tank 72mm wider & 22mm deeper • 45mm max aperture

  8. Simulations – Evolution of ANSYS model Water cooled 136mm x 25mm wall x1200mm long 136mm x1200mm long 3-d model FLUKA generated energy deposit mapped to blue area Water cooling: assume sufficient water that temperature is constant 360o complete I.D. cooled ~45o between arrows cooled => less distortion 2-d model 25 x 80mm grid FLUKA generated energy deposit at shower max “Solid” model Solid core => less distortion Cooling channel: ~45o arc between arrows (modeling expedient) Cooling applied to OD only of slot

  9. Evolution of ANSYS models 136mm x 950mm long 136mm x 950mm long 2x 5mm sq channels 53o cooling arc Compact geometry OD and length reduced to fit space constraints Water cooling: Various arc lengths modeled assume sufficient water that temperature remains constant Tubular cooling channels More realistic modeling of heat path Water cooling: Circumference of square tubes cooled – area equal to 53o arc 5mm sq tubes equivalent cross section to 6mm diameter Assume sufficient water that temperature remains constant

  10. Evolution of ANSYS Models 136 OD x 71 ID x 950 L beam Uniform ID Cooling Approximates effect of helical or axial flow Water cooling: assume sufficient water that temperature remains constant H2O simulation – helical flow shown Fluid pipe elements: Water temperature responds to heat absorbed from jaw More realistic simulation Axial pipes can simulate axial flow Friction can be simulated

  11. Compact (136x950) jaw variations - performance comparison 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

  12. Compact (136x950) jaw variations – compare simulation models

  13. Compact (136x950) jaw variations – compare design concepts • Preferred: helical flow concept • Pro • less water-vacuum weld/braze • Con • Excessive deflection – 280um SS • Secondary: beam side only axial flow concept • Pro • Less deflection – 63um SS • Con • More water/vacuum weld/braze • Mechanically risky flow distributor

More Related