Introduction

1. The Marine Stewardship Council: A Multi-Stakeholder Fisheries Assessment Programme for SustainableFisheriesOluyemisi Oloruntuyi(MSC)

2. Introduction • Concern at impact of fishing on environment led to establishment of MSC • MSC created as a result of green- business partnership • Integral aspect of MSC is its fishery assessment process • Challenges in development and implementation • Operationalisation of MSC and SIA methodology face similar issues • Improvement in assessment process based on experiences with practical implementation

3. The Marine Stewardship Council-Background • MSC is an independent, non-governmental, standard setting and accreditation organisation • Established to create a “reward system” for sustainable fishing • At the heart of the MSC is its Standard- “The Principles and Criteria of Sustainable Fishing”

4. The Standard • The State of the Stock • Ecosystem Impact • Management System

5. The Fishery Assessment Process Client decides to proceed with MSC certification Client selects a certifier Pre-assessment undertaken Confidential Pre-assessment Report produced Assessment report produced Certification Team assembled Fishery assessed Against MSC Standard Client decides to proceed to full Assessment. Peer review Decision on Certification made Chain of custody assessment Products from a Certified fishery carry the logo

6. IndicatorThe management system restricts gear and practices to avoid by-catch, minimise mortality of by-catch and reduce discards: • 100 Scoring guidepost There are specific measures in place to eliminate by-catch and discards in the management system • 80 Scoring guidepost By-catch reduction methods are part of the management system • 60 Scoring guidepost Specific plans are underway to incorporate by-catch reduction into the management system

8. Benefits • Potential for premium price • Improved supplier status • Entry into new markets • Confidence in stability of supply • Global recognition of management effort • Improvement in management of fishery • Potential to attract investment

9. Issues • Feasibility of applying universal Standard to all fishery types • Information/data requirements • Cost of certification • Auditing facilities • Low capacity levels • Stakeholder participation • Potential for trade implications

10. Addressing the issues • Most issues taken into consideration at MSC inception • Increasing levels of participation have highlighted other issues • Measures designed to address constraints influenced by need for accountability, transparency, non-discrimination and accessibility of programme • And Integrity and credibility of MSC Standard

11. International Picture • No universally agreed protocol for ecolabelling • Several principles have emerged from various international fora • FAO, OECD, WTO, UNEP, UNCTAD, ISO • Transparency • Accountability • Best scientific information • Conformity with international standards

12. FAO Technical Consultation on the Feasibility of Developing Non—Discriminatory Technical Guidelines for Eco-labelling of Marine Capture Products • Voluntary • Transparent • Non-discriminatory • Clear accountability • Conformity with international standards • Reliable auditing and verification process • Recognition of sovereign rights • Equivalence • Based on best scientific evidence • Ensure labels communicate truthful information • Provide for clarity

13. MSC aims to ensure consistency with internationally agreed standards and criteria such as FAO and WTO • Also to ensure that its main objective of contributing to sustainable fisheries is achieved • A balance of the above –guides the development of the MSC Programme

14. MSC Approach to the Issues • The MSC Standard-Conformity with international standards • Auditing infrastructure-Ensuring Independence • Stakeholder participation in the MSC-Transparency, accountability, effective communication • MSC Governance-Facilitating broad participation in the MSC

15. Stakeholder Consultation-Enabling excellent stakeholder input into MSC assessment • Proactive communication with stakeholders early in the process • Providing sufficient time for stakeholders to submit input • Continuous update of stakeholders throughout process • Creating sufficient intervention points for stakeholders to input into the process • Selection of team members • Providing information to assessment team • Selection of peer reviewers • Comment on draft report

16. Guidance documents-Ensuring clarity • Guidance manual for the MSC certification methodology • Guidance manual for stakeholder consultation • Guidance for assessment of small-scale fisheries • Client guidance document • Stakeholder document

17. TechnicalAdvisoryBoard-Integrity and Credibility of the MSC Standard • Financial assistance-Assistance to developing countries and other economically challenged fisheries • Chain of Custody- Ensuring truthful Claims, clarity of information

18. Information collection and analysis-Using the best available information • Cautious approach in absence of sufficient information • Ensuring credible evidence available in support of outcome • Maintaining proper balance between local site specific information and external knowledge • Maintaining accurate record of team discussions • Use of experienced and well recognised scientists • Peer review of reports • Extensive stakeholder input

19. Voluntary and Open access- Preventing trade barrier issues • Dispute resolution process-Accountability, trustworthiness, fairness

20. Conclusion • Any system involved in assessment of impact of on sustainability is bound to encounter various challenges • Conflicting perspectives of stakeholders need to be accommodated • Assessment methodologies need to develop and evolve, based on the need for objectivity and fairness to all concerned • And a need to ensure the overall goal of sustainable development is not compromised