1 / 17

Group 11- ASME Design Competition

Group 11- ASME Design Competition. Alicia Christie Desmond Bourgeois Toddrick Ruff. ASME Design Competition. Rule Update Rocks do need to touch receiving area 1 rock in each circle. Score S = Σ (R*t) +1000P - W - A - 1000T – 5s

tanner-walton
Download Presentation

Group 11- ASME Design Competition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Group 11- ASME Design Competition • Alicia Christie • Desmond Bourgeois • Toddrick Ruff

  2. ASME Design Competition • Rule Update • Rocks do need to touch receiving area • 1 rock in each circle Score S = Σ (R*t) +1000P - W - A - 1000T – 5s R = designated rock score t = target multiplier W = Weight of the vehicle in grams A = milliamp-hours available to the device according to the battery labels T = Times device touches border tape s = seconds to complete task, maximum 240 P = bonus for parking vehicle at end of task (1 = parked, 0 = not parked) Schematic of Test Course 2 – 1700 pt rocks 1 – 1600 pt 2 - 1500pt 2 – 1000pt

  3. Decision from Last Presentation 3 – Wheel Design Street Sweeper Mechatronics, Ariel University Center

  4. Design Concept rotate move

  5. r + 2*cos(30)*[r+s/2] = 3.75 in Wheel set distance D = 4r + s : if r = 1 in, s = 1.18 in, D = 5.18 in D*2 + 4 in (box size with guides in back) = 14.36 in with wheels and box touching Max length is 14.5 in

  6. Design Concept ?

  7. Final Design • Wheels are offset with front wheels on inside barrier barrier

  8. Idea for body expansion • Switch blades Approximate Extension Length

  9. Interim Prototype

  10. 3 Wheel Operating Principle Exploded View Assembled View

  11. Gear Force Analysis • Assumptions • Const. load with uniform shock • Const. mesh with no backlash • Axial load is negligible • Qv < 5, low pinion velocity < 13m/s • 99% reliability • Full-depth teeth with tip loading • Pressure angle 20º • Operating temps < 200º • Teeth form standard AGMA profile Radial Tangential Axial

  12. Gear Force Analysis Given Resulting Forces

  13. Rock Collector

  14. Free Body Diagram 1lb 3lb Position #1 • Assumptions • Weight of box = 2lbs • Weight of Front = 7lbs • Tipping will not occur on back wheel 3lb 2lb 3.5in 1.5in 5.9in 10.225in ∑M = ∑F*d M = 34.04 lb-in, moment created by rock collector would have to exceed this limit to tip over giving a negative moment

  15. Cost Analysis

  16. Cost Analysis Current Total: $943.70

  17. Future Plan • FEM Analysis to determine ways to remove material • Exact gear placement to minimize motor use • Power input and velocity calculations • Exact placement of wheels and expandable body to fit within size requirement • Placement of batteries and motors • Control configuration • Amount of motors, gears, other control components • Program control components

More Related