E N D
1. Using GIS to Aid Flow Prediction in the Yampa River Basin Shane Coors
April 16, 2003
CVEN 689
2. USBR Project Scope 12 month flow requirements per Colorado Department of Fish and Game at Green/Yampa Confluence
Decision Support for Flaming Gorge Dam
3. Project Goals I. Become Proficient with ArcView 3.2
II. Gain Familiarity with Yampa River Basin
Explore Hydrology of Basin
Explore Geography of Basin
Explore Climatology of Basin
III. Interface GIS with HEC-HMS
4. Presentation Outline I. Data Acquisition
II. Watershed Delineation
III. Melt-Out Date Analysis
IV. Problems Encountered
V. Remaining Tasks
VI. Potential Extensions
5. Data Acquisition 30m DEM – USGS Seamless NED interactive data retrieval
Basin Vector Data – Colorado Department of Natural Resources
Climate Stations
Flow Stations
Streams
Snotel Data - 30 year average SWE – USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
6. Delineate WatershedsThreshold = 2500 cells
7. Stream Delineation Results
8. Melt-out Date Analysis Melt-out Date is day that SWE=0
Proportional to Elevation
Varies with Aspect
MOD = 0 on April 1
Important because April - July flow is most critical
9. USDA Snotel Sites
10. Relating MOD to Elevation and Aspect MOD – based on 30 year average (April 1=1)
Elevation – from DEM
Aspect – from derived aspect grid
7 sites – *5 in the basin
11. Scaled Elevation Grid(0.0626*elev – 89.1357)
12. MOD Grid Output
13. MOD Grid Output
14. MOD Grid Output
15. Aspect and Elevation Dependence
16. Problems Encountered BIL = BAD!!!
1 – cell stream links
MOD data from graphical data – tabular unavailable
Grid Projections – ArcToolbox Projection Wizard
17. Remaining Tasks Create Basin File for input into HMS
Refine calculation of MOD grid (better data)
Convert MOD grid to integer and then to shapefile
18. Extensions Vectorize MOD Grid into complex polygon shapefile to calculate areas etc.
Correlate 30 yr average MOD with 30 yr average stream flow in basin
??????
19. Questions