1 / 20

FY 2012 Indicators for School Health Programs

FY 2012 Indicators for School Health Programs. Key Measures. National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention. Division of Adolescent and School Health. Presentation overview. Background of Indicators Condom measures

tarak
Download Presentation

FY 2012 Indicators for School Health Programs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FY 2012 Indicators for School Health Programs Key Measures National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention Division of Adolescent and School Health

  2. Presentation overview • Background of Indicators • Condom measures • Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning (LGBTQ) youth measures • Evidence-based interventions • Reported NGO assistance • Additional data on activities for youth at disproportionate risk

  3. Background • Annual process measures required of all funded partners • Collected through online tool • Reported by SEAs, TEAs, and LEAs funded for HIV Prevention and SEAs funded for Coordinated School Health • SEAs & TEAs funded for HIV Prevention presented here • Revised heavily for FY 2011 • All SLIMs have corresponding Indicator • FY 2012 questions only comparable to FY 2011 • But comparisons limited due to end of funding cycle

  4. Response Rates for SEAs and TEAs funded for HIV Prevention • SEAs • Includes District of Columbia • Missouri, Nevada, and Utah not funded in FY 2012 • 48 of 48 sites (100%) responded • TEAs • American Samoa, Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, Marshall Islands, Palau, and Puerto Rico in FY 2012 • 5 of 6 sites (83.3%) responded • Marshall Islands did not respond • Cherokee Nation funded in FY 2012 and included in totals but not as SEA or TEA

  5. Condom-related measures

  6. SEAs and TEAs that emphasized how to obtain condoms in guidance, curricula, professional development (PD), or technical assistance (TA) for students in grades 9-12 Yes No No Response Not Funded American Samoa Palau Cherokee Nation Puerto Rico N Mariana Islands Dist. of Columbia Guam Marshall Islands

  7. SEAs and TEAs that emphasized how to correctly use a condom in guidance, curricula, professional development (PD), or technical assistance (TA) for students in grades 9-12 Yes No No Response Not Funded American Samoa Palau Cherokee Nation Puerto Rico N Mariana Islands Dist. of Columbia Guam Marshall Islands

  8. LGBTQ Activities

  9. SEAs and TEAs that conducted activities to address the needs of LGBTQ youth Yes No No Response Not Funded American Samoa Palau Cherokee Nation Puerto Rico N Mariana Islands Dist. of Columbia Guam Marshall Islands

  10. SEAs and TEAs that conducted activities to increase the capacityof districts and schools to foster parental acceptance and support for LGBTQ youth Yes No No Response Not Funded American Samoa Palau Cherokee Nation Puerto Rico N Mariana Islands Dist. of Columbia Guam Marshall Islands

  11. SLIM 10: LGBTQ Activities

  12. Evidence-based interventions

  13. SEAs and TEAs that provided PD on specific HIV prevention education curricula from a list of the Office of Adolescent Health (OAH) evidence-based programs and youth-focused DEBIs Yes No No Response Not Funded American Samoa Palau Cherokee Nation Puerto Rico N Mariana Islands Dist. of Columbia Guam Marshall Islands

  14. EBIs for which PD was provided • Partners reported conducting PD on 21 of the 38 curricula on the OAH list & youth-focused DEBIs • Top five curricula • Reducing the Risk: 17 (24.3%) • Making a Difference! 8 (11.4%) • Be Proud! Be Responsible!: 6 (8.6%) • Draw the Line/Respect the Line: 6 (8.6%) • Safer Choices: 6 (8.6%) • Substantial variation in selected EBIs • 20 EBIs not selected by any site • Only 8 curricula selected by 3 or more sites

  15. Reported NGO assistance

  16. Partners who received PD or TA from CDC-funded NGOs • 43 partners (61.4%) received PD or TA from at least one CDC-funded NGO • 26 (54.2%) SEAs, 15 (93.8%) LEAs, 2 (40.0%) TEAs • Top five NGOs that provided PD or TA • ETR Associates: 22 (31.4%) • Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network: 18 (25.7%) • Advocates for Youth: 16 (22.9%) • National Coalition of STD Directors: 14 (20.0%) • Healthy Teen Network: 9 (12.9%)

  17. SEAs and TEAs that received PD or TA from Gay-Straight Alliance Network Yes No No Response Not Funded American Samoa Palau Cherokee Nation Puerto Rico N Mariana Islands Dist. of Columbia Guam Marshall Islands

  18. Additional DATA on reaching youth at disproportionate risk

  19. SEAs and TEAs that conducted activities to address the needs of youthin correctional institutions and alternative settings Yes No No Response Not Funded American Samoa Palau Cherokee Nation Puerto Rico N Mariana Islands Dist. of Columbia Guam Marshall Islands

  20. Homeless youth • In FY 10, New Mexico, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, and Philadelphia included a response that mentioned “homeless” youth • In FY 11, only Tennessee specified “homeless” youth • In FY 12, no SEA or TEA specificed “homeless” youth

More Related