1 / 11

A Glance Back

A Glance Back. We have made significant progress in spite of significant financial challenges created from: Declining state appropriations Pressure to minimize/cap tuition increases Increasing unfunded mandates Increasing federal and state operating regulations Increasing fixed costs

taro
Download Presentation

A Glance Back

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Glance Back • We have made significant progress in spite of significant financial challenges created from: • Declining state appropriations • Pressure to minimize/cap tuition increases • Increasing unfunded mandates • Increasing federal and state operating regulations • Increasing fixed costs • Healthcare and retirement benefits • Utilities and Technology • We made improvements or held stable 40 of 54 Key Performance Indicators that were identified to measure progress in the 2010-2014 ASPIRE Strategic Plan • Fall 2013 Enrollment 11,358 with 1,675 FTFR • Average FTFR ACT 22.2 (record high)

  2. CPE Public Agenda (Written in Support of HB1) Aspire to Greatness: MSU Strategic Plan 2010-2014 Strategic Planning “Plan our Work and Work our Plan” y M O R E H E A D S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y Progress in Partnerships Academic and Administrative Unit Plans Six-Year Capital Plan Campus Master Plan Enrollment Management Plan Technology Plan Diversity Plan Marketing Plan MSU Operating Budget

  3. Primary Areas for Immediate Improvement(Based on Early Planning Results) Operating • Central Advising Model • Improved Processes and Efficiencies through Technology • Employee Compensation Plan • Market Salaries (3 year phase in) • Performance Component (under development by committee) Capital • IT Infrastructure • Electrical Infrastructure • Residence Halls (600 beds on campus / 50 beds at DAC) • Parking Structures • Expanded and Updated Food Service Facilities

  4. State Budget Forecast 2014-15 $246 million

  5. Source and Uses of Funds (2013-14)($144 million)

  6. $12,865 / FTE $12,116 / FTE • State Appropriation revenue as a percentage of E&G budget continues to decline • $7.2 million reduction since 2007-08 through 2013-14 Total of State Appropriations and Tuition Revenue per student FTE (net of institutionally funded scholarships and adjusted 2% annually for inflation)

  7. Two Options to Improve our Budget • Increase Revenue • State Appropriations – not without major state tax reform • Significant Additional Enrollment Growth – unrealistic expectation • Retention improvements – within our control • Decrease Expenses • Personnel – 57% • Operating – 20% • Scholarships – 13% • Other – 10%

  8. How Can We Continue to Improve under even more challenging financial pressure? • Focus on things we CAN control • Enrollment and Retention • Use of Private Funds • Operating Efficiencies and Productivity • Full equitable employment for all personnel

  9. Full-Time Employee Count, Student Count and Credit Hour Production 2003 - 2012

  10. Action Items • Achieve a stable retention rate of FTFR at 80% within two years • Be “Student Centric” in all we do • Stabilize enrollment between 11,000 – 12,000 • Implement a student-focused centralized scheduling system • Implement technology to develop more efficient and effective institutional processes • Identify where shared support services can reduce operating overhead • Develop a strategic direction: • Online instruction • Regional Campus Centers • Max impact for our region (SOAR)

More Related