1 / 64

P REDICTION O F F RONTOGENETICALLY F ORCED P RECIPITATION B ANDS

P REDICTION O F F RONTOGENETICALLY F ORCED P RECIPITATION B ANDS. PETER C. BANACOS NWS / Storm Prediction Center WDTB Winter Weather Workshop IV Boulder, CO ~ 23 July 2003. O UTLINE. Frontogenesis …where it fits in the forecast process kinematics and dynamics of frontogenesis

tate-olson
Download Presentation

P REDICTION O F F RONTOGENETICALLY F ORCED P RECIPITATION B ANDS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PREDICTIONOFFRONTOGENETICALLYFORCEDPRECIPITATIONBANDS PETER C. BANACOS NWS / Storm Prediction Center WDTB Winter Weather Workshop IV Boulder, CO ~ 23 July 2003

  2. OUTLINE • Frontogenesis • …where it fits in the forecast process • kinematics and dynamics of frontogenesis • synoptic pattern recognition • Case #1 – examine band formation • Mesoscale Banding Characteristics • modulation by local wind profile • col point aloft • modulation by stability • Case #2 – numerical model considerations

  3. INGREDIENTSBASEDFORECASTING • Purpose: To focus the forecaster on the necessary conditions (“ingredients”) needed for a specific meteorological event to take place. • Frontogenesis is a lifting/forcing mechanism.

  4. Frontogenesis (definition) (S. Petterssen 1936) • The 2-D scalar frontogenesis function (F ) – quantifies the change in horizontal (potential) temperature gradient following air parcel motion : • F > 0 frontogenesis, F < 0 frontolysis • Conceptually, the local change in horizontal temperature gradient near an existing front, baroclinic zone, or feature as it moves.

  5. Vector Frontogenesis Function (Keyser et al. 1988, 1992) • Change in magnitude • Corresponds to vertical motion on the frontal scale (mesoscale bands) • Change in direction (rotation) • Corresponds to vertical motion on the scale of the baroclinic wave itself • F is of fundamental importance… • Galilean invariant • full wind generalization of the quasi-geostrophic Q-vector

  6. Kinematics of Frontogenesis • The geometry of the horizontal flow has a first-order influence on F in most situations. Examine separate contributions of horizontal divergence, deformation, and vorticity to the field of frontogenesis. • Note: Will focus exclusively on the Petterssen 2-D scalar frontogenesis (Fn)

  7. Horizontal Divergence • Divergence (Convergence) acts frontolytically (frontogenetically), always, irrespective of isotherm orientation. F<0 F>0

  8. Horizontal Deformation Flow fields involving deformation acting frontogenetically are prominent in the majority of banded precipitation cases. F>0

  9. Horizontal Deformation (cont.) F<0 Need to consider orientation of isotherms relative to axis of dilatation.

  10. Vertical Vorticity Pure vorticity acts to rotate isotherms, cannot tighten or weaken them. F=0

  11. Other Contributing Factors to Frontogenesis The kinematic field, and deformation in particular, plays the most prominent role in the 2-D frontogenesis aloft. Other processes such as diabatic heating and tilting effects may also contribute to frontogenesis. • Examples: • differential solar heating • Latent heating with convective motions (documented in coastal frontogenesis process).

  12. Dynamics of Frontogenesis (vertical circulation) Flow field dominated by deformation.

  13. Dynamics of Frontogenesis (cont.) Ageostrophic circulation develops as a response to increasing temperature gradient.

  14. Dynamics of Frontogenesis (cont.) • When we talk about frontogenesis forcing, it’s the resulting ageostrophic circulation we are most interested in for precipitation forecasting.

  15. Forecasting Applications

  16. Use of Frontogenesis in Forecasting • Presence of F in 850-500mb layer can help diagnose and predict areas of heavy banded precipitation. • Potential for banding can be assessed using F field in numerical models, with placement of banding refined in <12 hour period. • New graphic forecast tools allow location of banded precipitation to be conveyed to the user.

  17. Common Synoptic Patterns • Forecast premise for mesoscale banding: • Requires a strengthening baroclinic zone in the presence of sufficient moisture for precipitation (AND – for snow, the proper thermal stratification). • Large-scale deformation zones are BY FAR AND AWAY the most common means of manifesting areas of frontogenesis within the 850-500mb layer. • Does NOT require a strong surface cyclone, only a low-mid tropospheric baroclinic zone TWO CLASSES OF BANDS: • Bands associated with surface cyclogenesis • Bands not associated with surface cyclogenesis

  18. I. CYCLOGENETIC PATTERN NW of surface cyclone --“wrap around precipitation” Mature Stage Decaying Stage

  19. Northwest of Strong Cyclone 1/6/02

  20. Snowfall Accumulations

  21. II. Frontal / Weak Cyclogenesis Pattern • Confluent flow ~700mb in advance of a positive tilt trough. • Weak or non-existent surface wave cyclone along surface front. • Seems to be most common in the Central and Northern Plains with quasi-stationary arctic boundaries.

  22. Within Strong E-W Frontal Zone3/13/02

  23. Example Case of Frontogenesis and Banded Precipitation Date: 15 October 2001 (Case #1) • Narrow band (1-2 counties wide) of moderate to heavy rainfall from eastern KS to central IL. • Associated with weak surface features but a moderately strong baroclinic zone and frontogenesis forcing.

  24. 700mb 00z 15 OCT 01

  25. Surface 15 OCT 2001 00z 12z

  26. 925mb 12z 15 OCT 01 Large-scale deformation field - eastern KS and western MO

  27. 18z 15 OCT 01 18z mosaic base reflectivity and surface observations 18z 600mb Frontogenesis

  28. Rainfall rates between 0.10” and 0.25” occurred for a 6 hour period from 15-20z. • Moderate to heavy precipitation can persist longer (12+ hours) with slower moving systems or mature extratropical cyclones.

  29. Topeka, KS 12z 15 OCT 01

  30. 700mb Frontogenesis / Base Reflectivity 0 hr ETA 12z 6 hr ETA 18z 1150z 1805z • Organization of precipitation increases as F orientation becomes aligned with isotherm orientation at lower levels.

  31. Sloped Continuity of F 600 mb 6hr ETA forecast valid 18z 15 OCT 01 700 mb 850 mb • Presence of parallel axes of positive frontogenesis sloping upward toward colder air is a common aspect of heavy banded precipitation areas.

  32. Sloped Continuity of F The plane of the cross-section should be taken perpendicular to the mid-level (850-500mb) thermal wind vector or thickness lines.

  33. Sloped Continuity of Frontogenesis Forcing (cont.) • The previous two slides have several important implications: • Several levels (or a x-section) should be assessed for spatial continuity and orientation of F, to see if banding is likely to occur at a given time. • Vertical averaging should probably be avoided. • The sloped continuity tells us something about the structure of the wind field we can use to infer frontogenesis from single sounding (observed or model derived), VAD, or wind profiler data, and large-scale flow fields.

  34. Role of Deep-Layer Shear Profile Nature of environmental wind profile may be conducive to “seeder-feeder” mechanism and rapid precipitation generation / elongation of bands during initial development phase.

  35. Role of Deep-Layer Shear (cont.) Martin (1998) • Note banding orientation (parallel to isentropes / isotherms).

  36. Vertical Wind Profile and banding Idealized Hodographs:  Col point aloft

  37. Mesoscale Band Variations • Band movement (short and long-axis translation) • Warm season vs. cool season bands • Multiple parallel bands (stability driven) • - Non-banded (the “null wind structure”)

  38. Banded – Cold Season 3-10Z 12/29/02

  39. Mosaic Radar 8z 12/29/02 • RUC 2h frontogenesis forecast 850mb

  40. 1.5o Base Velocity / VAD – Spokane, WA0854z 12/29/02 Frontogenesis coincident with col point / straight shear

  41. Banded – Warm Season 12Z 6/27/01 Training thunderstorms, in gravitationally unstable environment VIS 1500Z TLX 1459Z

  42. Banded – Translation along short axisNorth Dakota 0256z 1/26/03 Two problems for heavy precip: Moisture starved, and moving fast

  43. Non-Banded 0256z 12/25/02

  44. Non-Banded 0256z 12/25/02 Note strong curvature to the shear vector with height. This tends to preclude coherent banding, even in the presence of frontogenesis.

  45. Banded- Multiple 11/09/00 Montgomery Co.  INX 0903Z Unlike Case #1, this case shows narrow multiple banded precipitation. Lower stability likely played a role.

  46. 700-500mb Lapse Rate Comparison SGF 12z 11/09/00 TOP 12z 10/15/01 7.8 C/km 4.5 C/km Near neutral or unstable lapse rates (with respect to a moist adiabat) implies multiple narrow and intense (maybe 5-10 km or so in width), bands. Resulted in 2-3”/hr snowfall rates on Nov 9, 2000.

  47. Modulation of Band Intensity by Instability for a constant value of F As gravitational or symmetric stability decreases, the horizontal scale of the band decreases while the intensity of the band increases. Multiple bands become established in an unstable regime.

  48. UsingEPVto Measure Stability • EPV = Equivalent Potential Vorticity • A relatively simple, quick, and effective way to evaluate CSI/MSI. Gravitational instability may also be present. • Defined by Moore and Lambert (1993) as follows: (TERM 1) (TERM 2) • The closer EPV is to zero, the more responsive the atmosphere will be to a given amount of forcing. • IF EPV<0 , then CSI/MSI is present. Overlaying EPV with theta-e is an effective way to determine if convective (gravitational) instability also exists.

  49. Using EPV to Measure Stability An example from Moore and Lambert (1993)

  50. Frontogenesis and Symmetric Instability

More Related