1 / 12

Resolusi kOnflik Global: Suatu pengantar Komprehensif

Resolusi kOnflik Global: Suatu pengantar Komprehensif. Muhammad Nizar Ziyad Falahi. Perspectives. Classic Ideas: Very high priority to defending one’s own interest causes conflict Two parties causes win-lose conflict ex: Prisoners dilemma and game theory

tatyana-watkins
Download Presentation

Resolusi kOnflik Global: Suatu pengantar Komprehensif

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Resolusi kOnflik Global: Suatu pengantar Komprehensif Muhammad Nizar ZiyadFalahi

  2. Perspectives • Classic Ideas: Very high priority to defending one’s own interest causes conflict • Two parties causes win-lose conflict ex: Prisoners dilemma and game theory • Third party and the emerge of mediation • Symmetric and asymmetric conflict • Singer’s conflict typology and Holsti. • Regional pattern of conflict.

  3. Terminology • Conflict  the pursuit of incompatible goals by different groups. • Armed Conflict • Violent conflict/deadly conflict • Contemporary conflict • Conflict settlement • Conflict management • Conflict transformation • Negotiation • Peacemaking, peacekeeping, & peace building. • Conflict resolution

  4. Phases in the Dev of CR FieldL. Kriesberg • 1914 – 45 : Precursors • WW1&2 (full of emotions) Large Scale Conflict, • class-based struggles, particularly revolutions, • organization conflict (labor management relations), • social-psychology, • symmetries Conflict

  5. 1946 – 69 : Early Efforts and Basic Research • Journal of Conflict Resolution (1957) & the Center for Conflict Resolution (1959), • Quantitative Data, • institution and cooperative activities, • Game Theory (Tit for Tat), the Prisoner’s Dilemma, GRIT (Graduated-Reciprocation in Tension-Reduction). • traditional diplomacy, • sociologist, anthropologist.

  6. 1970 – 85 : Crystallization and Expansion • as social movements (practice in art: mediation, negotiation, peacemaking, etc). • CR ideas arising from research and theory provided a theoretical basis and intellectual justification for CR practices. • CR work in many parts of the world. • Non violent actions. • Feminist Contribution for CR work. • Game Theory & GRIT. • 1986 – Present : Extension, Diffusion, and Institutionalization

  7. School of Tough • American Pragmatis : emphasize interest as the major factor • English school: not only interest, but ethics is also important

  8. Foundation • Presented by Johan galtung (marxist ) • Concern about structural factor • Direct Violence, Structural Violence or cultural Violence • Transnational approach • Needs Theory

  9. Construction • Believes with objectivism • Positivism approach • Concern with technique and application • Problem solving approaches

  10. The reconstruction • The demise of problem-solving theory • The emerge of pluralism • Structuration theory • Cultural approaches • Imperfect peace

  11. IR and CR according louis kreisberg • Converging : IR have contribute have contribute to some CR development. • Complementary ; Peacemaking practice of CR and IR often complement each other.

  12. Conclusion • Runtuhnya pandangan universal dan obyektifitas dalam resolusi konflik menyebabkan munculnya beberapa pendekatan khas HI • studi HI yang mulai menyadari kompleksitas aktor dalam era global mengembangkan beberapa macam pendekatan dengan lebih melihat aspek-aspek partikular penyebab konflik,

More Related