Brasil

1. Impact Evaluation Concept Note Brasil Morar CariocaSergio Guimarães (IPP), Isabel Tostes (SMH), Adriana Larangeira (SMH), Pedro Abramo (IPPUR), Vasco Acioli (SMU)Facilitators: Florence Kondylis, Arianna Legovini and Astrid Zwager (World Bank)

2. Map

3. Context • Large program of favelas (slum) upgrading and their integration into the urban tissue • Many interventions are planned • Infrastructure upgrading, roads, sewage and draining, water supply, garbage collection, etc • Impact evaluation will look into the following key identified areas: • IBASE: participatory diagnostic process • Service delivery and Operation & Maintenance • POUSO (Advanced Post for Urban and Social Orientation)

4. Context • Large program of favelas (slum) upgrading and their integration into the urban tissue • Many interventions are planned • Infrastructure upgrading, roads, sewage and draining, water supply, garbage collection, etc • Impact evaluation will look into the following key identified areas: • IBASE: participatory diagnostic process • Service delivery and Operation & Maintenance • POUSO (Advanced Post for Urban and Social Orientation)

5. POUSO (Advanced Post for Urban and Social Orientation) • Objectives • As the name says! • Facilitate urbanization process • Formalizing the informal • Keep formalization alive

6. POUSO (Advanced Post for Urban and Social Orientation) • Objectives • As the name says! • Facilitate urbanization process • Formalizing the informal • Keep formalization alive • Main Activities • Setting up Rules • Enforcement • Advising on application • Roads Recognition

7. Evaluation Questions • Rule Setting: • What’s the best participatory approach to optimize communities’ understanding and acceptance of the rules? • Test knowledge and perception of rules in the community

8. Evaluation Questions • Rule Setting: • What’s the best participatory approach to optimize communities’ understanding and acceptance of the rules? • Test knowledge and perception of rules in the community • Rule Enforcement / Compliance: • What are the most effective mechanisms to decrease the incidence of conflicts / non-compliance of building rules? • How to deal with externalities associated to densification? • Can a market solution be more effective than stringent regulation? • Indicators • Compliance rate • Extent of the informal housing market (medium and long term) • Property / rental value

9. Evaluation Questions • Rule Setting: • What’s the best participatory approach to optimize communities’ understanding and acceptance of the rules? • Test knowledge and perception of rules in the community • Rule Enforcement / Compliance: • What are the most effective mechanisms to decrease the incidence of conflicts / non-compliance of building rules? • How to deal with externalities associated to densification? • Can a market solution be more effective than stringent regulation? • Indicators • Compliance rate • Extent of the informal housing market (medium and long term) • Property / rental value • What is the impact of having an official address?

10. Intervention Summary • Proposal: • Experimenting different participatory processes to set up and/or disseminate the rules • Ex-post participatory information • Ex-ante facilitation • Implement alternative mechanisms for compliance • Marketplace for building rights • Performance-based incentives

11. Evaluation Design

12. Timeline • Start developing a fuller Concept Note on this evaluation and the other identified key areas in the next joint WB / Project mission • Expected roll out (gradual): • 2012 … TBD

13. Team and staffing • Research Team • WB / DIME • PREFEITURA DA CIDADE DO RIO DE JANEIRO • IPPUR • IAB • NGOs (many … IBASE is one) • Involved Agencies: • …

14. POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS INTEGRADAS

15. Obrigado!!!