1 / 49

CHAP. 12 : PRIVILEGES

CHAP. 12 : PRIVILEGES. P. JANICKE FALL 2012. DEFINITION. A PRIVILEGE IS A RIGHT OF SOME PERSON OR ENTITY TO BLOCK THE ADMISSION OF CERTAIN KINDS OF EVIDENCE IN A CASE EVEN THOUGH RELEVANT EVEN THOUGH CRUCIAL EVEN THOUGH NO PREJUDICE UNDER R403. PURPOSE. TO FURTHER SOME SOCIETAL GOAL

tave
Download Presentation

CHAP. 12 : PRIVILEGES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CHAP. 12 :PRIVILEGES P. JANICKE FALL 2012

  2. DEFINITION • A PRIVILEGE IS A RIGHT OF SOME PERSON OR ENTITY TO BLOCK THE ADMISSION OF CERTAIN KINDS OF EVIDENCE IN A CASE • EVEN THOUGH RELEVANT • EVEN THOUGH CRUCIAL • EVEN THOUGH NO PREJUDICE UNDER R403 Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  3. PURPOSE • TO FURTHER SOME SOCIETAL GOAL • REFLECTS HUMANKIND’S EFFORT TO CIVILIZE ITSELF Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  4. FEDERAL RULES ON PRIVILEGES • PRACTICALLY NONEXISTENT Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  5. TEXAS RULE ON ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE • RULE 503 Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  6. ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE • A PERSON WHO CONSULTS A LAWYER FOR THE PURPOSEOF OBTAINING LEGAL ADVICE HAS A PRIVILEGE TO BLOCK DISCLOSURE OF WHAT THE PERSON OR THE LAWYER SAID, IF THE CIRCUMSTANCES WERE APPARENTLY CONFIDENTIAL Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  7. HELL OR HIGH WATER • THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS BASED ON NEEDS OF THE OTHER SIDE • THEY CAN TRY TO DISCOVER THE FACTS SOME OTHER WAY • THE ONLY SIGNIFICANT EXCEPTION IS: A LATER ACTION BETWEEN THE LAWYER AND THE CLIENT • MALPRACTICE • ACTION TO COLLECT A FEE Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  8. SO-CALLED CRIME/FRAUD “EXCEPTION” • WHERE CLIENT’S MAIN PURPOSE IS TO INVOLVE THE LAWYER IN ASSISTING IN A CRIME OR FRAUD, THE DEFINITION ISN’T MET (PURPOSE ISN’T TO GET LEGAL ADVICE) • NOT REALLY AN EXCEPTION, BUT OFTEN CALLED ONE Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  9. WHERE LAWYER DECLINES THE REPRESENTATION • NO EFFECT ON THE PRIVILEGE • NO RELATIONSHIP NEEDED • SEE DEFINITION Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  10. EAVESDROPPER • NO EFFECT • SEE DEFINITION : APPARENT CONFIDENTIALITY IS ENOUGH • SOME OLDER CASES CONTRA • EAVESDROPPERS CAN BE ENJOINED Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  11. BOTH SIDES OF CONVERSATION COVERED • TRADITIONALLY, ONLY WHAT THE CLIENT SAID WAS PRIVILEGED • HOWEVER, WHAT THE LAWYER SAID USUALLY INHERENTLY REVEALS WHAT THE CLIENT SAID, AND IS CALLED DERIVATIVELY PRIVILEGED • E.G. : “HMMM! THEN YOU’RE GUILTY OF MURDER!” Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  12. MOST MODERN DECISIONS SHORTEN THE ANALYSIS AND SAY THE PRIVILEGE COVERS BOTH WAYS Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  13. THE CLIENT “OWNS” THE PRIVILEGE • CAN DECIDE WHETHER OR NOT TO BLOCK DISCLOSURE IN COURT • CAN DECIDE WHICH OF LAWYER’S HELPERS, IF ANY, SHOULD SEE IT Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  14. WAIVER • ONLY BY THE CLIENT OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE (WHO IS OFTEN THE LAWYER) • EXPRESSLY WAIVES • PERSONALLY AUTHORIZES DISCLOSURE OF THE COMMUNICATION • AUTHORIZES AGENT TO DISCLOSE THE COMMUNICATION • WAIVES BY CONDUCT • REVEALS THE COMMUNICATION TO OTHERS “OUTSIDE THE FAMILY” • HANDS OVER DOCUMENTS CONTAINING THE COMMUNICATION Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  15. WAIVER BY CONDUCT: HALF-OPEN DOOR RULE • REVEALING PARTS IN TESTIMONY • RELYING ON “ADVICE OF COUNSEL” TO DEFEAT CERTAIN REMEDIES • REVEALING ONE OPINION BUT ASSERTING PRIVILEGE ON OTHERS ON SAME TOPIC • NEW RULE 502 • CODIFIES THE HALF-OPEN RULE • OUGHT “IN FAIRNESS” TO BE CONSIDERED WITH WAIVED ITEM Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  16. LAWYER MUST HONOR THE CLIENT’S WAIVER INSTRUCTION • EVEN IF EMBARRASSING TO THE LAWYER • A RESULT OF CLIENT “OWNING” THE PRIVILEGE Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  17. IMPACT OF WAIVER MADE IN A FEDERAL CASE • MAY OPERATE AS A WAIVER ON OTHER PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS ON SAME TOPIC, UP TO THE DATE OF THE WAIVER • IF THE TWO COMMUNICATIONS OUGHT “IN FAIRNESS” TO BE CONSIDERED TOGETHER Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  18. IMPACT OF WAIVER: COMMON LAW AND STATE RULE • WAIVER AS TO ONE COMMUNICATION WAIVES AS TO ALL OTHER COMMUNICATIONS ON THE SAME TOPIC, UP TO THE DATE OF THE WAIVER • TO PREVENT PICK-AND-CHOOSE TACTIC Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  19. PROBLEMS/CASES • 12A • 12B • 12C • Meredith • 12D • Suburban • Osterhoudt (cont’d) Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  20. PROBLEMS/CASES • Zolin • 12E • Exercise #9 Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  21. MORE TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE

  22. TWO MARITAL PRIVILEGES[TEXAS RULE 504] • MARITAL COMMUNICATIONS • MADE DURING MARRIAGE UNDER APPARENT PRIVACY CONDITIONS • PRIVILEGE BELONGS TO THE SPEAKING SPOUSE • DOESN’T EXTEND TO CONTEMPORANEOUS ACTIONS • PRIVILEGE SURVIVES DIVORCE Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  23. EXCEPTIONS • ACTIONS BETWEEN THE SPOUSES • CRIMINAL CASE WHERE ALLEGED VICTIM WAS THE LISTENING SPOUSE, OR A MINOR CHILD • SEVERAL OTHER EXCEPTIONS SEE TEXAS EV. R. 504 Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  24. EXAMPLE • “LOOK HERE, HONEY, AT ALL THIS MONEY I ROBBED FROM THE BANK!” • IF EX-WIFE BECOMES A WITNESS: • SHE CAN BE COMPELLED TO TESTIFY TO SEEING MONEY DUMPED BY HUSBAND ON THE BED • HUSBAND CAN PREVENT EX-WIFE FROM TESTIFYING TO WHAT HE SAID Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  25. PRIVILEGE NOT TO BE CALLED BY THE PROSECUTION[TEX. RULE 504] • BELONGS TO THE WITNESS- SPOUSE, NOT THE ACCUSED SPOUSE • ENDS WITH DIVORCE • DOES NOT APPLY WHERE WITNESS-SPOUSE IS VICTIM Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  26. MANY OTHER STATES(AND MANY MOVIES) • PRIVILEGE BELONGS TO THE DEFENDANT SPOUSE Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  27. PRIVILEGE AGAINST COMPELLED SELF-INCRIMINATION • CAN’T BE REQUIRED TO TESTIFY • CAN’T BE OBLIGED TO WRITE OUT A CONFESSION • BUT: IF A PERSON WRITES A DOCUMENT ON HIS OWN INITIATIVE, THERE IS NO PRIVILEGE; THE DOCUMENT CAN BE SUBPOENAED, AND USED BY PROSECUTION Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  28. THE PROBLEM OF FILES • THEY ARE CREATED VOLUNTARILY, SO ARE NOT PROTECTED • GIVING THEM TO A LAWYER WON’T HELP • BUT SOMETIMES, PRODUCING THEM IN RESPONSE TO SUBPOENA COULD HAVE EFFECT OF MAKING A FORCED STATEMENT -- >> Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  29. EXAMPLE • SUBPOENA REQUESTING “ALL BANK DEPOSIT SLIPS THAT REFLECT DEPOSITS OF MONEY MADE FROM DRUG SALES” • THIS SHOULD BE QUASHED, SINCE THE COMMAND IS PHRASED SUCH THAT COMPLIANCE WOULD AMOUNT TO A COMPELLED STATEMENT Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  30. EXAMPLE 2 • SUBPOENA COMMANDING PRODUCTION OF “THE WEAPON YOU USED IN THE MAY 15 MURDER” • ACT OF COMPLIANCE IS EQUIVALENT TO CONFESSION • SHOULD BE QUASHED Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  31. CIVIL CASES: JUDICIAL COMMENT ON INVOKING THE 5TH • PLAINTIFF INVOKING: • IS APT TO BE NON-SUITED IN TEXAS • CIVIL DEFENDANT INVOKING: • WILL HAVE HEAVY NEGATIVE JUDICIAL COMMENT FOR INVOKING 5TH IN TEXAS • ALL OTHER PRIVILEGES ARE UNMENTIONABLE Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  32. CLERGYMAN-PENITENT[TEXAS RULE 505] • WORKS SIMILARLY TO LAWYER-CLIENT PRIVILEGE • CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES • MAIN ISSUE TODAY IS: WHAT ORGANIZATIONS ARE RELIGIONS? Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  33. TRADE SECRETTEXAS RULE 507 • A QUASI-PRIVILEGE • COURT CAN OVERRIDE IT IF MAINTAINING THE PRIVILEGE WOULD “WORK INJUSTICE” • PRETTY EASY TO BREAK TODAY, WITH PROTECTIVE ORDER Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  34. PHYSICIAN-PATIENT PRIVILEGE [TEXAS RULE 509] • NO SUCH PRIVILEGE IN CRIMINAL CASES IN TEXAS Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  35. PHYSICIAN-PATIENT PRIVILEGE [TEXAS RULE 509] • ALMOST NONEXISTENT EVEN IN CIVIL CASES, DUE TO EXCEPTION (e)(4): • NO PRIVILEGE WHERE THE PATIENT’S CONDITION IS PART OF A PARTY’S CLAIM OR DEFENSE • [WHEN WOULD IT NOT BE, AND RETAIN RELEVANCE ??] Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  36. MENTAL HEALTH PROFESSIONALS[TEXAS RULE 510] • NO PRIVILEGE IN CRIMINAL CASES • IN CIVIL CASES: • TRACKS THE DOCTOR-PATIENT RULE • INCLUDES DRUG-ABUSE WORKERS • SAME GLARING EXCEPTION Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  37. PARTY’S WORK PRODUCT[FED. R. CIV. P. 26 (b)(3)] • IS NOT A PRIVILEGE, BUT SOMEWHAT LIKE ONE • PARTY’S MATERIALS PREPARED IN ANTICIPATION OF LITIGATION, OR FOR TRIAL, ARE COVERED • LAWYER STUFF IS A BIG PART OF IT • CAN BE (AND OFTEN IS) OVERRIDDEN BY A SHOWING OF NEED Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  38. BUT, MENTAL IMPRESSIONS OF COUNSEL ARE MASKED OUT Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  39. TEX. R. CIV. P. 192 • IS SIMILAR TO FED. PRACTICE: • COUNSEL IMPRESSIONS ARE CALLED “CORE” WORK PRODUCT, GENERALLY BLOCKED • THE REST IS CALLED “OTHER WORK PRODUCT” AND CAN BE HAD BY SHOWING “SUBSTANTIAL NEED” • MEMO TO FILE IS WORK PRODUCT, NOT PRIVILEGED; BUT LIKELY IS “CORE” Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  40. WORK PRODUCT HAS NO APPLICABILITY IN CRIMINAL CASES • E.G., GRAND JURY SUBPOENA OVERRIDES Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  41. PROBLEMS/CASES • 12H • Griffin • 12I • Doe • Exercise #10 Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  42. JOURNALIST’S PRIVILEGE • FEDERAL CASE LAW CREATES A QUASI-PRIVILEGE: MUST EXHAUST OTHER POSSIBLE AVENUES OF EVIDENCE FIRST • TEXAS HAS A STATUTE CREATING THIS PRIVILEGE: Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  43. JOURNALIST’S PRIVILEGE IN CIVIL CASESTex. Civ. Prac. & Rems. Code §22.021 • COVERS PERSONS WHO DO NEWS GATHERING OR DISSEMINATION • FOR A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF THEIR LIVELIHOOD OR • FOR SUBSTANTIAL FINANCIAL GAIN • COVERS THEIR EMPLOYER COMPANIES • ALSO COVERS UNIVERSITY SCHOLARS AND RESEARCHERS Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  44. THE PRIVILEGE: • TO REFUSE TO DISCLOSE ANY INFORMATION COLLECTED IN THAT CAPACITY, WHETHER OR NOT CONFIDENTIAL • TO REFUSE TO DISCLOSE SOURCES • PUBLICATION OF THE INFORMATION BY A NEWS MEDIUM IS NOT A WAIVER Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  45. LIMITS: • COURT CAN ORDER DISCLOSURE BY JOURNALIST IF: • NO OTHER WAY TO OBTAIN THE EVIDENCE • SUBPOENA IS NARROWLY DRAFTED • INTEREST OF JUSTICE OUTWEIGHS PUBLIC INTEREST IN NEWS FLOW • THE NEWS ARTICLE, BROADCAST, ETC., ITSELF IS NOT PRIVILEGED (WILL BE ADMISSIBLE IF COMPLIANT WITH THE OTHER RULES OF EVIDENCE, ESPECIALLY HEARSAY) Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  46. JOURNALIST’S PRIVILEGE IN TEXAS CRIMINAL CASESTEX. CODE. CRIM. PROC. ART. 38.11 • SIMILAR TO THE CIVIL PRIVILEGE, EXCEPT: • NO SOURCE PRIVILEGE IF A FELONY IS COMMITTED IN JOURNALIST’S PRESENCE, AND NO OTHER WAY TO PROVE IT • NO SOURCE PRIVILEGE IF SOURCE ADMITTED COMMISSION OF A FELONY, AND NO OTHER WAY TO PROVE IT • NO SOURCE PRIVILEGE IF PROBABLE CAUSE EXISTS THAT SOURCE COMMITTED A FELONY, AND NO OTHER WAY TO PROVE IT Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  47. NO SOURCE PRIVILEGE IF INFO IS OBTAINED BY BREACH OF GRAND JUROR’S DUTY OF SECRECY • NO SOURCE PRIVILEGE IF DISCLOSURE OF SOURCE IS NEEDED TO PROTECT LIFE OR PREVENT SERIOUS BODILY HARM Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  48. INFORMATION (OTHER THAN SOURCE) PRIVILEGE: • TRACKS THE CIVIL RULE • JUDGE CAN ORDER DISCLOSURE IF NECESSARY AND NARROWLY TAILORED • INTER ALIA, MUST HAVE INDEPENDENT EVIDENCE THAT A CRIME HAS OCCURRED Chap. 12 -- Privileges

  49. ABROGATION OF PRIVILEGES IN CHILD-ABUSE CASESTEX. FAM. CODE §261.202 • ALL PRIVILEGES VANISH IN PROCEEDINGS “REGARDING THE ABUSE OR NEGLECT OF A CHILD” • EXCEPT: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE • MAIN PURPOSE: TO BLOCK MARITAL COMMUNICATION PRIVILEGE Chap. 12 -- Privileges

More Related