250 likes | 401 Views
MHSOAC. i n n o v a t i o n. MHSA Section 5830 (a). Increase Access to Underserved Groups Increase Quality of Services Promote Interagency Cooperation Increase Access to Services. MHSA Section 5830 (b). MHSA Section 5892 (a) (6). 5% of County PEI & CSS Funds Innovation Program.
E N D
MHSOAC innovation
MHSA Section 5830 (a) • Increase Access to Underserved Groups • Increase Quality of Services • Promote Interagency Cooperation • Increase Access to Services
MHSA Section 5892 (a) (6) 5% of County PEI & CSS Funds Innovation Program
MHSOAC Innovation Committee Committee Charge: Create a Broad and Flexible Foundation for the Funding of Innovative Mental Health Programs that is consistent with the Transformative Values of the MHSA.
MHSOAC Innovation Committee • Formed October 2006 • Monthly Meetings Noticed on MHSOAC Webpage • Draft Innovation Program Recommendations Completed May 23, 2007 • First-Read of Draft Recommendations by MHSOAC on July 26, 2007
MHSOAC Innovation Committee Karen Henry, Chair • MHSOAC Commissioner • NAMI California Board of Directors Andrew Poat, Vice-Chair • MHSOAC Commissioner • Director, San Diego Dept. of Gov. Relations • San Diego Gay & Lesbian Center
MHSOAC Innovation Committee • CA Network of Mental Health Clients • CA Primary Care Association • Co. Mental Health Directors Assoc. • LA City Police Dept. • NAMI • Providers • Sacramento Co. Mental Health Dept. • UC, Davis Medical School See Roster for Complete List
Innovation Resource PaperDefinition • Novel & Creative • Developed With Under-Served Communities • Promotes Recovery & Resilience • Reduces Disparities in Services & Outcomes • May Not Always Be Successful • Leads to Learning
Innovation Resource Paper:Funding Priorities County Programs Focus on One or More Funding Priorities:
Innovation Resource PaperScope of Programs • New Mental Health Approaches • Adaptation of an Existing Mental Health Approach • Adaptation of Community Approaches in Mental Health Contexts
Innovation Resource PaperScope -- Target Populations Individuals Families Caregivers All Ages Multi-generational
Innovation Resource PaperScope -- Venues Neighborhoods Tribal Organizations Communities Counties Multi-County
Innovation Resource PaperScope -- Interventions • Advocacy • Outreach • Planning • Policy and System Change • Public Education • Training • Other
Innovation Resource PaperPrinciple #1 Programs Must be Aligned with the Transformational Values of the MHSA and Vision Statement and Guiding Principles for DMH Implementation of the MHSA. • Un-served, Underserved, Inappropriately Served. • Transforms Mental Health System • Reduces Stigma and Discrimination
Innovation Resource PaperPrinciple #2 Programs Must be Developed at the Grassroots Level • Documentation of a Fair, inclusive Outreach and Input Process • Ongoing Involvement of service users in Implementation, Evaluation, Staffing, and Dissemination
Innovation Resource PaperPrinciple #3 Programs Must Promote Recovery and/or Resiliency • Based on a Compelling Theory, Research, Cultural Tradition, Etc. • Explains Why an Approach is Contextually Appropriate
Innovation Resource PaperPrinciple #4 Programs Should Demonstrate Cultural Competency & Capacity to Reduce Disparities.
Innovation Resource PaperPrinciple #5 Initiate & Support Linkages With Organizations & Practitioners Outside of the Mental Health Field.
Innovation Resource PaperPrinciple #6 Includes A Plan for Relevant Evaluation that Reflects the Perspective of Diverse Users. • Describe Current Baseline • Identifies Outcome • Reflects Community Values • Contributes to Learning.
Innovation Resource PaperPrinciple #6 Includes a Plan to Share & Build Upon Success & Lessons Learned • Dissemination Plan Should Not Contribute to Stigma and Discrimination • Should Document participation in regional and statewide policy forums.
Innovation Resource PaperPrinciple #7 Leveraging to Maximize Impact
Innovation Resource PaperPrinciple #8 Time-Limited • Includes a Specific Time Frame to Demonstrate the Feasibility of an Innovation • Includes a Plan to Transition to Sustainable Funding
Innovation Resource PaperOther Key Recommendations • Efficient, User-Friendly Approval Process • Maximum of 5-8% for Program Evaluation (paid with admin funds) • All State and Federal Research and Service Guidelines Apply • Focus on Historically Underserved Groups