220 likes | 362 Views
The galaxy evolution context. The “overcooling” problem: T oo much condensation to be consistent with observed galaxy masses. Toft et al. (2002); Muller & Bullock (2004). Hot Gaseous Halos around the Milky Way and Nearby Disk Galaxies. Q. Daniel Wang University of Massachusetts.
E N D
The galaxy evolution context • The “overcooling” problem: • Too much condensation to be consistent with observed galaxy masses Toft et al. (2002); Muller & Bullock (2004)
Hot Gaseous Halos aroundthe Milky Way and Nearby Disk Galaxies Q. Daniel Wang University of Massachusetts In collaboration with Y.-Y. Yao (MIT), Z.-Y. Li, S.-K. Tang (Umass), etc.
ROSAT ¾-keV Diffuse Background Map X-ray binary ~50% of the background is thermal and local (z < 0.01) The rest is mostly from faint AGNs (McCammon et al. 2002)
Absorption Sight Lines X-ray binary AGN ROSAT all-sky survey in the ¾-keV band X-ray binary
Fe XVII K LMXB X1820-303 • In GC NGC 6624 • l, b = 2o.8, -8o • Distance = 7.6kpc tracing the global ISM • 1 kpc away from the Galactic plane NHI • Two radio pulsars in the GC: DM Ne • Chandra observations: • 15 ks LETG (Futamoto et al. 2004) • 21 ks HETG LETG+HETG spectrum Yao & Wang 2006, Yao et al. 2006
X1820-303: Results • Hot gas accounts for ~ 6% of the total O column density • Mean temperature T = 106.34 K • O abundance: • 0.3 (0.2-0.6) solar in neutral atomic gas • 2.0 (0.8-3.6) solar in ionized gas • Hot Ne/O =1.4(0.9-2.1) solar (90% confidence) • Hot Fe/Ne = 0.9(0.4-2.0) solar • Velocity dispersion 255 (165–369) km/s
Mrk 421 (Yao & Wang 2006) • Joint-fit with the absorption lines with the OVII and OVIII line emission (McCammon et al. 2002) • Model: n=n0e-z/hn; T=T0e-z/hT • n=n0(T/T0), =hT/hn, L=hn/sin b OVI 1032 A
Global hot gas properties • Non-isothermal: • mean T ~ 106.3 K toward the inner region • ~ 106.1 K at solar neighborhood • Velocity dispersion from ~200 km/s to 80 km/s • Consistent with solar abundance ratios • A thick Galactic disk with a scale height 1-2 kpc, ~ the values of OVI absorbers and free electrons • No evidence for a large-scale (r ~ 102 kpc) X-ray-emitting/absorbing halo with an upper limit of NH~1 x1019 cm-2
IRAC 8 micro K-band 0.5-2 keV M31 Li & Wang 2007 0.5-1 keV 1-2 keV 2-8 keV Lx~2x1038 erg/s Zh=0.6 kpc, but with flat tails at large z
NW SE NGC 2841 (Sb) • D=15 Mpc • Vc = 317 km/s • Lx ~ 7 x 1039 ergs/s Red: optical Blue: 0.3-1.5 keV diffuse emission Wang et al 2007
NGC 5746 • D=29.5 Mpc • Vc = 307 km/s • Claimed to have a diffuse X-ray halo with r ~ 20 kpc and Lx ~ 4 x 1039 ergs/s (Pederson et al. 2006) • But, …
Extraplanar hot gas seen in nearby galaxies • At least two components of diffuse hot gas: • Disk – driven by massive star formation • Bulge – heated primarily by Type-Ia SNe • Characteristic extent and temperature similar to the Galactic values • No evidence for large-scale X-ray-emitting galactic halos
Observations vs. simulations • Little evidence for X-ray emission or absorption from IGM accretion. No “overcooling” problem? • Missing stellar energy feedback, at least in early-type spirals. Where does the energy go? Galaxy Vc NGC 4565 250 NGC 2613 304 NGC 5746 307 NGC 2841 317 NGC 4594 370 Simulations by Toft et al. (2003)
z=1.2 z=1.2 z=1.2 1-D galaxy formation model • Accretion of both dark and baryon matters • Initial bulge formation (5x1010 Msun) as a starburst shock-heating and expanding of gas • Continuous Type Ia SNe bulge wind Tang & Wang 2007
Total baryon before the SB Cosmological baryon fraction Total baryon at present Hot gas Evolution of Baryons around galaxies • Galaxies such as the MW evolves in a hot bubble with a deficit of baryon matter • This bubble explains the lack of large-scale X-ray halos. • Bulge wind removes the present stellar feedback. • Results are sensitive to the initial burst and to the bulge/halo mass ratio
Galactic bulge simulation • Energy not dissipated locally • Most of the energy is in the bulk motion and in waves • Parallel, adaptive mesh refinement FLASH code • Finest refinement in one octant down to 6 pc • Stellar mass injection and SNe, following stellar light • SN rate ~ 4x10-4 /yr • Mass injection rate ~0.1 Msun/yr) 10x10x10 kpc3 box density distribution
The fate of the energy • Maybe eventually damped by cooling gas in the galactic hot halo. • Galactic wind not necessary, depending the galaxy mass and IGM environment. • Interaction with the infalling IGM a solution to the over-cooling problem. kpc
Conclusions • Diffuse X-ray-emitting gas is strongly concentrated toward galactic disks and bulges. No X-ray evidence for large-scale halos on scales > ~ 20 kpc. • Heating is mostly due to SNe. But the bulk of their energy is not detected and is probably propagated into the halo. • Feedback from a galactic bulge likely plays a key role in galaxy evolution: • Initial burst heating and expansion of gas beyond the virial radius • Ongoing Type Ia SNe keeping the gas from forming a cooling flow
NGC 5775 Diffuse X-ray emission compared with HST/ACS images Red – H Green – Optical R-band Blue – 0.3-1.5 keV