240 likes | 370 Views
The Future of the Legal Profession – a 2011 perspective Sussex JLD. Martin Richardson Professional Development Consultant, Law South. Solicitors – some historical facts (1). Sole practitioners and partnerships The Law Society – 1825 – the professions governing body
E N D
The Future of the Legal Profession – a 2011 perspectiveSussex JLD Martin Richardson Professional Development Consultant, Law South
Solicitors – some historical facts (1) • Sole practitioners and partnerships • The Law Society – 1825 – the professions governing body • The Partnership Act 1890 – regulated the partnership as a business entity • The Companies Act 1948 – limited the number of partners in a partnership to 20
Solicitors – some historical facts (2) • The Companies Act 1967 – removed the restriction on the number of partners • The Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 – created the limited liability partnership (LLP) as a quasi corporate entity. Partners become Members. • The Legal Services Act 2007
The LSA 2007 • Enacted following the Clementi Report of 2004 • Clementi set up with a view to recommending:- the opening up of the legal services market to provide greater competition- the abolition of the solicitors closed shop regarding the provision of legal services
Some key provisions of the LSA • The setting up of the Solicitors Regulations Authority (SRA) and the Office for Legal Complaints (OLC) • The creation of Legal Disciplinary Practices (LDPs) and Alternative Business Structures (ABSs) as new business entities for the provision of legal services
The tripartite management of the profession • The Law Society – the solicitors representative body cf: BMA • The SRA – deals with qualification, CPD and professional conduct matters cf: GMC • The OLC – is the final arbiter on client complaints and consequential issues
The new business entities • The LDP – permits up to 25% of the partnership capital to be owned by non-solicitors e.g. legal executives, senior managers, other professionals • The ABS – any non-traditional partnership / LLP providing either core or ancillary legal services
Examples of ABSs • The LDP • Existing partnerships wishing to float and attract external capital, e.g. Irwin Mitchell • Existing corporates wishing to add legal services to their existing product portfolio, e.g. The Co-op
Facilitating the ABS • Replacement of the Professional Code of Conduct 2006 by the 2011 version • OFR rather than prescriptive rules • Based on the 10 mandatory principles of practice • Authorised bodies, COLPs and COFAs • Client focused • Flexibility encourages entrepreneurs and external capital
Implementation • All now implemented except the SRA licensing certificate for authorisation under the new regime • 6 October now deferred ?by weeks only • So ABS applications delayed
The effect of the LSA • Existing firms • Work specialisms • Commoditisation • Leverage and profitability • Pricing • Fee-earning staff composition • Support staff composition
Existing firms • Magic circle – no change • Top 75 (50+ partners) – minor but focused adjustments to strategy and practice • Niche practices – no change provided top quality and excellence • Traditional High Street practices:- merge- be bought out (? by a corporate)- die • Medium sized full service firms – merger mania
Work specialisms • Death of the smaller full service firm • Excellence in chosen fields of practice • Build networks to support clients in other areas of work • Ongoing strategic thinking to keep ahead of the game when new areas of practice start to develop • The clients lead
Commoditisation • Template practice • Extensive and comprehensive use of IT • Resi conveyancing, PI, wills and increasingly parts of more sophisticated areas of practice • Potentially highly profitable • This is what will interest the external capital
Leverage and profitability • The right staff at the right level doing the right work • Delegation to the lowest level of competence • Team and project management / leadership become critical • Applies to rocket science, widgets and everything in between
Commoditised worke.g. resi conveyancing Ps SFEs JFEs
Standard worke.g. basic corporate Ps SFEs JFEs
Rocket Sciencee.g. complex tax Ps SFEs JFEs
Pricing • To reflect the type of work (see previous models) – commoditised cheap; rocket science expensive • Time recording indicative not definitive • Fixed fees, contingency fees and value added – or a mix • Efficiency as well as effectiveness – will be a capital as well as client demand
Fee-earning staff composition FEWER SOLICITORS MORE PARALEGALS
Support staff composition • Firm run as a business • More professional executives • Greater respect as a result • Partners/members/shareholders not running the firm day to day • Less junior staff; more fee-earner involvement in administration
To sum up... • All change for some firms • Increased competition • Therefore must be increased efficiency • Maximising use of IT • Costs down; prices realistically competitive • Business and commercial focus
Other SRA initiatives • Work Based Learning (WBL) – a scheme currently being piloted and designed to take the place of the training contract thus enabling people from various backgrounds to qualify as a solicitor • CPD – a review of the current system is in the pipeline
The Bar • Increasing number of barristers working in firms • Gradual demise of generalist chambers? • Specialist Bar surviving, but... • Merger of the professions in ?20 years • Only prevented by tradition