330 likes | 430 Views
FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION: THE LITHUANIAN WAY. CONTENTS. Factors Decision Challenges Dilemmas Priorities. FACTORS. FACTORS. External globalisation fall of the Berlin Wall diffusion: East – West Internal freedom procedures mentality integration into the EU, NATO.
E N D
CONTENTS • Factors • Decision • Challenges • Dilemmas • Priorities
FACTORS • External • globalisation • fall of the Berlin Wall • diffusion: East – West • Internal • freedom • procedures • mentality • integration into the EU, NATO
CONCLUSIONS • Corruption becomes a global concern • “Young” democracies: favourable conditions for corruption • “Old” democracies: unprepared for a new challenge • Compatibility of the young and the old: a generation gap • Untraditional thinking • Pro-active systems, quickly responding to changes and changing the environment for their own benefit
ANTI-CORRUPTION SYSTEM C O R R U P T I O N CRIMINAL PROSECUTION PREVENTION EDUCATION STT GOVERNMENT PRESIDENT PARLIAMENT GENERAL PUBLIC
Special Investigation Service (STT) • Independent body • Independent investigations • Three equally important pillars: • criminal prosecution • prevention • education • Co-ordinating body
CO-ORDINATION Sectors STT PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
CHALLENGES • Political will • Strategy • Legal framework • Structure • Personnel • Resources • Public support • Unrealistic goals and expectations
DILEMMAS • Perception or reality? • Public or shadow administration? • Bad or good? • Tactical stability or strategic instability?
Perception or reality? Action Perception Actual level of corruption The level of corruption posing no danger to the state Time Suspension
Public or Shadow Administration? • Bribes: • help solve problems • I gave them and will continue to give • great effectiveness • future generation • Effective system of shadow administration: • uses public resources • unbound by legislation • rapid • service-orientated (helping a person) • Competition: the most effective wins
Good or Evil? • mentality of transitional period • statistical citizen • distorted system of values • alienation of the state and citizen
Tactical Stability or Strategic Instability? REALITY + “CATALYSTS” = PERCEPTION • REALITY: • HUGE CORRUPTION • INEFFECTIVE ADMINISTRATION • “CATALISTS”: • MENTALITY • MASS MEDIA • OUTCOME: • BAD STATE = CORRUPT STATE • DISTRUST OF THE MAIN STATE INSTITUTIONS • HIGH CORRUPTION PERCEPTION INDEX
Tactical Stability or Strategic Instability? • CONSEQUENCES: • ACTION INFLUENCES BY PERCEPTION • SYSTEM IS UNSTABLE • SMALL FINANCIAL OR CONCEPTUAL INJECTION INTO ELECTIONS MAY FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE DEPLOYMENT OF POLITICAL FORCES • INCREASING THE RISK OF STATE CAPTURE
PRIORITIES • Political corruption • Administrative corruption • Increasing liability • Education • Courts • EU Anti-Corruption Network
POLITICAL CORRUPTION • Political party funding: ideas or money? • Legally-based influence: lobbying or influence? • Codes of conduct for politicians: conduct or ethics?
ADMINISTRATIVE CORRUPTION • Transparent and effective procedures: • collision: citizen vs state • inventory of procedures • audit • Anti-corruption review of legislation • One-stop-shop principle: • minimum information • minimum time period • minimum price • clear and strict consequences
INCREASING LIABILITY • Criminal liability • Civil liability • Administrative liability • Codes of conduct • Moral values
CRIMINAL LIABILITY • Necessary but insufficient tool • Specific corruption investigation tools: • effective intelligence • whistleblower/informant • criminal conduct simulation model • technical means • databases
CIVIL LIABILITY • Assets recovery system: • criminal liability:confiscation • civil liability:recovery • tax liability:taxes • Living within one’s means • Target: property or a person? • Burden of Proof: citizen or a state?
EDUCATION • Corruption is a threat • Civic society
COURTS • A problem of transitional period • Damaged courts: toothless law enforcement • Courts or investigators?
EU EFFORTS • Two processes: two networks • anti-corruption • assets recovery • Effective tools: • to curb global corruption • to strengthen national bodies • to reduce dependency on local authorities