1 / 16

Documentation of surface observation. Classification for siting and performance characteristics

Documentation of surface observation. Classification for siting and performance characteristics. Michel Leroy, Météo-France. Quality factors of a measurement. The intrinsic characteristics of sensors or measurement methods

tayte
Download Presentation

Documentation of surface observation. Classification for siting and performance characteristics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Documentation of surface observation. Classification for siting and performance characteristics Michel Leroy, Météo-France

  2. Quality factors of a measurement • The intrinsic characteristics of sensors or measurement methods • The maintenance and calibration needed to maintain the system in nominal conditions. • The site representativeness

  3. Site representativeness • Exposure rules from CIMO recommendations. • But not always followed and not always possible to follow, depending on the geographical situation. • In 1997, Météo-France defined a site classification for some basic surface variables. • Class 1 is for a site following WMO recommendations • Class 5 is for a site which should be absolutely avoided for large scale or meso-scale applications. • Class 2, 3 and 4 are intermediate • This classification has been presented during TECO98 in Casablanca.

  4. Classification of stations • Between 2000 and 2006, 400 AWS have been installed for the Radome network. • The objective was class 1 for each parameter (Temp, RH, wind, precip., solar radiation). • But class 2 or class 3 were accepted when class 1 not possible. • Météo-France is now classifying al the surface observing stations, including the climatological cooperative network: ~4300 sites, before the end of 2008. • Update at least every 5 years.

  5. Other quality factors • Intrinsic performances • Maintenance and calibration • Within a homogeneous network, these factors are known and generally the same. But Météo-France is using data from various networks: • Radome (554) • Non-proprietary AWS (~800) • Climatological cooperative network (> 3000) • The intrinsic performances, maintenance and calibration procedures are not the same.

  6. Several reasons • The objectives may be different. • But some uncertainty objectives are sometimes (often) unknown ! • To get cheap measurements ? • The maintenance and/or the calibration are not always organized ! • Within the ISO 9001-2000 certification process, Météo-France was forced to increase his knowledge of the various networks’ characteristics.

  7. Another classification ! • After site classification (1 to 5), definition of an additional classification, to cover the two quality factors : • Intrinsic performances • Maintenance and calibration • 4 levels were defined : • Class A : WMO/CIMO recommendations (Annex 1B of CIMO guide) • Class B : Lower specs, but more realistic or affordable : “good” performances and “good” maintenance and calibration. RADOME specs. • Class C: Lower performances and maintenance, but maintenance/calibration organized. • Class D : Unknown performances and/or no maintenance/calibration organized. • This classification is called : Maintained performance classification

  8. Air temperature • Class A: Overall uncertainty of 0.1°C. Therefore, the uncertainty of the temperature probe lower than 0.1°C and use of a “perfect” artificially ventilated screen. Achievable measurement uncertainty is 0.2°C. • Class B: Pt100 (or Pt1000) temperature probe of class A ( 0.25°C). Acquisition uncertainty < 0.15°C. Radiation screen with known characteristics and over-estimation of Tx (daily max. temperature) < 0.15°C in 95% of cases. Laboratory calibration of the temperature probe every 5 years. • Class C: Temperature probe with uncertainty < 0.4°C. Acquisition uncertainty < 0.3°C. Radiation screen with known characteristics and over-estimation of Tx < 0.3°C in 95% of cases. • Class D: Temperature probe and/or acquisition system uncertainty lower than for class C or unknown. Unknown radiation screen or with “unacceptable” characteristics (for example, over-estimation of Tx > 0.7°C in 5% of cases).

  9. Relative humidity • Class A: Overall uncertainty of 1%! Achievable 2%. • Class B: Sensor specified for  6%, over a temperature range of –20°C to +40°C. Acquisition uncertainty < 1%. Calibration every year, in an accredited laboratory. • Class C: Sensor specified for  10%, over a temperature range of –20°C to +40°C. Acquisition uncertainty < 1%. Calibration every two years in an accredited laboratory, or calibration every year in a non-accredited laboratory. • Class D: Sensor with unknown performances or specifications worst than  10% over the common temperature conditions. Unknown calibration or calibration not organized.

  10. Global solar radiation • Class A: Pyranometer of ISO class 1. Uncertainty of 5% for daily total. Ventilated sensor. Calibration every two years. Regular cleaning of the sensor (at least weekly). • Class B: Pyranometer of ISO class 1. No ventilation. Calibration every two years. No regular cleaning of the sensor. • Class C: Pyranometer of ISO class 2. No ventilation. Calibration every five years. No regular cleaning of the sensor. • Class D: Sensor with unknown performances or sensor not using a thermopile. Unknown calibration or calibration not organized.

  11. Other parameters • Pressure • Amount of precipitation • Wind • Visibility • Temperature above ground • Soil temperature

  12. Status of the RADOME network • Air temperature : Class B • RH : Class B • Amount of precipitation : Class B or Class C, depending on the rain gauge used. • Wind : Class A • Global solar radiation : Class A for manned station, class B for isolated sites. • Ground temperatures : Class B • Pressure : Class B • Visibility (automatic) : Class B

  13. Status of the cooperative network • Air temperature (liquid in glass thermometers) : Class C • Amount of precipitation : Class B

  14. Status of non-Météo-France additional networks • Air temperature : Class B to D • RH : Class B to D • Amount of precipitation : Class B to C • Wind : Class B to D • Global solar radiation : Class B to D • Ground temperature : Class B to C • Pressure : Class B to D

  15. Metadata • These classification for each site are meta data, part of the climatological database. • Site classification is on going. • Maintained performance classification has been defined this year and is in a test phase : is it possible to “easily” classify the additional networks. • With these two classifications, a measurement on a site can be given a short description. • Example : C3 for global solar radiation is for a class 2 pyranometer without ventilation, calibrated every 2 years, installed on a site with direct obstructions, but below 7°.

  16. Conclusion • These classifications are intended to describe the real world of measuring networks, which is sometimes far form the WMO/CIMO recommendations. • The possible interest of such classifications within CIMO could be considered.

More Related