590 likes | 606 Views
Explore singularly perturbed nonlinear eigenvalue problems in quantum physics and chemistry. Discuss existence, uniqueness, and nonexistence, asymptotic approximations, numerical methods, and extensions to systems. Motivation includes NLS equation, stationary states, ground and excited states, chemical potential, soliton, vortex states, and more.
E N D
Analysis and Efficient Computation for Nonlinear Eigenvalue Problems in Quantum Physics and Chemistry Weizhu Bao Department of Mathematics & Center of Computational Science and Engineering National University of Singapore Email: bao@math.nus.edu.sg URL: http://www.math.nus.edu.sg/~bao Collaborators: Fong Ying Lim (IHPC, Singapore), Yanzhi Zhang (FSU) Ming-Huang Chai (NUSHS); Yongyong Cai (NUS)
Outline • Motivation • Singularly perturbed nonlineareigenvalue problems • Existence, uniqueness & nonexistence • Asymptotic approximations • Numerical methods & results • Extension to systems • Conclusions
Motivation: NLS • The nonlinear Schrodinger (NLS) equation • t : time & : spatial coordinate (d=1,2,3) • : complex-valued wave function • : real-valued external potential • : interaction constant • =0: linear; >0: repulsive interaction • <0: attractive interaction
Motivation • In quantum physics & nonlinear optics: • Interaction between particles with quantum effect • Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC): bosons at low temperature • Superfluids: liquid Helium, • Propagation of laser beams, ……. • In plasma physics; quantum chemistry; particle physics; biology; materials science (DFT, KS theory,…); …. • Conservation laws
Motivation • Stationary states (ground & excited states) • Nonlinear eigenvalue problems: Find • Time-independent NLS or Gross-Pitaevskii equation (GPE): • Eigenfunctions are • Orthogonal in linear case & Superposition is valid for dynamics!! • Not orthogonal in nonlinear case !!!! No superposition for dynamics!!!
Motivation • The eigenvalue is also called as chemical potential • With energy • Special solutions • Soliton in 1D with attractive interaction • Vortex states in 2D
Motivation • Ground state: Non-convex minimization problem • Euler-Lagrange equation Nonlinear eigenvalue problem • Theorem(Lieb, etc, PRA, 02’) • Existence d-dimensions (d=1,2,3): • Positive minimizer is unique in d-dimensions (d=1,2,3)!! • No minimizer in 3D (and 2D) when • Existence in 1D for both repulsive & attractive • Nonuniquness in attractive interaction – quantum phase transition!!!!
Symmetry breaking in ground state • Attractive interaction with double-well potential
Motivation • Excited states: • Open question: (Bao & W. Tang, JCP, 03’; Bao, F. Lim & Y. Zhang, Bull Int. Math, 06’) • Continuous normalized gradient flow: • Mass conservation & energy diminishing
Singularly Perturbed NEP • For bounded with box potential for • Singularly perturbed NEP • Eigenvalue or chemical potential • Leading asymptotics of the previous NEP
Singularly Perturbed NEP • For whole space with harmonic potential for • Singularly perturbed NEP • Eigenvalue or chemical potential • Leading asymptotics of the previous NEP
General Form of NEP • Eigenvalue or chemical potential • Energy • Three typical parameter regimes: • Linear: • Weakly interaction: • Strongly repulsive interaction:
Box Potential in 1D • The potential: • The nonlinear eigenvalue problem • Case I: no interaction, i.e. • A complete set of orthonormal eigenfunctions
Box Potential in 1D • Ground state & its energy: • j-th-excited state & its energy • Case II: weakly interacting regime, i.e. • Ground state & its energy: • j-th-excited state & its energy
Box Potential in 1D • Case III: Strongly interacting regime, i.e. • Thomas-Fermi approximation, i.e. drop the diffusion term • Boundary condition is NOT satisfied, i.e. • Boundary layer near the boundary
Box Potential in 1D • Matched asymptotic approximation • Consider near x=0, rescale • We get • The inner solution • Matched asymptotic approximation for ground state
Box Potential in 1D • Approximate energy • Asymptotic ratios: • Width of the boundary layer:
Box Potential in 1D • Matched asymptotic approximation for excited states • Approximate chemical potential & energy • Boundary layers • Interior layers
Harmonic Oscillator Potential in 1D • The potential: • The nonlinear eigenvalue problem • Case I: no interaction, i.e. • A complete set of orthonormal eigenfunctions
Harmonic Oscillator Potential in 1D • Ground state & its energy: • j-th-excited state & its energy • Case II: weakly interacting regime, i.e. • Ground state & its energy: • j-th-excited state & its energy
Harmonic Oscillator Potential in 1D • Case III: Strongly interacting regime, i.e. • Thomas-Fermi approximation, i.e. drop the diffusion term • No boundary and interior layer • It is NOT differentiable at
Harmonic Oscillator Potential in 1D • Thomas-Fermi approximation for first excited state • Jump at x=0! • Interior layer at x=0
Harmonic Oscillator Potential in 1D • Matched asymptotic approximation • Width of interior layer:
Thomas-Fermi (or semiclassical) limit • In 1D with strongly repulsive interaction • Box potential • Harmonic potential • In 1D with strongly attractive interaction
Numerical methods • Runge-Kutta method: (M. Edwards and K. Burnett, Phys. Rev. A, 95’) • Analytical expansion: (R. Dodd, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stan., 96’) • Explicit imaginary time method: (S. Succi, M.P. Tosi et. al., PRE, 00’) • Minimizing by FEM: (Bao & W. Tang, JCP, 02’) • Normalized gradient flow:(Bao & Q. Du, SIAM Sci. Comput., 03’) • Backward-Euler + finite difference (BEFD) • Time-splitting spectral method (TSSP) • Gauss-Seidel iteration method: (W.W. Lin et al., JCP, 05’) • Continuation method: W. W. Lin, etc., C. S. Chien, etc
Imaginary time method • Idea: Steepest decent method + Projection • The first equation can be viewed as choosing in GPE • For linear case: (Bao & Q. Du, SIAM Sci. Comput., 03’) • For nonlinear case with small time step, CNGF
Normalized gradient glow • Idea: letting time step go to 0 (Bao & Q. Du, SIAM Sci. Comput., 03’) • Energy diminishing • Numerical Discretizations • BEFD: Energy diminishing & monotone (Bao & Q. Du, SIAM Sci. Comput., 03’) • TSSP: Spectral accurate with splitting error (Bao & Q. Du, SIAM Sci. Comput., 03’) • BESP: Spectral accuracy in space & stable (Bao, I. Chern & F. Lim, JCP, 06’) • Uniformly convergent method (Bao&Chai, Comm. Comput. Phys, 07’)
Ground states • Numerical results (Bao&W. Tang, JCP, 03’; Bao, F. Lim & Y. Zhang, 06’) • Box potential • 1D-states 1D-energy 2D-surface 2D-contour • Harmonic oscillator potential: • 1D2D-surface 2D-contour • Optical lattice potential: • 1D2D-surface 2D-contour 3D next
Extension to rotating BEC • BEC in rotation frame(Bao, H. Wang&P. Markowich,Comm. Math. Sci., 04’) • Ground state: existence & uniqueness, quantized vortex • In 2D: In a rotational frame &With a fast rotation & optical lattice • In 3D: With a fast rotation next
Extension to two-component • Two-component (Bao, MMS, 04’) • Ground state • Existence & uniqueness • Quantized vortices & fractional index • Numerical methods & results: Crarter & domain wall
Results • Theorem • Assumptions • No rotation & Confining potential • Repulsive interaction • Results • Existence & Positive minimizer is unique • No minimizer in 3D when • Nonuniquness in attractive interaction in 1D • Quantum phase transition in rotating frame
Two-component with an external driving field • Two-component (Bao & Cai, 09’) • Ground state • Existence & uniqueness (Bao & Cai, 09’) • Limiting behavior & Numerical methods • Numerical results: Crarter & domain wall
Theorem (Bao & Cai, 09’) • No rotation & confining potential & • Existence of ground state!! • Uniqueness in the form under • At least two different ground states under– quantum phase transition • Limiting behavior
Extension to spin-1 • Spin-1 BEC (Bao & Wang, SINUM, 07’; Bao & Lim, SISC 08’, PRE 08’) • Continuous normalized gradient flow(Bao & Wang, SINUM, 07’) • Normalized gradient flow (Bao & Lim, SISC 08’) • Gradient flow + third projection relation