1 / 23

Survey of Medical Informatics

Survey of Medical Informatics. CS 493 – Fall 2004 September 13, 2004. Federal Leadership and Public-Private Partnerships. Chapter 3: Patient Safety - Achieving a New Standard of Care. IOM Report. Federal Leadership Needed. To streamline standards development process

tea
Download Presentation

Survey of Medical Informatics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Survey of Medical Informatics CS 493 – Fall 2004 September 13, 2004

  2. Federal Leadership and Public-Private Partnerships Chapter 3: Patient Safety - Achieving a New Standard of Care. IOM Report

  3. Federal Leadership Needed • To streamline standards development process • To promote public-private partnerships

  4. Standards in three different areas • Interchange standards • Terminology standards • Knowledge representation standards

  5. Data Interchange Standards

  6. Data Interchange Standards • Three mechanisms in play • Federal mandates • Consensus balloting in voluntary organizations • De-facto standards • Figure 3.1, pg 98 of the IOM book • Box 3-1, pg 99

  7. Consensus Balloting Process • Process used by HL7, IEEE and NCPDP • Draft circulated to Standards Development Organization (SDO) members and other interested parties • Reviewers cannot be all vendors – a 50% balance is maintained between vendors and users • All comments reviewed and negative ballots has to be reconciled • 90% or greater consensus needed to pass the standard for data interchange. Majority in most other cases.

  8. ANSI process • ANSI approves the standards proposed by SDOs. Once approved, they become American National Standards. • Standards need to be reviewed at least every 5 years for relevance.

  9. Implementing Standards • Conformance assurance for standards compliance • Accreditors check compliance • Can be either be public – National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation program run by NIST • Or private – American Association for Laboratory Accreditation

  10. European Standards and overlapping efforts • Comite’ European de Normalisation (CEN) • ANSI counterpart in Europe • Significant overlap in standards body roles and responsibilities (Table 3-1 – page 102) • Standards in US are formulated by voluntary participation by vendors and providers • Europe, Japanese, Australian and others rely on government funds to establish standards for their country.

  11. Terminologies

  12. Terminologies • Over 150 terminology systems in use • Very little standardization – not interoperable • International Classification of Diseases [ICD] • Box 3-2 – pg 104

  13. Knowledge Representation standards

  14. Knowledge representation • 1997 Report by the National Committee on Quality Assurance • National rate for an annual diabetic eye exam is 38.4% • AHRQ  Evidence-based practice centers (EPCs http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epc/ ), primary care practice-based research networks (PBRNs - http://www.ahrq.gov/research/pbrnfact.htm ) and Integrated Delivery System Research Network (IDSRN - http://www.ahrq.gov/research/idsrn.htm )

  15. Evidence-based guidelines • 13 EPCs  Goal is to develop guidelines based on rigorous analysis of scientific literature • To translate these guidelines into computer readable format is the challenge to the informatics community. • PBRN  for example the role of antibiotics in the care of acute otitis media (ear infection) • IDSRN  44 IDSRN projects funded – quality measurement and improvement, bioterrorism, information technology, organization and financing, disparities in access to care. • Cochrane Collaboration: UK-based effort at developing reliable guidelines for practice http://www.cochrane.org/index0.htm • The Centers for Education and Research on Therapeutics (CERTs) – program of AHRQ in consort with FDA to conduct research and provide education on the optimal use of drugs, medical devices, and biological products. http://www.certs.hhs.gov/ • MedBiquitous : consortium with goals to create educational environment that is tied to the practice of medicine. http://www.medbiq.org/index.html

  16. Reporting Standards • CMS & Premier demonstration: • http://www.cms.hhs.gov/researchers/demos/phqidemo.asp • http://www.cms.hhs.gov/quality/hospital/PremierMeasures.pdf • Medicare Equity and Access Act: • http://www.theorator.com/bills108/hr2033.html • DHHS has given a contract to Kevric Corp to integrate patient safety reporting within DHHS. • Appendix C [need to check] • Quality Interagency Coordination Task Force (QuIC) • http://www.quic.gov/index.htm • Diabetes Quality Improvement Project

  17. Reporting Standards • National Quality Forum (NQF) • http://www.qualityforum.org/ • National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) • http://www.ncqa.org/ • HEDIS – Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set – to compare commercial, Medicaid and Medicare managed health plans • Consumer Assessment of Health Plans, the Diabetes Quality Improvement Project, and the Health Outcomes Survey. • JCAHO • http://www.jcaho.org/ • Core Measures: http://www.jcaho.org/pms/core+measures/index.htm • FACCT – Foundation for Accountability • http://www.facct.org/facct/site/facct/facct/home • Consumer Information Framework: Basics, staying healthy, getting better, living with illness, and changing needs • IOM Recommendation: QuIC be given the lead role to coordinate reporting standards and work with NQF, NCQA, JCAHO & FACCT.

  18. National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics • Has the lead role in identifying and recommending clinical data standards. • HIPAA standards established: • ANSI ASC X12N EDI standard for administrative and financial transactions • NCPDP standard for pharmacy billing transactions. • Adopted: ICD-9 CM, HCPCS, NDCs, Common Dental Terminology – CDT-2 • Identifiers for employers • Privacy rules that safeguards personal health information • Rules for claims attachment are in progress

  19. Consolidated Health Informatics Initiative • CHI members include: • DHHS, NCVHS, VHA, DoD, Indian Health Service, Dept of Agriculture, EPA & FDA. • Goal of CHI is to articulate and execute a coherent vision and strategy for the adoption of interoperability standards in healthcare. • DHHS, DoD & VHA have announced that they will adopt: HL7, NCPDP, IEEE 1073, DICOM & LOINC based largely on the recommendations from CHI.

  20. Public Health Data Standards Consortium • http://www.phdatastandards.info/ • Organization that promote data standards that serve the interest of public health services • Membership includes: • CDC, AHRQ, CMS, managed care organizations, business coalitions and consumer groups

  21. National Alliance for Health Information Technology • http://www.aha.org/nahit/about.html • Over 100 members from: • Providers: Hospitals, health systems, medical groups • Payors: Insurance companies, managed care organizations • Supply chain: pharmaceutical, medical device manufacturers • Other stakeholders: government, standards bodies • Promote adoption of consensus-based standards leading to a national health information infrastructure

  22. Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise • HIMSS, RSNA started this collaborative effort in 1998. • Process overview: • Identify integration scenarios/problems • Specify applicable technology standards that can address the integration profile • Recruit vendors to implement and showcase solution to the integration problem • Development and dissemination of integration profile documents

  23. IOM recommendations • Figure 3-2, pg 120

More Related