1 / 37

Instructional Support Leadership Network

Instructional Support Leadership Network. Kentucky Valley Educational Cooperative November 17 and 18, 2011. Today’s Targets. Engineer student discussions, analyze student work, and provide feedback in mathematics.

Download Presentation

Instructional Support Leadership Network

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Instructional Support Leadership Network Kentucky Valley Educational Cooperative November 17 and 18, 2011

  2. Today’s Targets • Engineer student discussions, analyze student work, and provide feedback in mathematics. • Analyze quality indicators of Instructional Rigor and Student Engagement through the implementation of the Literacy Design Collaborative Model (LDC). • Become aware of the Publishers’ Criteria document set forth by the writers of the ELA CCS standards and the resulting instructional implications. • Self-Analyze “Using feedback to motivate students” • Identify explicit connections to Teacher/Principal Effectiveness Frameworks

  3. ISLN Mathematics InfoNov. 17th and 18th, 2011 So, what do we do with the FALs now?

  4. November’s Learning Targets • Participants will deepen their understanding of the process of a FAL. • Participants can analyze student work in order to provide effective oral and written feedback to students to move their learning forward. • Participants can engineer an effective classroom discussion through the use of planning and questioning strategies.

  5. Beads Under the Cloud • Students complete the formative assessment. • Teacher collects the formative assessment and analyzes the student work for the purpose of providing feedback and arranging learning groups. • Teacher returns FA to students with feedback so they can revisit alone and with a partner or group.

  6. Group Work • Students talk about their own work and feedback with one another in order to come up with a better answer. • Students look at other examples of student work to determine strengths/weaknesses and to compare with their answers and their methods of solving. • Teacher circulates and takes notes to determine the order and content of the class discussion.

  7. Plenary Discussion • Teacher uses chart to call on students to participate in discussion. • Teacher uses questioning strategies to engage all students during the discussion. • Students have opportunity to gather more information to improve their answer yet again. • Teacher collects and analyzes student work and provides further feedback.

  8. Why the focus on FALs? • The FAL process is just good teaching. • Advocates “productive struggle” and students doing the thinking. • Collaboration at its best.

  9. Where are we going from here? • Designing FAL-like tasks for use in our everyday teaching. WHY?

  10. Effective Instruction That Impacts Teaching Learning and Assessment English/Language Arts ISLN November, 2011

  11. Teaching Task Design

  12. A Great LDC Teaching Task • Addresses content essential to the discipline, inviting students to engage deeply in thinking and literacy practices around that issue • Makes effective use of the template task’s writing mode (argumentation, information/explanation, or narrative) • Selects reading texts that use and develop academic understanding and vocabulary

  13. A Great LDC Teaching Task • Designs a writing prompt that requires sustained writing and effective use of ideas and evidence from the reading texts • Establishes a teaching task that is both challenging and feasible for students, with a balance of reading demands and writing demands that works well for the intended grade and content

  14. Task 2 at the Basic Level • With argumentation, students may engage more quickly • With an essential question task, teachers do not have to manage a student research process: they simply select the texts • Without L2 and L3, the task will be a good starting point for teachers and students

  15. Kentucky’s Michelle Buroker took the template task, added a state standard and created the following task: Do cell phones have the potential to impact our health in a negative way? After reading scientific sources, write a report that addresses the question and support your position with evidence from the texts. Be sure to acknowledge competing views and give examples from past or current events or issues to illustrate and clarify your position.

  16. Literacy Design Collaborative Video

  17. Task Review Can This Task Be Saved?

  18. Task 12: What is the most important challenge you have met? After reading several personal challenge essays on the Internet, write an essay that defines your challenge and explains how you met it. Support your discussion with evidence from your research. Grade 6 Language Arts LDC: Teaching Task Design

  19. Task 21: What will it take to raise voter participation? After reading "Where Have All the Voters Gone?” and “Many will mark this election by not voting”, write a legislative proposal that addresses the question and analyzes the best legal changes to increase participation, providing examples to clarify your analysis. What conclusions or implications can you draw? A.P. U.S. Government LDC: Teaching Task Design

  20. Task 8: What will it take to raise voter participation? After reading "Where Have All the Voters Gone?” and “Many will mark this election by not voting”, write a legislative proposal that identifies a problem that keeps eligible citizens from voting and argues for a solution that can increase turnout by 10 percent or more. A.P. U.S. Government LDC: Teaching Task Design

  21. A Sample of Instructional Planning

  22. Cluster 2: The Reading Process

  23. Cluster 3: Transition to Writing

  24. Cluster 4: Writing Process

  25. Reviewing All the Pieces Template Task 2 Congruent Lessons Teaching Task Instructional Planning Skills Mini Tasks

  26. Publisher’s Criteria Purpose of the document: • Provide publishers and curriculum developers guidance with creating materials that align with the Common Core State Standards • The document articulates criteria for ELA materials as well as materials for history/social studies, science, and technical areas and offers suggested criteria for teachers and administrators selecting materials. The criteria have implications for teaching and learning.

  27. Publisher’s Criteria • Shorter more challenging texts should be used in the classroom. Modeling of close reading and re-reading should be provided so that students can independently read complex texts. Some full length works should be read. • Students should write to sources as part of careful analysis and research on topics

  28. November ELA Network Meeting Focus Literacy Design Collaborative and CHETL • Connect ELA anchor standard embedded within teaching task 2 with grade level deconstructed standards • Create and/or revise instructional plans • Embedded connections to CHETL Other Network Goals: • Develop a working knowledge of the publishers’ criteria and its’ implications for teaching and learning • Formative Assessment • Identifying the 5 characteristics of descriptive feedback • Leadership and Personal Goal Setting • Professional book studies

  29. “They can help students know what good work looks like from the beginning of their learning, help them compare their work to this standard of quality for strengths and needs, and help them learn to close the gap between the two.”A.B.Q. p. 79

  30. Making Connections To The Effectiveness Frameworks Do Today’s ISLN Presentations Connect to the Professional Growth and Effectiveness Frameworks?

  31. PROVIDING QUALITY FEEDBACK Accomplished Descriptor: Develops and uses formative and summative assessments to determine student progress, guides instruction, and provides specific feedback for students. (Domain: Instruction)

  32. Engineering Student Discussions Accomplished Descriptor: -Integrates questioning techniques that help students understand content across all thinking and reasoning levels. -Uses various methods (e.g., discovery, investigative and inquiry learning) to engage and challenge all students’ development of 21st Century Skills • critical thinking and problem solving, • creative and innovative thinking, • collaboration and communication,

  33. Analyzing Student Work Accomplished Descriptor:Analyzes student work and performance data to determine both individual and class progress

  34. Quality indicators of Instructional Rigor and Student Engagement through the implementation of the Literacy Design Collaborative Model Accomplished Descriptor: Uses various methods (e.g., discovery, investigative and inquiry learning) to engage and challenge all students’ development of 21st Century Skills • critical thinking and problem solving, • creative and innovative thinking, • collaboration and communication, • Skills for developing media literacy.

  35. Merry Christmas

More Related