1 / 17

The Implications of a High Cosmic-Ray Ionization Rate in Diffuse Interstellar Clouds

The Implications of a High Cosmic-Ray Ionization Rate in Diffuse Interstellar Clouds. Nick Indriolo, Brian D. Fields, Benjamin J. McCall. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Image credit: NASA/CXC/UMass Amherst/M.D.Stage et al. Cosmic Ray Basics.

Download Presentation

The Implications of a High Cosmic-Ray Ionization Rate in Diffuse Interstellar Clouds

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Implications of a High Cosmic-Ray Ionization Rate in Diffuse Interstellar Clouds Nick Indriolo, Brian D. Fields, Benjamin J. McCall University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign MWAM 08

  2. Image credit: NASA/CXC/UMass Amherst/M.D.Stage et al. Cosmic Ray Basics • Charged particles (e-, e+, p, α, etc.) with high energy (103-1019 eV) • Galactic cosmic rays are primarily accelerated in supernovae remnants

  3. Background • Cosmic rays have several impacts on the interstellar medium, all of which produce some observables • Ionization: molecules • CR + H2→ H2+ + e- + CR • H2+ + H2 → H3+ + H • Spallation: light element isotopes • [p, α] + [C, N, O] → [6Li, 7Li, 9Be, 10B, 11B] • Nuclear excitation: gamma rays • [p, α] + [C, O] → [C*, O*] → γ (4.4, 6.13 MeV)

  4. Motivations • Many astrochemical processes depend on ionization • Cosmic rays are the primary source of ionization in cold interstellar clouds • Low-energy cosmic rays (2-10 MeV) are the most efficient at ionization • The cosmic ray spectrum below ~1 GeV cannot be directly measured at Earth

  5. Example Cosmic Ray Spectra 1 - Herbst, E., & Cuppen, H. M. 2006, PNAS, 103, 12257 2 - Spitzer, L., Jr., & Tomasko, M. G. 1968, ApJ, 152, 971 3 - Kneller, J. P., Phillips, J. R., & Walker, T. P. 2003, ApJ, 589, 217 Shading – Mori, M. 1997, ApJ, 478, 225 4 - Valle, G., Ferrini, F., Galli, D., & Shore, S. N. 2002, ApJ, 566, 2525 - Hayakawa, S., Nishimura, S., & Takayanagi, T. 1961, PASJ, 13, 1846 - Nath, B. B., & Biermann, P. L. 1994, MNRAS, 267, 447Points – AMS Collaboration, et al. 2002, Phys. Rep., 366, 331

  6. Motivations • Recent results from H3+ give an ionization rate of ζ2=4×10-16 s-1 • Given a cosmic ray spectrum and cross section, the ionization rate can be calculated theoretically Indriolo, N., Geballe, T. R., Oka, T., & McCall, B. J. 2007, ApJ, 671, 1736

  7. Cosmic-Ray Ionization Rate (ζ2×10-17 s-1) Spectrum ζ2 (diffuse) ζ2 (dense) Propagated 1.4 4.3 Hayakawa et al. 165 96 Spitzer & Tomasko 0.7 0.7 Nath & Biermann 260 34 Kneller et al. 1.3 1.0 Valle et al. 3.6 2.7 Herbst & Cuppen 0.9 0.9 Observations 40a 3b Results from Various Spectra a – Indriolo, N., Geballe, T. R., Oka, T., & McCall, B. J. 2007, ApJ, 671, 1736 b – van der Tak, F. F. S., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2000, A&AL, 358, L79

  8. p-4.3 p-2.0 p0.8 f=0.01 p-2.7 Add Flux at Low Energies

  9. Cosmic-Ray Ionization Rate (ζ2×10-17 s-1) Spectrum ζ2 (diffuse) ζ2 (dense) Broken Power Law 36 8.6 Carrot 37 2.6 Observations 40 3 High Flux Results • This is no surprise, as these spectra were tailored to reproduce the diffuse cloud ionization rate results

  10. Carrot Construction

  11. Light Element Results a – Anders, E. & Grevesse, N. 1989 Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 53, 197

  12. Diffuse Gamma-Ray Flux from the Central Radian (10-5 s-1 cm-2 rad-1) Energy INTEGRALa Propagated Power Law Carrot 4.44 MeV 10 0.9 8.3 3.0 6.13 MeV 10 0.4 5.9 2.4 a – Teegarden, B. J., & Watanabe, K. 2006, ApJ, 646, 965 Gamma-Ray Results

  13. Energy Constraints • There are approximately 3±2 supernovae per century, each releasing about 1051 erg of mechanical energy • The carrot spectrum requires 0.18×1051 erg per century, while the broken power law requires 0.17×1051 erg per century • Both are well within constraints

  14. Acceleration Mechanism • Carrot spectrum shape does not match acceleration by supernovae remnants • Voyager 1 observations at the heliopause show a steep slope at low energies • Possible that “astropauses” are accelerating cosmic rays throughout the Galaxy Fig. 2 - Stone, E. et al. 2005, Science, 309, 2017

  15. Conclusions • Carrot spectrum explains high ionization rate, and is broadly consistent with various observables • p-4.3 power law is inconsistent with acceleration from SNR • Perhaps weak shocks in the ISM are responsible for the vast majority of low-energy cosmic rays

  16. Brian Fields The McCall Group Acknowledgments

  17. Cross Sections Bethe, H. 1933, Hdb. d Phys. (Berlin: J. Springer), 24, Pt. 1, 491Read, S. M., & Viola, V. E. 1984, Atomic Data Nucl. Data, 31, 359 Meneguzzi, M. & Reeves, H. 1975, A&A, 40, 91

More Related