1 / 9

Methods in Gravitational Shear Measurements

Methods in Gravitational Shear Measurements. Michael Stefferson Mentor: Elliott Cheu Arizona Space Grant Consortium Statewide Symposium Tucson, Arizona April 17, 2010. Outline . Research background Research objectives General progression and issues PSF measurement Bayesian method

teagan
Download Presentation

Methods in Gravitational Shear Measurements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Methods in Gravitational Shear Measurements Michael Stefferson Mentor: Elliott Cheu Arizona Space Grant Consortium Statewide Symposium Tucson, Arizona April 17, 2010

  2. Outline • Research background • Research objectives • General progression and issues • PSF measurement • Bayesian method • Areas of future study • Acknowledgments

  3. Research background • Gravitational shear is the distortion of galaxy due to weak gravitational lensing. • Gravity bends the fabric of space-time. Thus, the light from galaxies is bent causing a distorted or sheared image of the star. • The interest of the our research was to understand various shear measurement methods. We are interested in improving algorithms for gravitational shear measurements for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST). • For our interests, the measurement of gravitational shear can be used to map the dark matter distribution in the universe. • Image courtesy of www.lsst.org

  4. Research objectives • Gain a general idea on how shear can be measured. • Understand the factors that effect shear measurements. • Still working to optimize shear measurements. • Great08 challenge presents various methods from several different teams. • Great08 did not use real data, but provided a sample data to make shear measurements. • Run several programs to understand a logical path to results from a given set of data. • Worked through the code to understand the programming behind shear measurements.

  5. General progression and issues • Main issues with measuring shear: atmospheric effects, signal is convoluted with a point spread function, pixilation. • Process begins with the deconvolution of the point spread function (PSF) from point sources, stars. • PSF causes images to appear rounder. • Once PSF is deconvoluted, this information can be used on galaxy images. • PSF can vary across an image. • Code exists to account for PSF effects, but optimizing PSF deconvolution is crucial for shear measurements. • Great care in obtaining a high ratio of signal/noise. Noise causes image to appear more elliptical. • Pixilation

  6. PSF measurement • The image is convoluted with the PSF. • Signal is convoluted with a convolution kernel. • GREAT08 used a known kernel. • Can be solved using a fast Fourier transform (FFT) to get functions in frequency space. • Other methods involve stacking images. Stacking images allows to estimate the surface brightness profile. • For a varying PSF, divide the image in invariant zones. From there, FFT can done on these zones. • Various deconvolution methods exist to determine the input signal.

  7. Bayesian method • One sample method was Bayesian probability method used in lensfit code by T. Kitching and L. Miller. • Bayesian method measures the shapes of galaxies through a model-fitting approach. • Bayesian probability is used to find the full posterior probability in ellipticity. • Fits galaxy individually and takes a mean average to estimate the ellipticity. • With a known ellipticity, the shear can be determined. • Strengths: lensfit code produced a quality factor nearly 10 times greater than other codes submitted. Uses realistic galaxy profiles which other codes fail to do. • Weaknesses: Has to fit each galaxy individually which results in longer computation time.

  8. Areas of future study • Further analysis of software • New area of study would be to determine what galaxy sizes are ideal for shear measurements. • Along same lines, how does redshift effect which galaxies are ideal for shear measurements?

  9. Thanks • Dr. Elliot Cheu • Mentor • Dr. Lance Miller • Lensfit • Questions/comments/concerns

More Related