1 / 5

Results on Characteristic Vectors

In this paper we have established the bounds of the extreme characteristic roots of nlap G and sLap G by their traces. Also found the bounds for n th characteristic roots of nLap G and sLap G . M M Jariya "Results on Characteristic Vectors" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-3 | Issue-5 , August 2019, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd28006.pdf Paper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/mathemetics/other/28006/results-on-characteristic-vectors/m-m-jariya<br>

Download Presentation

Results on Characteristic Vectors

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development(IJTSRD) Volume 3 Issue 5, August 2019 Available Online: www.ijtsrd.com e-ISSN: 2456-6470 RESULTS ON CHARACTERISTIC VECTORS M M Jariya G.A.S.C.BAVLA. E−mail: mahesh.jariya@gmail.com —————————————————————————————————— Abstract In this paper we have established the bounds of the extreme characteristic roots of nlap(G) and sLap(G) by their traces. Also found the bounds for n-th character- istic roots of nLap(G) and sLap(G). ———————————————————————————————————— Key words : characteristic root, Normalized laplacian matrix, signless laplacian matrix. AMS subject classification number : 05C78. @IJTSRD | Volume-3 | Issue-5 | July-August 2019 Page No. 1733

  2. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development(IJTSRD) @www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470 1. Introduction let G=(V,E) be a graph with |v| = n and |E| = e. kidenote the degree of uifor ui∈ V miis the set of neighbours of ui i ∼ j denote the adjacent of uiand uj. Adj(G) denote the adjacency matrix. Lap(G) denote the laplacian matrix. dig(G) denote the diagonal matrix. It is clear Lap(G) = dig(G) − Adj(G) Definition−1 Normalized Laplacian matrix: let G=(V,E) be a graph then the Normalized laplacian matrix of G is denoted by nLap(G) and given by nLap(G)= [rij]mmwhere rij= 1 : i = j −1 √ kikj: i ∼ j = 0 : otherwise = Definition−2 Signless Laplacian matrix: let G=(V,E) be a graph then the Signless laplacian matrix of G is denoted by sLap(G) and given by sLap(G)= [sij]mmwhere sij= ki: i = j = 1 : i ∼ j = 0 : otherwise Since nlap(G) is real symmetric matrix and characteristic roots of nlap(G) is denoted by µ1(nlap(G)) ≥ ··· ≥ µm(nlap(G)) and slap(G) is also real symmetric matrix and characteristic roots of slap(G) is denoted by µ1(nlap(G)) ≥ ··· ≥ µm(nlap(G)). @IJTSRD | Volume-3 | Issue-5 | July-August 2019 Page No. 1734

  3. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development(IJTSRD) @www.ijtsrd.com e-ISSN: 2456-6470 Following theorem−1.1 and theorem−1.2 are used to find bounds for characteristic roots of nlap(G) and slap(G). Theorem−1.1 Let V and µ = [µj] be non zero column vectors, e=(1,1,1,...,1)T, n=µTe B=Im−eeT -s√mVTBV ≤ VTµ − mVTe = VTBµ ≤ s√mVTBV P(µi− µm)2= m[s2+ (n − µm)2] m, m, s2=µTBµ and Imis a unit matrix. Let µm≤ ··· ≤ µ2≤ µ1then, m P(µ1− µj)2= m[s2+ (µ1− µn)2] µm≤ n − Theorem−1.2 Let B be m×m with complex entries. A+is conjugate transpose of A. Let B = AA+whose characteristic roots are µm(C) ≤ ··· ≤ µ2(C) ≤ µ1(C) Then n − s√m − 1 ≤ µ2 n + s s √m−1≤ n + √m−1≤ µ1. s m(C) ≤ n − m(1) ≤ n + s√m − 1. Trace(B) m = n. √m−1. s √m−1≤ µ2 − n = s2and Trace(c2) m Where @IJTSRD | Volume-3 | Issue-5 | July-August 2019 Page No. 1735

  4. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development(IJTSRD) @www.ijtsrd.com e-ISSN: 2456-6470 2. Main Results Theorem−2.1 Let G is simple graph, nLap(G) is normalized laplacian matrix with char- acteristic roots µm(nLap(G)) ≤ ··· ≤ µ2(nLap(G)) ≤ µ1(nLap(G)) Then µm(nLap(G)) ≤ i<j,i∼j µ1(nLap(G)) ≥ i<j,i∼j µ1(nLap(G)) ≤ i<j,i∼j Proof : It is obvious s s s r r q P P P trace[lap(G)]4−mn2 m(m−1) 2 m 1 (1 + kikj+ trace[lap(G)]4−mn2 m(m−1) 2 m 1 (1 + kikj+ (trace[lap(G)]4 2 m 1 − n2)(m − 1) (1 + kikj+ n P 1 Trace(nLap(G))2= m + 2 kikjand i<j,i∼j m P j=1(1+P kikj)2+2P P kikj−P kk√ √ 1 1 2 kikj)2 Trace(nLap(G))4= i<j( i∼j i∼j k∈mi∩mj Since nLap(G) is real symmetric matrix, we found result from theorem−1.2. Illustration−2.2 Let G = (V,E), V = {1,2,3,4,5,6}, E = {(5,6),(4,5),(3,5),(3,4),(2,6),(2,4), (2,3),(1,5),(1,2)} Then Theorem−2.3 Let G is simple graph, sLap(G) is normalized laplacian matrix with char- acteristic roots µm(sLap(G)) ≤ ··· ≤ µ2(sLap(G)) ≤ µ1(sLap(G)) Then µm(sLap(G)) ≤ i<j,i∼j µ1(sLap(G)) ≥ i<j,i∼j µ1(sLap(G)) ≤ i<j,i∼j Proof : It is obvious s s s r r q P P P trace[lap(G)]4−mn2 m(m−1) 2 m 1 (1 + kikj+ trace[lap(G)]4−mn2 m(m−1) 2 m 1 (1 + kikj+ (trace[lap(G)]4 2 m 1 − n2)(m − 1) (1 + kikj+ n P 1 Trace(sLap(G))2= m + 2 kikjand i<j,i∼j m P j=1(1+P kikj)2+2P P kikj−P kk√ √ 1 1 2 kikj)2 Trace(sLap(G))4= i<j( i∼j i∼j k∈mi∩mj Since sLap(G) is real symmetric matrix, we found result from theorem−1.2. Illustration−2.4 Let G = (V,E), V = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7}, E = {(4,6),(4,5),(3,5),(2,3),(1,7),(1,6), (1,5),(1,4),(1,3),(1,2)} Then @IJTSRD | Volume-3 | Issue-5 | July-August 2019 Page No. 1736

  5. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development(IJTSRD) @www.ijtsrd.com e-ISSN: 2456-6470 4 Concluding Remarks : I have presented results on connecting the bounds of the extreme characteristic roots of normalized laplacian matrix and signless laplacian matrix. and using it found found the bounds for n-th characteristic roots of normalized and signless laplacian matrix. References [1] J. Cheeger, A lower bound for the smallest eigenvalue of the Laplacian, in Problems in analysis, (R.C. Gunnig, ed.), Princeton Univ. Press, 1970, pp.195199. [2] M. Marcus, H. Minc, A survey of matrix theory and matrix inequalities, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Mass., 1964. [3] J. A. Gallian, A dynamic survey on graph labeling, The Electronics Journal of Com- binatorics, 17(2014), ]DS6. [4] D. Cvetkovic, Signless Laplacians and line graphs, Bull. Acad. Serbe Sci. Arts, Cl. Sci. Math. Natur., Sci. Math. 131 (2005), No. 30, 8592. [5] D. Cvetkovic, P. Rowlinson, S. Simic, Eigenspaces of Graphs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997. @IJTSRD | Volume-3 | Issue-5 | July-August 2019 Page No. 1737

More Related