E N D
1. Cost Realism and Analysis —Renewed Focus in Today’s Environment June 2002
2. Agenda Environment
Cost Performance
Path Forward
Audience Questions
3. Environment
4. Environment Defense Industry Consolidated into a Few Large Players
Intense Competition
Budget Impact
High Debt. . .
Competitive Stratification
5. Environment Industry Margins Eroded-Single Digit ROS Common R&D Subsidies: X-33; EELV; Other Cooperative Agreements
Fierce Competition: FIA, JSF, DD(X)
Over Supply: Commercial Satellites & Launch VehiclesR&D Subsidies: X-33; EELV; Other Cooperative Agreements
Fierce Competition: FIA, JSF, DD(X)
Over Supply: Commercial Satellites & Launch Vehicles
6. Eliminated Paid Cost Rule
Ordered End of R&D Subsidies
Increased Progress Payments
Encouraging Performance-based Payments
Permit Contractor Share in Cost Savings EnvironmentFavorable DoD Policy Changes Emerging
8. EnvironmentDoD Budget Authority
9. QDR From “Threat” Based to “Capability” Based
Key Goals
Assure Allies
Dissuade Adversaries
Deter Aggression
Decisively Defeat
Operational Challenges
Protect the Homeland
Guarantee Information Systems
Project Power
Deny Sanctuary, Greater Surveillance
Strengthen Space Operations
Apply New IT Concepts (C4ISR)
10. Environment Budget Stability Improving
Spiral Development
Nunn-McCurdy Enforcement
11. Environment Summary
Defense Industry an Oligopoly with Unfavorable Operating Margins
Government Receptive to Improving Industry
National Security Dependent on Successful Transformation From “Threat” to “Capability” Deterrence
The Path To Success is Through Solid Execution and Improved Performance
12. Cost Performance
13. Cost Performance Too Many Major Overruns
SBIRS High
Space Station
Global Hawk
Theater Ballistic Missile Defense
What’s Causing The Cost Growth. . .?
14. Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance
15. Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance Proceeding Rightly From a Wrong Premise
16. Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d) New Learning Curve Theory
17. Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d) Do Not Mistake the Act of Planning for Actually Having a Plan
18. New Moore’s Law Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d)
19. New Math Concepts Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d)
20. Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d) Test As You Fly
21. Schedule, Schedule, Schedule Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d)
22. Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d) COTS = Certain Overrun To Schedule
23. Soft Funding = Hard Times Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d)
24. Top 10 Reasons For Poor Cost Performance (Cont’d) Precision Without Accuracy
25. Path Forward
26. Path ForwardGood Example - JSF Acquisition Approach Phased Down Select to Award
Parametric Life Cycle Cost Data by Anticipated Phase From Each Competitor
Shoulder-to-Shoulder Review Reconciliation of Cost Estimates Between USG and Contractor
Encourage, Identify, Fund and Prototype Cost Reduction Candidates Early During the Down Select Process
Do Not Encourage Contractor Investment
27. Weight Evaluation Criteria Toward Performance and Realistic Cost, Not Lowest Cost
Recognize the Risk Associated with the Work Scope and Use the Appropriate Contract Type
Development – Cost Plus
Production – Wait Until Risk has Been Mitigated
Incentivize the Winner for Good, Balanced Performance: Technical, Schedule and Cost Path ForwardGood Example - JSF Acquisition Approach
28. Path ForwardContractors Should. . . Vigilantly Protect Against “The Top Ten”
Perform Independent Cost Evaluations (ICE) of Their “Single Best Estimates” to Validate and Substantiate Credibility
Reconcile Program Estimates & Independent Assessments Between Customer & Contractor
Understand Differences & Rationale But. . .
Maintain Independence & Propriety
29. Path ForwardContractors Should . . . (Continued) Track Estimates & Calibrate/Adjust Estimating Systems/Process/Models for Improved Accuracy
Establish & Maintain “Headlight” Metrics Above & Beyond Standard Earned Value to Assure Early Warning of Performance & Risk Issues
30. Conclusion U.S. Government and Aerospace Contractors Must “Partner For Success” While Maintaining Arms Length Relationship
Open and Candid Communication To Ensure Success
Proper Contract Type
Successful Business Plans For Customer & Contractor
Stable Program Requirements & Funding