150 likes | 266 Views
Program Area: Logistics, business & framework. What Attractive maritime transport mode Develop logistic systems, business models, regulatory & financial frameworks energy efficiency reduce negative impact on health, safety and environment competitiveness of shipping
E N D
Program Area: Logistics, business & framework What • Attractive maritime transport mode • Develop • logistic systems, business models, regulatory & financial frameworks • energy efficiency • reduce negative impact on health, safety and environment • competitiveness of shipping • profitable & growing shipping sector
Program Area: Logistics, business & framework Why • Low oil price → hampered development • Now significant expense → improvement focus • Stricter environmental regulations • Future increased need for transport • Potential identified • Several actors can contribute & cooperate Who • Research: Chalmers, GU, SSPA, IVL, KTH, VTI, Conlogic, Linnéuniv., … • Industry: DHL, Schenker, ABB, Volvo, IKEA, Sandviken, Sirius Shipping, Therntank, Donsö Shipping, Furutank, Preem, Skangass, Methanex, .. • ….
Program Area: Logistics, business & framework Proposed fields: • Logistics solutions for energy efficient shipping • Slow steaming logistics and operations • Logistical solutions for reduced time in port & turn-around time • Improved intermodal interface and coordination • Load factor optimization
Program Area: Logistics, business & framework Proposed fields: • Business models for energy efficient shipping • Freight contract design for energy efficient shipping • Maximise effectiveness & efficiency for shippers (verkan - duglighet) • Schemes for sharing of costs & benefits of increased efficiency
Program Area: Logistics, business & framework Proposed fields: • Profitable zero emission shipping • Emission regulation impact on system sustainability & performance • Marginal risk management of investment in new unproven technologies • Marginal risk sharing schemes between private & public sectors • Cost neutrality and internalization between transport modes
Program Area: Logistics, business & framework Exempel på projektförslag: Konkurrensneutralitet mellan trafikslag. Korrekt allokering av resurser. Totalt utnyttjande av samhällsnyttan. Hållbar utveckling. • Effektåtgång för transportproduktion – jämförande studie - olika trafikslag • Skatte- & avgiftsstruktur för konkurrensneutralitet mellan trafikslag • Socioekonomiska effekter av ökning av sjöfartens miljö & säkerhetsprestanda • Internalisering av transporters externa kostnader (positiva & negativa)
Program Area: Logistics, business & framework Exempel på projektförslag: Trafikslagsskifte – från land till sjöss – närsjöfart, kustsjöfart och inre vattenvägar • Konceptutveckling, distributionslösningar • Destressing supply chain (H2020) business models, policy recommendations • Inre vattenvägar – tekniska komponenter & logistik • Mäta transporteffektivitet
Program Area: Logistics, business & framework Exempel på projektförslag: Slow steaming • Slow steaming Logistics (transocean trafik, Sjöfartsverket finansierar) • Slow steaming inom SECA, RoRo • Global konsekvensanalys av Slow steaming • Planering och styrning med hänsyn till Slow steaming
Program Area: Logistics, business & framework Utmaningar: • Beskrivna frågeställningar • Flera etablerade forskningsaktörer • Bra samarbetsklimat mellan forskning & industri • Hur ska resultaten tas vidare till implementering? • Vem driver, vem äger frågan? • Flera utmaningar?
Program Area: Alternative Energies What • Reduction of emissions and carbon footprint from shipping • Investigate • the use of new fuels • alternative propulsion techniques • Development steps – new fuels • technologies • fuel supply • risk and safety • maritime adaptation
Program Area: Alternative Energies Why • Meet SOx, NOx, and PM emission requirements • Reduce CO2emissions: Longer term – 2050Zero Vision target • Effship - possible solutions www.effship.com • SPIRETH - methanol & DME as marine fuels www.spireth.com • Methanol: the marine fuel of the future (TEN-T project converting main engines on Stena Germanica) • Strong Swedish position - several actors can contribute
Program Area: Alternative Energies Who • academy, institutes, authorities, classification societies, shipowners, engine suppliers, methanol producers, sub suppliers, design companies • Exempel på aktiva: Wärtsilä (bl a Gbg), Stena, ScandiNaos, SSPA, Lloyds, Halldor Topsö, Methanex, Chalmers, Volvo, Scania, Sjöfartsverket, Färjerederiet, ….
Program Area: Alternative Energies Proposed fields: • New building & conversion - alternative fuels (LNG, methanol, ..) • Demonstration/pilot installations • Develop alternative fuelscombustion technologies • Comparison of dual/retrofit options and “one fuel” technologies • Chemical modification for optimum performance • Infrastructure, distribution, bunkering • Risk & regulatory issues for maritime transport • Alternative propulsion techniques • Wind • Electricity
Program Area: Alternative Energies Exempel på projekt och förslag: • Pilot LNG (EU TEN-T, Samarbete ZVT, redare, SRF, SSPA, m fl) • Pilot Metanol (EU TEN-T, Samarbete ZVT, Stena, Wärtsilä) • Pre-ESPRIT (VGR, SSPA, ScandiNaos, Marine Benchmark) • SUMMETH (EU MARTEC, SSPA, ScandiNaos, VTT, Lunds Univ., Scania, Färjerederiet) • Elfärja Stena • ………….
Program Area: Alternative Energies Utmaningar: • Näringen (främst redare) får ta ett stort ansvar i utveckling • Huvudmaskintillverkare utvecklar nya lösningar • Mindre motorsegmentet – ombyggda ”land”motorer • Volvo, Scania har redan strikta utvecklingsprogram • Vem driver, vem äger frågan? • Flera utmaningar?