1 / 22

Building Your Career in Academia

Building Your Career in Academia. John Holcomb Cleveland State University MATHFEST 2010. For those of you motivated in positive ways …. For those motivated in negative ways …. DO NOT BE A VICTIM!. Just one more slogan …. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Scholarship.

tehya
Download Presentation

Building Your Career in Academia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Building Your Career in Academia John Holcomb Cleveland State University MATHFEST 2010

  2. For those of you motivated in positive ways …

  3. For those motivated in negative ways … DO NOT BE A VICTIM!

  4. Just one more slogan … Ignorance of the law is no excuse

  5. Scholarship • PUBLISH YOUR DISSERTATION AS SOON AS POSSIBLE! • Find out how many papers you need • Publishing • Keep a research diary/log • Revise/Resubmit as soon as possible • The journal review clock is not in your favor

  6. Scholarship • Attend themed conferences (with your own money if necessary) • Beg anyone and everyone for ideas on “doable” problems • Collaborate wisely • Spend a summer with a collaborator • Retrain (cautiously) if necessary

  7. Making time • Find a system that works for you • Block large chunks of time with caution • Use smaller chunks of time • Realize you will have to be flexible • Try to stay engaged

  8. Teaching • Criteria at CSU “fully-competent teacher” • Student evaluations matter • If scores are low find out why and address early • Master Teacher Swap • Get data on department norms • Seek Assistance

  9. Teaching • If peer review is required – make sure it happens • Do not be defensive • Ask for constructive help, especially if there are issues • Document effectiveness • Get in writing from colleagues that exams/syllabus are exemplary/reasonable and then document success rates • May be easier to do in upper level courses

  10. Teaching • Revise/Revamp courses cautiously • Do not assign too much homework • Consider on-line homework (MyMathLab, WebWorks, etc.) for lower level courses • Use answer keys shamelessly • Educate students about how to use the textbook

  11. Undergraduate Research • Can be used as a measure of teaching effectiveness • Lots of pros and cons

  12. Service • You have to do some … • Try to have a major impact on one or more committees • Be aware of the “single body” problem • It can be the issue that tips a scale (positively or negatively) • Get letters from colleagues as projects wrap up

  13. General Advice • Remember they want to tenure you • Develop and use mentors • Ask a bunch of people (from around the institution) the same questions • Realize there is selection bias among the tenured faculty • Evaluate where you are every 6 months • Do not let the “perfect” be the enemy of the “good”

  14. Consider Moving • You are probably at your most marketable at 3-4 years post dissertation • Let go of the idea of the perfect job in the perfect location

  15. Tenure is not the goal, a long and rewarding career is the goal!

  16. My Experience • 1995-2000 Youngstown State University • Masters granting comprehensive state university • Almost open enrollment • High Teaching load (12-15 hours per quarter) • Expectation of 2 peer reviewed papers for tenure

  17. My Experience • 2000-present Cleveland State University • Comprehensive Masters-granting institution • Open enrollment • Low Teaching load (8 hours per semester) • Higher research expectations

  18. Specific Experiences • Quality of Journals • Both institutions require peer-reviewed journals • Knowledge within mathematics that impact factors and citation indexes are not necessarily helpful • Acceptance rates are desired

  19. Specific Experiences • Get the AMS Notices Article • January 2005 issues of the Notices "Patterns of Research in Mathematics" by Jerrold Grossman.  • 43% of mathematicians have only published a single paper • 15% for 2 papers, 8% for 3, 5% for 4, and 4% for 5 papers, and 10% for 6-10 papers and 7% for 11-20 and 6% for 21-50 and 2 % for 51-100

  20. Publishing

  21. My Experiences • Grants • Funded grants have always counted as a paper or more • Credit for trying as well • Expository writing fine as long as peer-reviewed • Textbooks “count,” but that is not a path I recommend for the untenured

  22. My Experiences • Software development • Could “count” if usage or impact is documented • Writing a paper about it earns a “double”

More Related