130 likes | 259 Views
LOADING. 1%. 2%. 3%. 4%. 5%. 6%. 7%. 8%. 9%. 10%. 11%. 12%. 13%. 14%. 15%. 16%. 17%. 18%. 19%. 20%. 21%. 22%. 23%. 24%. 25%. 26%. 27%. 28%. 29%. 30%. 31%. 32%. 33%. 34%. 35%. 48%. 37%. 38%. 39%. 40%. 41%. 42%. 43%. 44%. 45%. 46%. 47%. 49%. 36%. 50%.
E N D
LOADING 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 11% 12% 13% 14% 15% 16% 17% 18% 19% 20% 21% 22% 23% 24% 25% 26% 27% 28% 29% 30% 31% 32% 33% 34% 35% 48% 37% 38% 39% 40% 41% 42% 43% 44% 45% 46% 47% 49% 36% 50% 87% 52% 53% 54% 55% 56% 57% 58% 59% 60% 61% 62% 63% 64% 65% 66% 67% 68% 69% 70% 71% 72% 73% 74% 75% 76% 77% 78% 79% 80% 81% 82% 83% 84% 85% 86% 98% 88% 89% 90% 100% 91% 92% 93% 94% 95% 96% 97% 51% 99%
The Title:POWER-AWARE ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN AD HOC WIRELESS NETWORKS The Author:JIA GENG LI,DAVID CORDES, JING YUAN ZHANG The Reporter: 张 焜
2. The classification of protocols 3. Introduction to the protocols 4. The summary 1. The necessity of conserving energy Abstract
Necessity of conserving energy Why? Limited Energy How? Routing Protocols
The classification Activity-based:power consumption Connectivity-based:effective connectivity
Active energy saving protocols HCB Model α=2
Maximizing network lifetime protocols Minimal Battery Cost Routing (MBCR)
Passive energy savings protocols Basic Energy Conserving Algorithm (BECA)
Topology control protocols Cone-based topology control algorithm
Energy efficient multicasting and broadcasting protocols • Broadcast Incremental Power (BIP—Tree-based) • The source node • Minimum power cost node • Including all the nodes
Energy efficient multicasting and broadcasting protocols Energy-Efficient Multicasting Routing Protocol (E2MRP—Graph-based) Minimum energy consumed per packet (MECP) Minimum maximum node cost (MMNC) cost function switcher (CFS) timer
Summary Future Work Localized routing algorithms Considering the transmission error rate Every layer of the protocol