1 / 50

RECURRENT IMPLANTATION FAILURE : an evidence-based approach

RECURRENT IMPLANTATION FAILURE : an evidence-based approach. Prof T C LI Professor of Reproductive Medicine & Surgery Sheffield, England. Istanbul, June 2010. Outline. Definition Endometrial factors Causes of endometrial abnormality How to investigate Treatment options.

tekli
Download Presentation

RECURRENT IMPLANTATION FAILURE : an evidence-based approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RECURRENT IMPLANTATION FAILURE : an evidence-based approach Prof T C LI Professor of Reproductive Medicine & Surgery Sheffield, England Istanbul, June 2010

  2. Outline • Definition • Endometrial factors • Causes of endometrial abnormality • How to investigate • Treatment options

  3. WHAT IS RECURRENT IMPLANTATION FAILURE?

  4. RECURRENT IMPLANTATION FAILURE • About 2/3 of centres in UK defined recurrent IVF failure as a failure to achieve a pregnancy after 3 completed fresh IVF-ET cycles (often excluding FER) (Tan et al 2005) • Failure to achieve a pregnancy after 3 IVF cycles, in which reasonably good embryos were transferred (Margalioth et al 2006) • Failure to achieve a pregnancy after a total of 10 or more embryos had been transferred to the uterus (Stern et al 2003) • Failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy following the transfer of six embryos in either fresh or frozen cycles in women aged less than 40 years

  5. A consensus on definition is urgently needed

  6. A consensus on definition is urgently needed Working Party Consensus Meeting

  7. WHY SHOULD IMPLANTATION FAIL TO TAKE PLACE ?

  8. BASIC IMPLANTATION PHYSIOLOGY endometrium embryo

  9. Evidence of endometrial abnormality in women with RIF

  10. Uterine NK cells & RIF • 37% of women with RIF had increase number of uNK cells (Ledee-Bataille, 2004) • Women with recurrent miscarriage had increase number of uNK cells compared with control subjects; women with RIF had even higher number of uNk cells (Sheffield data)

  11. Causes of Endometrial Abnormality • uterine cavity pathology

  12. Causes of Endometrial Abnormality • uterine cavity pathology • Structural uterine anomalies

  13. Outcome of pregnancies in women with uterine leiomyomas identified by sonography in the first trimester. Benson et al, 2001 • miscarriage rate • Control n=715 7% • Fibroid n=143 14% • Multiple fibroids n=55 24%

  14. What is the abnormality?

  15. Classification of congenital uterine anomalies American Fertility Society. Fertil Steril 1988;49:944–955.

  16. Causes of Endometrial Abnormality • uterine cavity pathology • Structural uterine anomalies • Endocrine aberrations

  17. Endocrine Aberrations • High Oestrogens • High BMI • High androgens

  18. Impact of high BMI on miscarriage: spontaneous and assisted conceptions

  19. In a donor oocyte programme, embryo recipents with high BMI had a higher miscarriage rate than receipents with normal BMI Bellver et al 2003 Fertil Steril 79:1136-40

  20. ANDROGENS • Comparison of LH timed plasma samples showed that women with RM (n=43) had higher FAI than fertile control (n=10) • androgen levels were negatively correlated with uterine fluid PP14 concentrations Okon et al,1998

  21. The Prognostic Value of Free Androgen Index (FAI) in Recurrent Miscarriage 229 cases with FAI ≤ 5 Miscarriage Rate = 40% 25 cases with 5 < FAI ≤ 9 Miscarriage Rate = 64% P=0.007 9 cases with FAI > 9 Miscarriage Rate = 78% Cocksedge et al. (2008) Human Reproduction 23, 797-802

  22. Causes of Endometrial Abnormality • uterine cavity pathology • Structural uterine anomalies • Endocrine aberrations • Excess of inhibitors of implantation

  23. Why does the presence of hydrosalpinges adversely affect IVF pregnancy rate ? Hydrosalpingeal fluid impairs endometrial function

  24. Hydrosalpinges and Leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) expression in the endometrium • LIF expression in the mid-luteal phase endometrium of infertile women (n=10) with hydrosalpinges was significantly lower than control fertile subjects • Salpingectomy resulted in increase of LIF expression in 8/10 subjects with hydrosalpinges Seli et al 2005 Human Reprod 20:3012

  25. Hydrosalpinges and integrin expression (αvβ3) in the endometrium • Integrin (αvβ3)expression in the mid-luteal phase endometrium of women with hydrosalpinges was significantly lower than control subjects • Salpingectomy resulted in increase of integrin (αvβ3)expression Meyer et al 1997 Human Reprod 12:1393 Bildirici et al 2001 Human Reprod 16:2422

  26. INVESTIGATIONPROTOCOL ENDOMETRIAL FACTORS CAUSING RIF

  27. Endometrial factors • Hysteroscopy - intra-uterine pathology • TVS/ MRI - Structural uterine anomalies • Hormone profile - Endometrial defects secondary to endocrine aberrations • HSG - hydrosalpinges • Endometrial Biopsy – uNK cells

  28. HYSTEROSCOPY • RCT by Demirol & Gurgan (2004) • 421 women with 2 or more IVF failures • 56 out of 210 (26%) women with normal HSG had intrauterine leisons detected by office hysteroscopy, and treated • The subsequent pregnancy rate in the treated group (30.4%) and the group with normal hysteroscopy (32.5%) was significantly higher than the group who did not undergo hysteroscopy (21.6%) A

  29. TREATMENT STRATEGIES

  30. RECOMMENDED MANAGEMENT OF RIF • Designated clinic and personnel • Detailed reproductive history and treatment outcome, structured sheet • Review Life style factors • Investigations according to an agreed clinic protocol • Multi-disciplinary approach

  31. Salpingectomy A

  32. SUBMUCOUS FIBROID B

  33. C

  34. The outcome of singleton pregnancies after IVF/ICSI in women before and after hysteroscopic resection of a uterine septum compared to normal controlsBan-Frangez et al, European J Obstet Gynae & Reprod Biol 2009 Retrospective Control Study

  35. SEPTUM TRANSECTION C

  36. Intrauterine adhesiolysis (scissors) C

  37. Life style modification – high BMI • Diet • Exercise • Pharmacological agents • Bariatric surgery C

  38. Novel Treatment

  39. ENDOMETRIAL SCRATCH -1 • RCT of repeated endometrial biopsies in the cycle immediately preceding IVF treatment significantly increased (~doubled) the implantation, pregnancy and live birth (28%, 67% & 49%) rates in women who had one or more IVF failure compared with control subjects (14%, 30% and 23%) (Barash et al 2003)

  40. ENDOMETRIAL SCRATCH - 2 • Cohort study of repeated endometrial biopsies in the cycle immediately preceding IVF treatment significantly increased the implantation & pregnancy (11% & 30%) rates in 60 women who had more than 4 fresh embro transfer compared with 57 control subjects (4% & 12%) (Raziel et al 2007)

  41. Endometrial Scratch -3 • RCT • 115 women with at least two implantation failures • Endometrial biopsy in the luteal phase of cycle preceding IVF/ICSI Karimzadeh et al, 2009 Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol 49: 677-80

  42. Endometrial scratch

  43. Summary • Definition • Endometrial / uterine factors • How to investigate • How to manage • Endometrial Scratch • Need for consensus • Need for more evidence

  44. THANKYOU

More Related