270 likes | 473 Views
Super star clusters and star-formation in interacting galaxies. Zara RANDRIAMANAKOTO. Supervisors : Petri Vaisanen (SAAO) Sarah Blyth (UCT) . SA SKA Annual Bursary Conference December, 2009. Objectives.
E N D
Super star clusters and star-formation in interacting galaxies Zara RANDRIAMANAKOTO Supervisors: Petri Vaisanen (SAAO) Sarah Blyth (UCT) SA SKA Annual Bursary Conference December, 2009
Objectives • Derive the first ever significant sample of K-band luminosity • functions (LFs) of extragalactic super star clusters (SSCs) • Estimate star formation rate (SFR) in interacting luminous infrared galaxies (LIRGs) from a study of SSCs LFs • Establish a spatial distribution of star formation (SF) • over the whole galaxy 2
Relevances of the project Key science in Astronomy: Understand the Universe 3
Relevances of the project Galaxy evolution (LIRGs) 4
Relevances of the project SF via SSCs 5
Why LIRGs ? LIRGs • Generally, an interacting system • High SFR • Large number of SSCs • Good laboratory for probing galaxy evolution and SF Elmegreen et al., 2006, ApJ 642, 158 6
Why SSCs ? • Characteristics: SSCs • Massive • Young • Luminous Whitmore et al., 2000; Elmegreen, 2002 • Location: Found whenever there is vigorous SF such as interacting LIRGs (Whitmore et al., 2000) 7
Why SSCs ? • Characteristics: SSCs • Massive • Young • Luminous Whitmore et al., 2000; Elmegreen, 2002 • Location: Found whenever there is vigorous SF such as interacting LIRGs (Whitmore et al., 2000) SSCs provide insight to the mechanisms of SF 8
Challenges: • SSCs are located in the obscured optical region of the galaxies • It is difficult to differentiate individual SSCs to its surrounding dusty regions 9
Challenges: • SSCs are located in the obscured optical region of the galaxies • It is difficult to differentiate individual SSCs to its surrounding dusty regions Solution: Observe in K-band using near infrared adaptive optics imaging K-band : observation suffers less of the dust effect AO : will resolve individual SSCs to large distances than before (a small field with high resolution) 10
Solution: Observe in K-band using NIR adaptive optics imaging HST/ACS VLT/NACO 2” 4.5” A region of IRAS 18293-3413, close to the nucleus ( Vaisanen et al., 2009). 11
Solution: Observe in K-band using NIR adaptive optics imaging HST/ACS VLT/NACO 2” 4.5” A region of IRAS 18293-3413, close to the nucleus ( Vaisanen et al., 2009). 12
Methodology Data reduction of a ten local LIRGs from VLT/NACO and GEMINI/ALTAIR (using K-band NIR AO, survey in progress) Imaging archival data for optical (HST/ACS) mid- and far-infrared(MIPS and IRAC) radio (VLA) wavelengths SSCs LFs Multi-wavelength observations SFR Spatial distribution of SF 13
Achievements GEMINI/ALTAIR Individual frames Data reduction (IRAF) Final combined image 14
MCG +08-11-002 IRAS F16516-0948 IC 694 Gemini co-added images NGC 3690 IRAS F17578-0400 15 CGCG 049-057 IRAS F17138-1017 UGC 8387
Achievements GEMINI/ALTAIR Individual frames Data reduction (IRAF) • Photometry calibration • Mag_zeropoint • Aperture correction Astrometry calibration (IRAF) Final combined image Objects detection (Sextractor) Aperture photometry (IRAF) SSCs LFs 16 Selection criteria
Preliminary results K-band SSCs LFs 17
Preliminary results K-band SSCs LFs • LFs exhibit a turnover at the faint end: • Observational incompleteness (Anders et al., 2007) • Small number of SSCs with lower luminosity 18
Preliminary results K-band SSCs LFs • LFs exhibit a turnover at the faint end: • Observational incompleteness (Anders et al., 2007) • Small number of SSCs with lower luminosity Solution: Use Monte-Carlo simulation to determine the completeness fraction 19
Preliminary results K-band SSCs LFs Theoretical observations: LFs shape follow a power-law distribution (de Grijs et al., 2003) 20
Preliminary results K-band SSCs LFs • Slope slightly deviates from 2 • Effect from photometric uncertainties or some statistical fluctuations • It can be real (the goal of the project) 21
Preliminary results K-band SSCs LFs • Slope slightly deviates from 2 • Effect from photometric uncertainties or some statistical fluctuations • It can be real (the goal of the project) • SSCs LFs systematic variations: • Steeper at higher luminosities (Whitmore et al., 1999; Larsen, 2002) • Steeper in redder filters (Elmegreen et al., 2002; Haas et al., 2008) 22
Preliminary results K-band SSCs LFs: shift of the peak Larsen, 2002; Bastian, 2008 The fainter the brightest star cluster, the lower its SFR 23
Preliminary results K-band SSCs LFs: shift of the peak Larsen, 2002; Bastian, 2008 The fainter the brightest star cluster, the lower its SFR 24 Expect that
Future outlook Data reduction of a ten local LIRGs from VLT/NACO and GEMINI/ALTAIR (using K-band NIR AO, survey in progress) Imaging archival data for optical (HST/ACS) mid- and far-infrared(MIPS and IRAC) radio (VLA) wavelengths SSCs LFs Multi-wavelength observations SFR Spatial distribution of SF 25
Future outlook Data reduction of a ten local LIRGs from VLT/NACO and GEMINI/ALTAIR (using K-band NIR AO, survey in progress) Imaging archival data for optical (HST/ACS) mid- and far-infrared(MIPS and IRAC) radio (VLA) wavelengths SSCs LFs GMRT/ATCA observations Multi-wavelength observations SFR Spatial distribution of SF 26
Expectations • Reason of the turnover in LF at the faint end • In the local Universe, only a small fraction of the global SF • density is contributed by LIRGs. However, at higher redshift, • the fraction becomes dominant (Iono et al., 2009). 27