380 likes | 515 Views
Learn about Present Worth Analysis and its application in Engineering Economics. Understand NPW formula, mutually exclusive alternatives, and decision-making based on costs, benefits, and interest rates.
E N D
Chapter 5Present Worth Analysis EGN 3615 ENGINEERING ECONOMICS WITH SOCIAL AND GLOBAL IMPLICATIONS
Three Economic Analysis Methods There are three major economic analysis techniques: • Present Worth Analysis • Annual Cash Flow Analysis • Rate of Return Analysis This chapter discusses the first techniques
Chapter Contents • Economic Criteria • Considering Project Life • Net Present Worth • Applying Present Worth Techniques • Useful Lives Equal the Analysis Period • Useful Lives Different from the Analysis Period • Infinite Analysis Period: Capitalized Cost • Multiple Alternatives • Spreadsheet Solution
Economic Criteria • Depending on situation, the economic criterion should be chosen from one of the following 3: Engineering Economics
Analysis Period • Specific time period, same for each alternative, called the analysis period, planning horizon, or project life • Three different analysis-period situations may be considered: • All alternatives have the same useful life: Set it as the analysis period. • Alternatives have different useful lives: Let the analysis period equal the least common multiple, or some realistic time (based on needs). • Infinite analysis period, n=∞ Engineering Economics
Net Present Worth (NPW or PW) • Here is the basic NPW formula: PW = PW of benefits – PW of cost Engineering Economics
Present Worth Techniques • Mutually exclusive alternatives: • Resolve their consequences to the present time. Engineering Economics
Present Worth—Equal Useful Lives • Example:Consider two mechanical devices to install to reduce cost. Expected costs and benefits of machines are shown in the following table for each device. If interest rate is 6%, which device should be purchased? Engineering Economics
A=$300 0 1 2 3 4 5 i=6% P= $1000 Example Continues Engineering Economics
$500 $450 $400 $350 $300 0 1 2 3 4 5 i=6% P= $1350 Example Continues Engineering Economics
A=$300 0 1 2 3 4 5 i=6% P= $1000 $500 $450 $400 $350 $300 0 1 2 3 4 5 i=6% P= $1350 Example Continues Work 5-4 DEVICE Bhas the larger present worth & is the preferred alternative Engineering Economics
Present Worth—Equal Useful Lives • Example: Consider two investments with expected costs and benefits shown below for each investment. If investments have lives equal to the 5-year analysis period, which one should be selected at 10% interest rate? Engineering Economics
Example Continues Engineering Economics
Example Continues Engineering Economics
Example Continues Salvage value is considered as another positive cash flow. Since criterion is to maximize PW (= present worth of benefits – present worth of costs), the preferred alterative is INVESTMENT1 Engineering Economics
Alternatives with different Useful Lives • Example: Consider two new equipments to perform desired level of (fixed) output. expected costs and benefits of machines are shown in the below table for each equipment. If interest rate is 6%, which equipment should be purchased? Engineering Economics
Example Continues • One method to select an analysis period is the least common multiple of useful lives. EQUIPMENT A $200 $200 Original Equipment A Investment Replacement Equipment A Investment 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 $1500 $1500 Engineering Economics
Question Continues EQUIPMENT B $350 Original Equipment B Investment 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 $1600 Engineering Economics
Question Continues EQUIPMENT A EQUIPMENT B For fixed output of 10 years of service of equipments, Equipment B is preferred because it has a smaller cost. Engineering Economics
Present Worth-Useful Lives are Different from the Analysis Period • Example: Consider two alternative production machines with expected initial costs & salvage values shown below. If interest rate is 10%, compare these alternatives over a (suitable) 10-year analysis period (by using the present worth method)? Engineering Economics
Example Continues $8,000 $15,000 $40,000 MACHINE A 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 7-year life 7-year life $40,000 Engineering Economics
Example Continues $10,000 MACHINE B 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 13-year life $65,000 Engineering Economics
Example Continues MACHINE A MACHINE B For fixed output of 10 years of service of equipments, Machine A is preferred because it has a smaller cost. Engineering Economics
Infinite Analysis Period (Capitalized Cost) • Capitalized cost is the present sum of money that is set aside now at a given interest rate to yield the funds (future interest earned) required to provide the service indefinitely. (5-2) Engineering Economics
Infinite Analysis Period (Capitalized Cost) • Example: How much should one set aside to pay $1000 per year for maintenance on an equipment if interest rate is 2.5% per year and the equipment is kept in service indefinitely (perpetual maintenance)? Engineering Economics
Multiple (3+) Alternatives • Question: Cash flows (costs and incomes) for three pieces of construction equipments are shown below. For 10% interest rate, which alternative should be selected? Engineering Economics
Question Continues $1000 $850 $700 $550 $400 $400 $400 $400 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EQUIPMENT 1 $2000 Engineering Economics
Question Continues $700 $300 $300 $300 $300 $400 $500 $600 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EQUIPMENT 2 $1500 Engineering Economics
Question Continues $650 $500 $500 $550 $600 $700 $500 $500 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 To maximize NPW, choose EQUIPMENT 1 EQUIPMENT 3 $3000 Engineering Economics
Question Continues (MS EXCEL) Use function: npv(rate, value range) - Return the net present value of a series of future cash flows “value range” at interest “rate”/period. rate = interest rate per period value range = the cash flow values Engineering Economics
Question Continues (MS EXCEL) Engineering Economics
Problem 5-15 Solutioni = 12% P = $980,000 purchase cost F = $20,000 salvage value after 13 years A = $200,000 annual benefit for 13 years PW = –P + A(P/A, 0.12, 13) + F(P/F, 0.12, 13) = –980000 + 200000(6.424) + 20000(0.2292) = $309,384 As PW > 0, purchase the machine. Or using MS EXCEL PW = -P + pv(0.12, 13, -200000, -20000) = $309,293.17 Terms A(P/A, 0.12, 13) and F(P/F, 0.12, 13) are combined! Engineering Economics
Problem 5-23 Solutioni = 18%/12 = 1.5% per month A = $500 payment/month n = 36 payments P = ? price of a car she can afford P = A(P/A, 0.015, 36) = 500(27.661) = $13,831 What is P, if r = 6%? i = 6%/12 = 0.5% P = pv(0.005, 36, -500) = $16,435.51 Do Problems 5-24, 5-25, 5-26! Engineering Economics
Problem 5-41 Outputs: 2000 lines for years 1~10 4000 lines for years 21~30 i = 10% per year, cables last for at least 30 yrs Option 1: 1 cable with capacity of 4000 lines Cost: $200k with $15k annual maintenance cost Option 2: 1 cable with capacity of 2000 lines now 1 cable with capacity of 2000 lines in 10 years Cost: $150k with $10k maintenance cost/year/cable (a) Which option to choose? (b) Will answer to (a) change if 2000 additional lines are needed in 5 years, instead of 10 years? Engineering Economics
Problem 5-41 Solution (a) Present worth of cost for option 1 PW 0f cost = $200k + $15k(P/A, 10%, 30) = $341,400 Present worth of cost for option 2: PW of cost = $150k + $10k(P/A, 10%, 30) + $150k(P/F, 0.1, 10) + $10k(P/A, 0.1, 20)(P/F, 0.1, 10) = $334,900 Select option 2, as it has a smaller PW of cost. Engineering Economics
Problem 5-41 Solution (b) Cost for option 1 will not change. PW 0f cost = $341,400 Present worth of cost for option 2: PW of cost = $150k + $10k(P/A, 10%, 30) + $150k(P/F, 0.1, 5) + $10k(P/A, 0.1, 25)(P/F, 0.1, 5) = $394,300 Therefore, the answer will change to option 1. Engineering Economics
End of Chapter 5 Engineering Economics