1.01k likes | 1.24k Views
Evolutionary physiology topics. 1. Patterns. 2. Processes. Evolutionary physiology topics. 1. Patterns. How and why of particular transitions. How and why did endothermic vertebrates evolve from ectothermic ancestors?. Endothermy versus ectothermy. scala naturae.
E N D
Evolutionary physiology topics 1. Patterns 2. Processes
Evolutionary physiology topics 1. Patterns • How and why of particular transitions How and why did endothermic vertebrates evolve from ectothermic ancestors?
Endothermy versus ectothermy scala naturae
Endothermy versus ectothermy Advantages of endothermy: • Independent of environment • Stenothermy • Aerobic metabolism
Endothermy versus ectothermy Advantages of ectothermy: • Low energetic requirements
mammals Passerine birds reptiles metabolism (Wg-1day-1) 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0.1g 10g 1kg 100kg 1000kg
Endothermy versus ectothermy Advantages of ectothermy: • Low energy requirements • Low food habitats
Endothermy versus ectothermy Advantages of ectothermy: • Low energy requirements • Low food habitats • Fluctuating food habitats
Flinders Island Mt Chappell Island Cape Barren Island
Chappell Island tiger snake (Notechis ater serventyi) Short-tailed shearwater (Puffinus tenuirostris)
Endothermy versus ectothermy Advantages of ectothermy: • Low energy requirements • Low food habitats • Fluctuating food habitats • Small body dimensions
body length surface/volume
mammals: >20 g lizards: 8% spp. < 1 g 80% spp. < 20 g salamanders: 20% spp. < 1 g 90% spp. < 20 g
Dwarf chameleon Monte Iberia Eleuth Dwarf gecko
Kitti’s hog-nosed bat L: 29-33 mm Etruscan shrew W: 1.5-2.5 g FR: 4xW/day HR: 835 b/min RR: 661 p/min
Endothermy versus ectothermy Advantages of ectothermy: • Low energy requirements • Low food habitats • Fluctuating food habitats • Small body dimensions • Elongate body forms
surface/volume diameter height height/diameter
wood rat (Neotoma sp.) weasel (Mustela nivalis) energy loss: x2
Afrocaecilia taitana Desmognathus ochrophaeus Bipes bipes Anguis fragilis
Endothermy versus ectothermy Advantages of ectothermy: • Low energy requirements • Low food habitats • Fluctuating food habitats • Small body dimensions • Elongate body forms • Low water habitats
Sauromalus obesus Scaphiopus couchii
Endothermy versus ectothermy Advantages of ectothermy: • Low energy requirements • Low food habitats • Fluctuating food habitats • Small body dimensions • Elongate body forms • Low water habitats • Low oxygen habitats
Iguana iguana Amblyrhynchus cristatus
Dilong paradoxus Xu et al. 2004. Nature 431: 680-684.
Synapsida (mammal-like reptiles) Dimetrodon (Pelycosauria) Moschops (Therapsida)
Endothermy in Mammalia: RM x5 Tb > Ta, 28°C < Tb < 40°C DTcore < 1-2°C Maerox5
increase in size (30-100 kg) become inertial homeotherms Tb constant, physiological benefits evolve insulation decrease in size increased metabolism improved insulation • Thermoregulation first • physiological version Synapsida evolve from small ectotherms McNab 1978. Am. Nat. 112: 1-21.
increase in size (30-100 kg) becomeinertial homeotherms evolve larger, more complex brains Tb constant, physiological benefits evolve insulation • Thermoregulation first • brain version Synapsida evolve from small ectotherms Hulbert 1980.
increase in size (30-100 kg) becomeinertial homeotherms evolve nocturnal habits Tb constant, physiological advantages evolve insulation • Thermoregulation first • ecological version Synapsida evolve from small ectotherms Crompton et al. 1978. Nature 272: 333-336.
Aerobic capacity first • sustained ativity version small change in basal metabolic rate minimal effect on thermoregulatory capacity large effect on maximal aerobic metabolic rate Ruben 1995 Ann. Rev. Physiol. 57: 69-95.
Aerobic capacity first • parental care version small change in basal metabolic rate minieme verandering in thermoregulatie-capaciteit large effect on maximal aerobic metabolic rate necessary for locomotor costs related to parental care Koteja 2000 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 267: 479-484
Evolutionary physiology topics 1. Patterns • How and why of particular transitions • Testing a-priori-hypotheses • plastic responses are adaptive
Dicerandra linearifolia • leaf length • leaf thickness • density of stomata Winn A.A. 1999. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 306-313.
Beneficial acclimation hypothesis Colder is better Hotter is better
Beneficial acclimation hypothesis Deleterious acclimation hypothesis
Beneficial acclimation hypothesis Escherichia coli Leroi et al. 1994.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 1917-1921.
32° 32° 32° 37° 41.5° 41.5° 41.5° competition acclimation Beneficial acclimation hypothesis > Escherichia coli > Leroi et al. 1994.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 1917-1921.
Beneficial acclimation hypothesis Bicyclus anynana Geister T.L. & Fischer 2007. Behav. Ecol. 18: 658-664.