1 / 16

Consumer-Oriented Evaluation Approaches

Consumer-Oriented Evaluation Approaches. Evaluating technologies in reproductive health: case studies of a consumer protection approach Jennifer Hass. What is a consumer-oriented evaluation approach?.

terrel
Download Presentation

Consumer-Oriented Evaluation Approaches

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Consumer-Oriented Evaluation Approaches Evaluating technologies in reproductive health: case studies of a consumer protection approach Jennifer Hass

  2. What is a consumer-oriented evaluation approach? • When independent agencies, governmental agencies, and individuals compile information on education or other human services products for the consumer. • Goal: To help consumers become more knowledgeable about products

  3. For what purposes is it applied • Typically applied to educational products and programs • Governmental agencies • Independent consumer groups • Educational Products Information Exchange • To represent the voice and concerns of the consumers

  4. How is it generally applied • Creating and using stringent checklists and criteria • Michael Scriven • Educational Products Information Exchange • U.S. Dept of Education • Program Effectiveness Panel • Processes • Content • Transportability • Effectiveness

  5. Advantages • Has made evaluations available on products and programs to consumers who may have not had the time or resources to do the evaluation process themselves • Increases the consumers’ knowledge about using criteria and standards to objectively and effectively evaluate educational and human services products • Consumers have become more aware of market strategies

  6. Disadvantages • Increases product costs onto the consumer • Product tests involves time and money, typically passed onto the consumer • Stringent criteria and standards may curb creativity in product creation • Concern for rise of dependency of outside products and consumer services rather than local initiative development

  7. Case Study Evaluating technologies in reproductive health: case studies of a consumer protection approach

  8. Why evaluate health care technologies in Brazil? • Less emphasis has been placed on health care technologies for the consumer • Typically for health professionals • Governments like Brazil are weak and incapable of being responsible for the regulation and quality control of health care products • Supply of reproductive technologies dominated by market, not consumer, interests

  9. Women’s Health, Reproductive Rights and Consumer Protection • Brazilian Institute for Consumer Protection (IDEC) • Oswaldo Cruz Foundation • Other academic and research centers (later on) • Objective: • To evaluate and improve the safety and efficacy of health care products on the Brazilian market that affect women’s reproductive health • To represent consumer interests and concerns

  10. Method of evaluation • Evaluation led by non-governmental organizations and consumer activists groups • Tested a wide range of products • Using evaluations of international scientific literature to assess the safety and efficacy of products • Using laboratory quality control studies

  11. What was tested? • Products for treating STDs and vaginal infections • Condoms • Pregnancy Tests • Hormonal Contraceptives • Infant Formulas • Teratogenic Drugs

  12. Methods to make the evaluation effective • Disseminate information to: • Consumers via mass media • Health care professionals • Formal scientific papers and requests for action given to regulatory authorities and manufacturers • Participation of consumer activist groups in advisory boards to the government • If all else fails: legal action

  13. Results/Findings • Significant proportion of reproductive products on the marketplace in Brazil were considered unsafe or ineffective • Many manufacturers removed or improved product • Government took no action • Exception: drug regulation in using combination drugs for STDs

  14. How useful/important is this study? • Scientific evaluation in combination with effective dissemination of information can improve the quality of products • Seen through influencing public regulatory decisions, educating consumers, or putting pressure on the manufacturers • Didn’t mention what standards or criteria used to judge safety and effectiveness

  15. My thoughts.. • Good example of a consumer-oriented evaluation approach • Displays that the approach can be effective even without government involvement • Must be led by consumer interest

  16. Questions?

More Related