360 likes | 495 Views
Pitfalls of Migrating to SharePoint 2010. Scott Hoag & Dan Usher. Who are we?. Scott Hoag Recently picked up off waivers Jack of All Trades, Master of Some
E N D
Pitfalls of Migrating to SharePoint 2010 Scott Hoag & Dan Usher
Who are we? • Scott Hoag • Recently picked up off waivers • Jack of All Trades, Master of Some • With over 8 years of experience, Scott has been utilizing Microsoft based content management solutions from MCMS 2002 to SharePoint 2010 today • Enjoys discussions about user adoption, search, and world peace • Recently began consuming (green) vegetables • Twitter: @ciphertxt
Who are we? • Dan Usher • SharePoint Architect and Implementation Engineer, Principal Button Clicker, and Service Monkey • 7 years of experience with SharePoint going back to adventures with STS 2001 and SPS 2003 to the present… • Enjoys discussions about Claims AuthZ, SmartCardAuthN, Atomic Molecular Optics & the Walking Dead • Follows the SharePoint Credo -ADIDASAll Day IDream About SharePoint • Twitter: @usher
What about you all? How much does your service monkey know about SharePoint migrations? Right now, not much… Ask me again in an hour…
Smithers, fetch my agenda. • Migration vs. Upgrade • 3rd Party Tools vs. OOTB Methods • Consolidation Considerations • Content Assessments • User Adoption • User Experience and Training • AuthN Changes • Entropy vs. Order
Migration vs. Upgrade • Data migration is the process of transferring data between storage types, formats, or computer systems. 1 • System migration involves moving a set of instructions or programsfrom one platform to another, minimizing re-engineering. 2 • Migration of systems can also involve downtime, while the old system is replaced with a new one. • The term upgrade refers to the replacement of a product with a newer version of the same product. 3 1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_migration 2 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_migration 3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upgrade
It’s all technical… right? • Make sure that you’ve successfully incorporated the technology components that help drive adoption • Implement a Training Plan • Implement a Communications Plan • Decide on a Content Migration Strategy • Have a User Support Plan • Provide Incentives and Rewards • Enable End-user Feedback • Align Business Objectives
Lets get technical… • Hardware and Software Requirements • 64-bit hardware • Windows Server 2008 or Windows Server 2008 R2 • Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 / SQL Server 2008 with Service Pack 1 (SP1) and Cumulative Update 2 / SQL Server 2005 with SP3 and Cumulative Update 3 • SharePoint 2007? Service Pack 2 • Other preparation • SharePoint 2001 - Consider a Third Party Tool • SharePoint 2003 - Hire a Consultant, PreScan.exe, ReGhost.net, GhostHunterWebParts • SharePoint 2007 - Service Pack 2: STSADM.exe -o preupgradecheck • SharePoint 2010 - test-spcontentdatabasecmdlet Other Resources
3rd Party Tools vs. OOTB • Out of the Box • In-place • Database Attach • 3rd Party • AxcelerDavinci Migrator • AvePointDocAve • Metalogix Migration Manager • Idera SharePoint Migration Suite (OEM’d by Quest) • Tzunami Migration • Kapow Solutions • XavorSolutions
In-Place or Database Attach • In-place • Same operating system (x64 required) • Same hardware (x64 required) • Content andsettings come along • Farm is offline while upgrading • Database Attach • New hardware • Onlycontent comes along • Content is not available while upgrading, but you get to pick the order! • Parallel upgrades of content • Combine multiple farms • Hybrid • Database attach read-only databases • In-place upgrade with detached databases
What about upgrading 2010 to Service Pack 1? Consolidating content from one 2010 farm to another? • Upgrade from Pre-SP1 to SP1 Required • Farm, Web Application or Content Database PSConfig-cmd upgrade -inplace b2b -wait -force • Site Collection Backup and Restore Upgrade your farm to SP1
Authentication Changes • Classic AuthN • Integrated Windows AuthN with NTLM / Kerberos • Claims AuthN and AuthZ • Integrated Windows AuthN with NTLM / Kerberos • Forms Based Auth • Trusted Identity Provider (aka SAML & WS Fed)
Considerations when choosing… • Additional setup for IWA Claims – Claims to Token for Kerberos Delegation • PerformancePoint Services, InfoPath Forms Services, Excel Services, etc. • Search Alerts, Search Crawling • SharePoint Explorer View • Secure Store comes in handy… • Forms Based AuthN – Still have a Membership Provider and Role Manager to register within web.config • When setting up a Trusted Identity Provider there’s a bit of work that must be done…
More considerations… • Be prepared to figure out your AuthZ side of things • IWA leverages NT Security Token • Forms Role Manager information mapped • Group Claims information • Identities with one Claim Provider aren’t the same as with another… • c:0j.c|claimprovider|useraccount != c:0#.f|claimprovider|useraccount • Similar to Domain A and Domain B user objects in Classic • Multitenancy • Single zone… • Partitioned search… • Partitioned user profiles… • Partitioned Managed MetaData…
What’s that mean to me? • Classic to Classic • Mapping “should” stay intact • Classic to Claims • Mapping update required • Classic Provider Identity to Claim Provider Identity • Migrate a web application… • http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg251985.aspx
What about Search? • Have you updated your Information Architecture? • Should be able to find information in any of 3 scenarios: • I know it exists and I know where it is • I know it exists, but I don’t know where it is • I don’t know if it exists • Talk to your users! Relevancy optimization is an ongoing process.
What about Custom Solutions? • Web Templates and Site Definitions • BDC -> Application Registry Database • Custom Solutions • .Net version – recompile for appropriate framework • Farm Solutions to Sandboxed Solutions • Third Party Tools
What about Workflows? • Remember to breathe… • In-place upgrades are your best bet • Third Party Tools with Full Fidelity • Axceler • AvePoint • Metalogix • … and others? • Gotchas • Not using the latest and greatest… • Workflow History Cleanup
Content Assessment • How much data we have and where does it reside? • If we’re migrating, how will the transfer occur? • How long will it take? • Considerations for Search • Corpus size • Multilingual? • Does your content need to change in the new system? • Choice fields vs. Managed Metadata • Content Type authoring in a Content Hub?
Consolidation Considerations • Does your existing taxonomy fit in the new system? • Do you have existing systems / applications that will also be migrated into SharePoint? • Do we need to (un)consolidate? • Single site collections that need to be broken apart into multiple collections • Sites that need to be promoted into site collections? • Do we have too many site collections in our databases? • Customizations / Farm Solutions
Still more Content to assess… • Identify 3rd party tools/web parts/etc. that are installed in your current farm • Is there a 2010 version available? • Is the functionality now available OOTB in SharePoint (Ratings, Faceted Search, …) • Don’t forget your non-SharePoint data. Lotus? WebSphere? Drupal? DotNetNuke? Alfresco? Legacy HTML? Non-OCR’d Text Documents? Orchard?
Other Solution Sets • What about the Fab 40? • What about the Productivity Hub? • Where’d my Site Directory go? • Where’d my SharePoint Designer Site Export go?
Prepping for Migration…Disaster Recovery • Do you have plans? • Have you tested your plans? • Mirroring? Clustering? • Regression Plans
What about the Users? • User Experience • Visual Upgrade (aka v3) is familiar. The ribbon is not. • Are you deploying the Office Web Applications? (Co-authoring can be fun!) • Multiple item selections. Refinement panels. Metadata navigation. Oh my! • What about your licensing? Enterprise? Standard? • Office Workspace? Groove? • Mobile? • Oh, you are upgrading your Office Clients too right?
Training? Do we have to? • YES! • Training Tools • Videos • Computer based training • Formal classroom training • “Office hours” (on-going) • Productivity Hub from Microsoft • If you have have to provide extensive training to your typical user, you’ve most likely made some fundamental design mistakes!
Entropy vs. Order Entropy - /ˈentrəpē/ • A thermodynamic quantity representing the unavailability of a system's thermal energy for conversion into mechanical work, often... • Lack of order or predictability; gradual decline into disorder. Order - /ˈôrdər/ • The arrangement or disposition of people or things in relation to each other according to a particular sequence, pattern, or method.
Something to remember SharePoint Implementations today consist of a race between Architects, Developers and IT Pros striving to build well planned out, bigger and better idiot-proof solutions, and the Universe trying to produce requirements of entropy with bigger and better idiots. …so far, the Universe is winning.
Thank your Sponsors! The umlaut symbol ü The number e e the exponential function is the derivative of itself
Everyone is invited to #SharePintImmediately following SharePoint Saturday Boston Meet at Skellig @ 240 Moody Street 2.2 miles ~ 42 minutes walking, 9 minutes driving SharePint: a gathering of SharePoint enthusiasts for fun, food, and drink.
Evaluations & Questions? • Please fill out your evaluations before you leave…
Reference • What's new in upgrade • Determine upgrade approach • SharePoint Server 2010 capacity management: Software boundaries and limits • Video demos and training for SharePoint Server 2010 • SharePoint 2010 Adoption Best Practices