1 / 26

New b s measurement at CDF

New b s measurement at CDF. F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa BEACH 2010 Perugia, 22 June 2010. Introduction Context SM description The measurement Fit strategy Signals Flavor tagging Results. The Context. Great SM success in B d /B u sector Thanks B-factories!

terryfernandez
Download Presentation

New b s measurement at CDF

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. New bs measurement at CDF F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa BEACH 2010 Perugia, 22 June 2010 • Introduction • Context • SM description • The measurement • Fit strategy • Signals • Flavor tagging • Results F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  2. The Context • Great SM success in Bd/Bu sector • Thanks B-factories! • ...but no evidence for new physics there • Bs sector can still provide surprises • Natural physics for Tevatron experiments • In 2006 Dms measurement from Bs mixing • Right on the SM expectations! • Next step is measurement of CP violating phases eg. bs • …some excitement there so far A/A = 6.05 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  3. d f S M i i i 2 1 t t t ¾ e v a o n r o m e x p e c a o n s . Status July 2009 • Previous CDF+D0 combined results intriguing F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  4. N N ¡ ¹ ¹ B B B B a = l s N N + ¹ ¹ B B B B Related measurements • Semileptonic asymmetry • Related to DG, Dm and bs • SM expectation ~ 10-5 • Old results from CDF and D0: • Intriguing new D0 result F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  5. bs in SM • bs is the phase of –Vts • ≠ 0 in O(l4) CKM expansion • VCKM = • Quite well constrained assuming SM and very small CKM fitter. Sept. 2009 0.01812±0.0008 All real F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  6. p m 1 2 ¼ j j q m 1 2 Basic Theory • 2 state effective theory: • Describes mixing and CP violation • M,  hermitian • CPT invariance: M11 =M22 ,11 =22 • After diagonalization: • Eigenvalues: • Eigenstates: F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  7. Á S M i M M ¢ N P e = 1 2 1 2 s Ds- W- b c c B Ds+ s s Origin of off-diagonal terms • m12 from box diagram • Top quark dominant • M12  V2ts  e-2is • New physics possible in loops! • 12 from common final states • For Bs dominated by Ds+Ds- • / ~ 0.10 • G12 mostly real: s ~ -2s • Tree level dominated • Hard to see new physics here •  = 2Re{12/ m12}| m12 | = 2 |12| cos  F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  8. ¯ ¯ ¡ ¢ ¡ 1 2 ¯ ¯ Á Á A i t s n a n = = S L ¯ ¯ M ¢ M ¯ ¯ 1 2 Measured quantities • Mixing frequency (theory limited): • DM = 2 |M12| • Width difference (statistics limited): • DG = 2|G12| cos f • Semileptonic asymmetry (stat.+syst. limited) • Bs – Bs bar interference in decay to common final state such as J/yf (statistics limited) • -Im(p/q) ~ sin(2bs) ~ -sin f This measurement F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  9. 2 2 2 j j j j j j A A A 1 + + = = = ? 0 ¹ A f A · ¹ ¸ · ¸ A ! A f p q f f A = ¡ = i 2 ¡ ¡ ¡ t t i ¹ ¹ 2 ¡ ¡ t t j ( ) ( = ) ( = ) m j ( ) ( = ) ( = ) f B A ¢ ¢ m i i f 2 2 B A ¢ ¢ t t i i t f 2 2 ¡ t t t < > ¡ < > e e c o s m s n m e e c o s m s n m = f = f ¹ A A q p f f Analysis strategy Simplified time evolution (DG=0) and f = CP-eigenstate • Study time evolution of BsJ/yf decay • No SM weak phases in = ±1 • Sign depends on CP of final state • ... but J/yf is vector-vector  mixture of CP-even and CP-odd • Need to perform full angular analysis to separate the components • L=0 and L=2 are CP-even, L=1 is CP-odd • prefer to use “transversity basis”: A0, A//: CP-even, A┴ : CP-odd • Phys. Lett. B 369, 144 (1996), 184 - hep-ph/9511363 • Need to introduce more hadronic decay amplitudes and their phases: • A0, A//, A┴ ( ), d//, d┴ (phases relative to A0) F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  10. Full Bs decay rate formula time dependence terms angular dependence terms terms with bsdependence terms with Dms dependence present if initial state of B meson (B vs anti-B) is determined (flavor tagged) ‘strong’ phases: - Identification of B flavor at production (flavor tagging) → better sensitivity to bs F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  11. Improvements over past • Luminosity: 2.9  5.2 fb-1 • Signal optimization with NN • ~ 6500 BsJ/yf, S/N ~ 1 • Improved flavor tagging completely recalibrated (see later) • Inclusion of f0 scalar component (BsJ/yf0) (see later) Optimized for best bs resolution F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  12. Flavor tagging • Opposite side (OST) • Jet / lepton charge • Combined with NN • Calibrate with 52,000 J/yK+ • e = 94.2±0.4%, D = 11.5±0.2% • eD2 = 1.2% • Same side Kaon (SSKT) • Sign of soft kaon near Bs • Dilution from simulation • Calibrate with ~ 13,000 BsDs(3)pi • From mixing amplitude scan • eD2 = 3.2±1.4% Dms= 17.79 Old CDF result F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  13. CDF Run II Preliminary 5.2 fb-1 Results: Bs lifetime & DG • Point measurement assuming SM • Set bs = 0 • Most precise measurement of Bs lifetime and DG PDG 2009 averages: ts= 1.472+0.024-0.026 ps DGs = 0.062+0.034-0.037 ps-1 ct (cm) CP-even (Bslight) and CP-odd (Bsheavy) components have different lifetimes → DG ≠ 0 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  14. Results: polarization amplitudes • bs = 0 fit • Most precise measurement Signal fit projection CDF preliminary Background fit projection F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  15. CP Violation Phase bs with 5.2 fb-1 at CDF • Final confidence regions in bs-DGs space: • Full fit results • Low statistics & dilutions • Some parameters very non-Gaussian, including bs • Contours corrected for • Non-gaussian effects • Systematics • Note fit symmetry • bs projection • [0.02, 0.52] U [1.08, 1.55] at 68% C.L. Agreement with SM expectation is at ~0.8s level Agreement with SM prediction at ~1 s level F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  16. Effect of s-wave resonance (Suggested in arXiv:0908.3627v1 [hep-ph] 25 Aug 2009) • Effect of BsJ/y f0 • Fit prefers ~ 2% • Consistent with m(KK) fit • < 6.7% @ 95% CL Not adjusted for non-Gaussian errors F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  17. Conclusions & prospects • Best measurement of Bs lifetime, DG and polarization amplitudes • Tighter constraints on bs • Improved agreement with SM (~1s) • Future improvements • Statistics doubled (10 fb-1) by end of 2011 Tevatron run • More data ~ 25-30% from track based triggers • Additional decay modes: • y(2S)f • J/y f0, f0pp (CP-eigenstate) F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  18. Getting hot LHCb CDF+DØ Probability of 5 observation s --- 10/fb (2011) --- 8/fb (2010) Tevatron 2011: discover or exclude NP in wide range of phases. LHCb competitive (if everything turns out as expected) F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  19. Backup slides Backup slides F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  20. Opposite Side Tagging Calibration and Performance • OST combines in a NN opposite side lepton and jet charge information • Initially calibrated using a sample of inclusive semileptonic B decays • predicts tagging probability on event-by-event basis • Re-calibrated using ≈ 52,000 B+/- → J/Ψ K+/-decays • OST efficiency = 94.2 +/- 0.4%, OST dilution = 11.5 +/- 0.2 % - Total tagging power = 1.2% F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  21. Same Side Tagging Calibration • Event-by-event predicted dilution based on simulation • Calibrated with 5.2 fb-1 of data • Simultaneously measuring the Bs mixing frequency Dms and the dilution scale factor A - D – event by event predicted dilution • ξ – tagging decision = +1, -1, 0 for Bs, Bs and un-tagged events • Fully reconstructed Bs decays selected by displaced track trigger F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  22. Detector Angular Efficiency • CP even and CP odd final states have different angular distributions → use angles r = (,,) to statistically separate CP even and CP odd components • Detector acceptance distorts the angular distributions → determine 3D angular efficiency function from simulation and account for this effect in the fit CDF Simulation of Detector Angular Sculpting cos(θ) cos(ψ) Φ(rad) F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  23. S-Wave • As noted in arxiv:0812.2832v3, the final state in Bs→ J/Ψ KK decays can be in an s-wave state with a ~6% contribution in a +/-10 MeV window around the Φpeak • Systematic effects from neglecting such contribution were first investigated by Clarke et al in arxiv:0908.3627v1 where it is shown that: - 10% un-accounted s-wave contamination in the Φ region leads to - 10% bias in the measured 2bs , towards the SM prediction - 15% increase in statistical errors • S-wave contribution can be either non-resonant or from the f0(980) resonance • To account for potential s-wave contribution, enhance the likelihood function to account for the s-wave amplitude AS and interference between s-wave and p-wave • Time dependence of the s-wave amplitude AS is CP-odd, same as A┴ • Mass and phase of s-wave component are assumed flat (good approximation in a narrow +/- 10 MeV around the Φ mass) F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  24. S-Wave Cross Check Using KK Mass Spectrum - Cross check the result from angular fit by fitting the KK invariant mass spectrum - From a fit to the Bs mass distribution with wide KK mass range selection (0.980,1.080 GeV), determine contributions of combinatorial background, mis-reconstructed B0, and Bs events - Good fit of the KK mass spectrum with 2% f0 contributions Barely visible S-wave component F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  25. Non-Gaussian Regime - Pseudo-experiments show that we are still not in perfect Gaussian regime → quote confidence regions instead of point estimates - In ideal case (high statistics, Gaussian likelihood), to get the 2D 68% (95%) C.L. regions, take a slice through profiled likelihood at 2.3 (6.0) units up from minimum • In this analysis integrated likelihood ratio distribution (black histogram) deviates from the ideal c2 distribution (green continuous curve) • Using pseudo-experiments establish a “map” between Confidence Level and 2Dlog(L) • All nuisance parameters are randomly varied within +/- 5s from their best fit values and maps of CL vs 2Dlog(L) re-derived • To establish final confidence regions use most conservative case non-Gaussian correction for wide variations of nuisance parameters F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

  26. Systematic Uncertainties F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa

More Related